Week 02: The Edtech Marketplace Page 2RSS Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • teacherben 11:31 pm on September 11, 2012
    0 votes
    |

    Tags:   

    This is the second annual blog post from ‘The eLearning Coach’ where the author, Connie Malamed, gives her predictions of which educational technologies will really take off in the upcoming year.  The article is perhaps meant as casual reading and provides some ‘food for thought’ but her predictions are fairly conservative and there is nothing particularly surprising […]

    Continue reading Learning Technology Trends to Watch Posted in: General, Week 02: The Edtech Marketplace
     
    • tomwhyte1 12:39 pm on September 12, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      I find it interesting the delay this article has in presenting “trends” when compared to other similar articles. Might this be her attempt to allow the general educator time enough to become familiar with the technology to use, and not those on the cutting edge?

      Thoughts?

    • teacherben 7:21 pm on September 12, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      My guess is that she composed her list based on her reading of other people’s top ten lists. Her blog rarely has anything original. She is more of a content curator than anything else.

      • tomwhyte1 8:39 am on September 13, 2012 | Log in to Reply

        Interesting observation, which would force one to recommend this type of posting based upon the individual teacher. Those who need time, and more general information, experience should utilize this type of information. Where as our early adopters should steer clear?

        Thoughts?

    • Mike Rae 11:05 pm on September 12, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      I think that lists like these that are casual, light readings are more important than ones that are overly technical. The majority of educators and administrators do not subscribe to “Wired” or follow Ed Tech professional’s twitter feeds. Lists like this might be purposefully underwhelming as to not scare off an on-the-fence educator who might be looking to become more tech-savvy. If the overall goal is to encourage more teachers to use and become interested in the available technology to increase learning efficiency, it is important to give opportunity for some to start in the shallow end of the swimming pool, so to speak.

      • tomwhyte1 8:41 am on September 13, 2012 | Log in to Reply

        I agree with your statements, as to not scare them off.

        However, to help facilitate more general educators, would it not be beneficial to add ideas, suggestings, examples on how this technology might look like within a classroom. Allowing teachers to get their “feet wet” before jumping into the pool.

        Thoughts?

    • adi 2:18 pm on September 13, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      I agree she just mentions the tools, but not how they could be integrated into classroom practice. She says that the advantage of clouds is that you don’t have the content of your course in your desktop; i though this was the case with an LMS, too. And if you look up the sites she mentions, they are all private companies that offer, easy online course creation tools and even hosting of the course. Isn’t this what Blackboard does? I was not impressed

      • tomwhyte1 8:05 pm on September 13, 2012 | Log in to Reply

        I see what you are getting at, however I have a different opinion between Blackboard and a Cloud Based Application. Blackboard is a Learning Management System. I go, get information, maybe take a quiz, maybe have a working “chat room”, post comments, upload assignments, get grades. Basically, an electronic version of a traditional classroom. Where as cloud based applications, like Google Docs, simulate traditional software, such as MS Word, that would be entirely housed on your PC, but can be accessed from anywhere.

        Yes they have similarities, need the Internet, function regardless of computers operating system. But LMS’s facilitate learning, where as true cloud based applications facilitate the creation of learning artifacts.

        Thoughts?

  • Doug Connery 8:51 pm on September 11, 2012
    0 votes
    |

    Tags: , , , Internet of htings, , mobiles, personal web, , semantic, smart objects   

    I reviewed the New Media Consortium 2012 Horizon Report for Higher Education. At first glance of the website, I was impressed as they have the report not only in English but also in four other languages: Catalan, German, Japanese and Spanish. Also, they have two shorter documents: The Project  Preview and The Project  Short List. […]

    Continue reading Opportunity Horizon: Perhaps the Horizon reports are overly optimistic ….. Posted in: Week 02: The Edtech Marketplace
     
    • adi 3:18 pm on September 13, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      Hi Doug,

