Academic librarians who are watching the shifting landscape of journal impact factors have yet another one to track called the Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) by Henk Moed from Leiden University.
In Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals Moed says:
“This paper explores a new indicator of journal citation impact, denoted as source normalized impact per paper (SNIP). It measures a journal’s contextual citation impact, taking into account characteristics of its properly defined subject field, especially the frequency at which authors cite other papers in their reference lists, the rapidity of maturing of citation impact, and the extent to which a database used for the assessment covers the field’s literature. It further develops Eugene Garfield’s notions of a field’s ‘citation potential’ defined as the average length of references lists in a field and determining the probability of being cited, and the need in fair performance assessments to correct for differences between subject fields. A journal’s subject field is defined as the set of papers citing that journal. SNIP is defined as the ratio of the journal’s citation count per paper and the citation potential in its subject field. It aims to allow direct comparison of sources in different subject fields…”
Yvonne Chan
lse721
Pingback: ยป Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) The Search Principle blog Image