The Graduate Student Learning Journey

On January 9th, 2014, Dr. Margaret Macintyre Latta hosted a Graduate Student Colloquium in EME 1123, the classroom / learning lab of the ILC. Graduate students, faculty and staff enjoyed ‘new year / new term’ conversations, connections and refreshments before and after a short agenda including:

Dr. Annette LaGrange, associate dean, welcoming the new graduate students and providing her “best advice — for today — for a learning journey”.

Dr. Leyton Schnellert, coordinator of Professional Development, reflecting on his PhD journey which was completed not that long ago.

Dr. Wendy Klassen, director of undergraduate programs, and Desiree Marshall-Peer discussed their learning journey together as Wendy supervises Desiree’s master’s program.

Rhonda Draper, a master’s student, explained the beginnings of her learning journey.

Lindsay Cox, assistant to Dr. Macintyre Latta, provided ‘pitfalls to avoid and practices to embrace‘ as graduate students journey through their programs.

Angela Finley, graduate student representative, welcomed new students and provided some information about the E-Grads network.

Five graduate students presented their learning and research journey in 3-MINUTE THESIS PRESENTATIONS:

Cindy Bourne: Toward Responsible Community-driven International Service-Learning Projects for Pre-service Teaching Candidates – A case study approach.

Vania Chan: An Assessment of Post-Secondary Technology Readiness

Mary Clark: The Use of Interactive Digital Media to Engage Youth with Science and Nature

Rhonda Draper: When we are One — The Individual/Collective Terrain of Creating A Large-Scale Arts Experience

Angela Finley: Fostering Success– The Question of Belongingness at the Graduate Level

Desiree Marshall-Peer: Challenging Teachers to Change the Norm

 

Sweden’s new lack of classrooms

Furniture designed to aid students in engaging while working.  Schools is based on grouping by learning at the students’ levels rather than age or grade.

Physical spaces are designed to:

  • foster curiosity and creativity
  • encourage independence and collaboration
  • support group projects and PBL

http://edudemic.com/2012/09/swedens-newest-school-system-has-no-classrooms/

PBL Instructional design

A seven phase model for PBL instructional design

Phase 1: Introducing the Driving Question

  • compelling
  • open-ended
  • meaningful
  • higher-level question requiring students to think deeply
  • has no right or wrong answer
  • provides instructor an opportunity to ascertain differing levels of prior knowledge and plan appropriately for instruction

Phase 2: Introducing the Culminating Challenge

  • needs to be some type of authentic assessment or performance in which students clearly demonstrate learning
  • examples might include a moot court, election simulation, authoring a children’s book, developing a web site, a town hall meeting, etc.
  • students are provided with guided choice concerning the options for authentic role(s).

Phase 3: Developing Subject Matter Expertise

  • creation of individual and team tasks to lead students to success on both the culminating challenge and summative assessment
  • students embody authentic roles and thus have a “need to know” more about the concepts and skills
  • utilizes inquiry methods to help students explore new concepts, but provide enough background information on the new vocabulary and concepts that students can figure out how to move forward.

Phase 4: Doing the Culminating Challenge

  • chance for students to demonstrate their learning in a performance assessment
  • if possible, bring in subject matter experts to help assess the quality of student work
  • an outside perspective will “up the stakes” for students who are used to presenting just to the teachers or classmates

Phase 5: Debriefing the Culminating Challenge (Ideally with Subject-Matter Experts)

  • debriefing is easy to overlook or breeze past due to never-ending time constraints
  • reflective practice of debriefing is extremely valuable for students and teachers alike.

Phase 6: Responding to the Driving Question

  • ask students to respond to the driving question once again
  • students should have new vocabulary and a deep, conceptual understanding of the material covered during the cycle.
  • as students complete this exercise, hand back their initial responses
  • allow time to examine the differences between the two writing samples and acknowledge the learning.

Phase 7: Summative Assessment

  • summative measure is an important way to assess student learning.
  • common summative assessment include district benchmark assessment, practice Advanced Placement exam or other unit test
  • should measure student proficiency on those concepts and skills deemed important.

http://www.edutopia.org/blog/practical-pbl-design-amber-graeber