      You’ve done a very thorough job, and it was a great idea to go back to previous reports to see if their predictions come about. They do actually say it is “not a predictive tool”, but rather it is meant to “highlight emerging technologies” (p.7). However, when I read predictions thrashing the Kindle Fire and writing wonder of Ipads, I knew there was something more. I checked them out, and though the NMC is a non for profit organization, it was nevertheless founded by Adobe, Apple, Macromedia and Sony, because the realized that “realized that the ultimate success of their multimedia-capable products depended upon their widespread acceptance by the higher education community ” (NMC.org). They concluded “that a community of innovators embedded in leading colleges and universities would amplify the impact of their tools in a wide range of disciplines” (NMC.org).h They went on to identify institutions and schools where their investment could “bear fruit”. So are these predictions of what the market or educators will need or what they hope they will buy? Either way, there is some truth in what they write. Like the OECD, they recognize a changing world of work and roles. People work anywhere and collaboratively, opening way for the need for clouds and collaborative communication tools. And I think the other thing they may be right with is the growth in tablet computing and Apps. We’ll have to wait and see.

      Adriana

    • kstackhouse 1:39 pm on September 14, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      I was also interested to see that they were a bit optimistic in their reports about what would be in use down the road. I think that the report is helpful in looking at what might be a resource to watch for. I also don’t blame them if their predictions were a little off. The technologies have been in place for say Mobile Apps long enough to have been “adopted”. Adoption though is up to the institutions and policy makers. I’m sure that the learners and many educators have been waiting for some of these tools to be adopted.

    • jhodi 4:01 pm on September 14, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      I also found that the timelines to adoption may be a little ambitious, but I focused more on the ideas than the time to adoption. The technologies and ideas provided are get at inspiring thoughts about future technologies and potential technologies to follow and keep an eye on. Several of these technologies have popped up here and there over the years, but have yet to become a staple in every institution. ‘Adoption’ is hard to pinpoint, but it is interesting to observe the examples and see which institutions have adopted various technologies with success and failure.

  • Colin 8:50 pm on September 11, 2012
    0 votes
    |

    Tags: Top 10 ED tech predictions, ZD net   

    For my critical analysis I have chosen ZD net’s Top 10 ED tech predictions for 2011. Obviously this is an older article so it is interesting to look at what was predicted as being top ED tech for 2011. I also searched and found several articles relating to that one “The top 5 ed tech […]

    Continue reading ZD Net Posted in: Week 02: The Edtech Marketplace
     
    • avninder 9:55 am on September 12, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      I think making predictions always involves making assumptions. And as David mentioned in a recent post a lot of us are drawn to fancier devices even though their use may not be as practical as a technology that rates low on the interest scale.

      I find it difficult to say which trend prediction has materialized as different areas in the field of educational technology may be attracted to different devices. For example: interactive clickers are becoming more commonly used in higher education and corporate training but not so much in the K-12 system. This could be because the class size doesn’t warrant its use and/or because the budget simply isnt there.

    • tomwhyte1 12:44 pm on September 12, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      I also noticed your comment regarding the failed outcomes of the predictions, which reminds me of old movies predicting what the future will be like. For example, Back To The Future 2 – occurs on October 21, 2015. Yes, I realize we have 3 years to go, but I doubt that we will have that level of 3D occur for any new Jaws Movies before then…

      As well, I really appreciated the explanation you provide. For these predictions are based on a somewhat domino effect, and any misstep will delay or derail the entire system.

      Thanks for sharing.

    • Mike Rae 11:27 pm on September 12, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      Predicting anything is tough. I could predict that the sun is going to rise in the east tomorrow, and people would shoot me “duhh, thanks Captain Obvious” looks. On the contrary, the more bold the prediction, the less it is likely to happen, (after the prediction doesn’t come true, you are bound to get the “Well you really missed the boat on that one”). I guess the key is finding ones that you think are obvious, but others might not – and then of course be right about it.

      @Tomwhyte: I agree with your point about the domino effect. Some of these trends need to happen before other ones (or at least together with them), so if one doesn’t come through as predicted neither will the other one.

      • tomwhyte1 8:45 am on September 13, 2012 | Log in to Reply

        I agree with your statements, but would like add that I feel it is human nature when making predictions to go big, either positively (self-driving cars) or negatively (swine flu). My issue though, is people get tired of these predictions, relegate the information to background noise, then ignore the issue(s) entirely. Which I feel is one of the reasons why many educators drag their collective feet in regards to educational technology, for some in changes to fast, for others it never happens how they were told it was going to work.

        Thereby, creating false information, and negative feelings.

        Thoughts?

  • tomwhyte1 7:37 pm on September 11, 2012
    0 votes
    |

    Tags: , future, trend   

    For this critical analysis, I have selected Connie Malamed’s piece entitled “Learning Technology Trends To Watch In 2012”, which highlights potential educational trends for instructors and students based upon the convergence of informal and social media, as well as the increased use of smartphones and tablets within multiple learning environments, and the impact each may […]

    Continue reading Where Were Going We Don’t Need Roads (The future paths of education?) Posted in: Week 02: The Edtech Marketplace
     
    • Colin 9:46 pm on September 12, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      Hi Tom, I definitely agree that I found the material generally a review of what I know mixed in with some new facts. I don’t feel that her site is very cutting edge and I noticed that she didn’t put the date on any articles on when they were written.

    • jkotler 3:13 am on September 13, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      Hi Tom,
      While I admit I did not read Malamed’s piece in its entirety, I believe you have done a great job in reviewing the key technologies. Within that, I can appreciate how you often brought it back to what would be useful to general educators as I too have often found many are unfamiliar and uncomfortable with various new technologies, and so fail to implement them despite their potential benefits. In your opinion, what would be the best approach to change that trend?

  • Scott 6:48 pm on September 11, 2012
    0 votes
    |

    Tags: Google, ,   

    No doubt some of you also noticed this announcement from Google today regarding its foray into open-source course building tools for education. If you missed the announcement or would like to learn more, you can follow the link below: http://edudemic.com/2012/09/google-course-builder Cheers, Scott.  

    Continue reading Google Open Source Course Builder Posted in: Blog Café, Week 02: The Edtech Marketplace
     
    • David Vogt 8:46 pm on September 12, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      How could anyone, even Google, improve on PowerPoint as a course building tool? 😉

      Seriously, Google rarely launches duds, but I’m worried about this one. I’m looking forward to some critical reviews from our MET-resident experts…

    • jkotler 3:01 am on September 13, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      Hi Scott,

      Thank you for sharing that link. I actually was unaware that Google was launching a course builder but after reading the article and taking a quick glance at it, I am hesitant that it will offer something better than many other open-source platforms already out there. In any case, I am interested to see what type of response it gets.

    • teacherben 12:09 am on September 14, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      Google has been playing in this sandbox for a bit. GApps integrates well with a number of Learning Management Systems, including Moodle, and last year, they released a product called OpenClass together with Pearson.

      http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/pearson-and-google-jump-into-learning-management-systems/33636

      Don;t know how this new course builder fits into the ecosystem, but it wouldn’t be the first time Google has released a number of different products that overlap.

      I had a look at it but it looks like I will need a JavaScript refresher to make any use of it–ughh!

    • Eva Ziemsen 10:06 am on September 20, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      Hi Scott, Thanks for sharing. I checked it out. I hope that they refine things to be less tech-heavy. It would be more attractive for someone like myself, who would use this in a heartbeat, but not if it means I need to know HTML or Java, etc. I guess we will see what happens. Eva

    • melissaayers 7:19 am on October 3, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      Thanks for sharing that Scott. I can not see this being too popular with the majority of learning professionals if it potentially requires Javascript and Python skills, these are not something you can just pickup in 5 minutes. Out of curiosity however I joined their Power Searching with Google course to see what it was like. It was very clear, easily to follow and had multiple delivery formats (text & video) for the content which was nice and I have to admit I did learn a few new things 🙂

  • jenbarker 10:27 pm on September 10, 2012
    0 votes
    |
     

    How, and how much, is it useful and valuable to the broader community of educators, as well as learning technologies specialists and venturers? Today I reviewed a post from the blogazine (a new term for me, used by the author of this blog) eLearning Coach, titled “Learning Technology Trends To Watch in 2012”.   My […]

    Continue reading eLearning Coach “Learning Technology Trends To Watch in 2012” Posted in: Week 02: The Edtech Marketplace
     
    • avninder 10:05 am on September 12, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      I reviewed the same article and would have to agree with your critique. Like you, I also mentioned that a venturer would have to do a lot more research before having enough information to make sound decisions.

    • tomwhyte1 12:49 pm on September 12, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      I would have also liked to have seen examples on potential use of these technologies. Like was mentioned in the Educase article. For I have found, that by providing teachers with a concrete example of how the technology might be used, provides a strong foundation for future brainstorming sessions.

      Thoughts?

    • jenbarker 5:47 pm on September 12, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      I think she is unable to provide specific educational/classroom setting examples because I do not think her reviews are meant for K-12 educators. Perhaps I am wrong, but I don’t see how backchanneling could be used in Elementary schools (at least at the primary level).

      • tomwhyte1 8:11 am on September 13, 2012 | Log in to Reply

        I can see that, with tools like twitter and Facebook. However, our division has begun successfully using Edmodo to instruct some of our classes, which could facilitate a back channel like atmosphere for younger students.

        Thoughts?

    • jenbarker 5:49 pm on September 12, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      Another challenge would be that most students don’t have laptops or mobile devices at their disposal. As schools move to BYOD (bring your own device) this hopefully will change.

      • tomwhyte1 8:14 am on September 13, 2012 | Log in to Reply

        True, but by having enough technology to facilitate a back channel for students, potentially creates the issue of this occurring during class, a modern version of note passing I guess.

        Thoughts?

    • Mike Rae 9:11 pm on September 12, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      in the to 5 Ed Tech predictions for 2012 article of ZDnet (not the 2011 one critiqued by this class), BYOD is one that Chris Dawson sees coming. Dawson sees K-12 schools becoming more like universities in this sense.

    • Ranvir 6:30 pm on September 15, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      I agree that the predictions are valuable only if they are based on factual data to support them. Although, I haven’t gone through the article myself, the list provided does seem to align well with Horizon Report from last few years. Having said that, educators and venture capitalists need more concrete information such about the market size, who is using it, competition, etc in order to decide whether they would like to invest their time and money. In fact I really liked the Cube framework and look forward to reports that follow that paradigm.

  • Jonathan 9:15 pm on September 10, 2012
    0 votes
    |
     

    ZDNet’s Top 10 Education Tech predictions for 2011 provides a brief look at some possible trends in the upcoming years.  I believe this article provides more “food for thought” as opposed to a solid launching platform for venturers or organizations to base their purchasing decisions off of.  The list compiled by Adam Garry, Dell’s manager […]

    Continue reading Value in Ed Tech Predictions? Posted in: Week 02: The Edtech Marketplace
     
    • Mike Rae 8:56 pm on September 12, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      Good synopsis Jonathan…when I read this of yours: ‘Most educators if not all I’m sure would agree they would love each one of these points, but the main question becomes, “how”?’, it reminded me that I was thinking the same thing while reading, but must have forgot to put it in my notes, as I left it out of my post. I thought that reading about a lot of these things might go as far as to frustrate educators, as now they see what is out there (or what is going to be out there), but they don’t have the ability to necessarily make it happen. Those decisions of instituting some of these trends are not at the ground level. I suspect a lot of teachers (I did), might feel more upset about their respective schools for not making more of the discussed initiatives.

    • Jonathan 8:41 pm on September 13, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      Mike –
      I just caught up with your post and couldn’t agree more on a lot of the comments you made, especially the one about the Dell’s involvement in the article and plugging their own product.

      What comes to mind with regards to teachers not being the buyers or the the students for that matter is that we aren’t given much of a say. Quick story. I wanted to install Scratch (open source MIT – introduce simple programming in the form of Lego like blocks) onto our Mac Labs. I was encountered with a barrage of issues. Admin had to inquire with tech services. I was denied without a reason. On another day, I ran into the Tech Specialist that goes to schools to incorporate technology into classrooms, and she was more frustrated than me. She notes that on her own computer, she has to approve applications before they are installed on her computer. Her job is to assist teachers and blend curriculum with tech. She explained the process to me as somewhat of an application process for different computer apps (Macs and less so for iPads). Applications are submitted to a panel to review in the summer time. Some time (once a year) the panel meets to discuss viable apps. Once decisions are made they are final for the year.

      What baffles me is that.. here at my school I want to incorporate 21st Century Learning and I am denied the opportunity. How frustrating is this? The tech specialist’s job is to incorporate tech, and she isn’t being allowed to do her job properly for fear that we may install buggy software. I’ve since found a way around this, but it’s frustrating and discouraging.

      Okay maybe not that short 🙂

    • teacherben 11:42 pm on September 13, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      Hi Jonathan,

      This doesn’t help with the bigger picture, but if you have a few USB sticks around, you can install Scratch to those. I just tried it and it works. You run the installer and drag the file to the USB instead of the Applications folder. Bit cheeky, but you do what you gotta do sometimes…

    • Jonathan 1:14 pm on September 15, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      Ben —

      I love the creative solutions that we have to come up with to get around the “red tape” (is this what it is?) Great solution, I went backwards and burned them onto a bunch of CDs. I like the USB idea though, so that the students can bring them home and save work on them, but at the time ADMIN wanted to keep costs a bit lower. I think it’s more possible now though.

      The fact that we have to go to these lengths to do implement this vision of “21st Learning” is baffling and discouraging to other teachers that want to get into the technology game. Doing this stuff “should be easier” not harder. We shouldn’t be sneaking around like bandits just to provide our students with a positive learning experience.

      Side note: I just received an iPad from my admin to test implementation into the classroom. I spent last night going perusing the “Approved Apps” that the district had given a check to. I felt like creating a folder called “Useless” and dumping many of them in there 🙂 I’m probably still huffing and puffing fumes from my denial of Scratch and an approval of an app on the iPad called “ChoiceMaker”. Bless the developers that created it but the app simply flickers a “YES” “NO” sign at you after you press the “Go” button. I should be clear this app isn’t completely useless but pedagogically speaking — this is more of a sound app than Scratch? Really? 🙂

      Okay I’ll stop being such a grouch. I thought it was just amusing 🙂

    • Ranvir 6:05 pm on September 15, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      I believe Dawson’s predictions are coming true to a large extent in terms of plummeting costs of text books and tablet devices. E-textbooks are gaining popularity with major publishers providing ePub version of textbooks available that can be viewed in popular eReader software. Also, cost of ebooks is generally less than conventional books. Moreover, many publishers are allowing students to rent books at a discounted price for a certain duration rather than buy every book they need. Finally, more reasonably priced tablets are available today such as Google Nexus and Kindle Fire that are under $200 price tag and enable an average student to have them in their backpack.

  • jhodi 3:37 pm on September 10, 2012
    0 votes
    |
     

      How, and how much, is it useful and valuable to the broader community of educators, as well as learning technologies specialists and venturers?   The 2012 Horizon Report is useful to educators, learning technologies specialists, and venturers on a few levels.  First, it provides educators of all ages with an appropriate report applicable to […]

    Continue reading What is on the Technology Horizon in 2012? Posted in: Week 02: The Edtech Marketplace
     
  • David Vogt 7:22 am on September 10, 2012
    0 votes
    |

    Tags: , , , , , W2   

    Hi everyone – hope you had a fine weekend. Thanks for diving in to the course and introducing yourselves.  We’ve clearly gathered an exceptional group of learning adventurers for this journey together – I’m looking forward to our shared experience. Our second week is about getting primed for working in the world of global education […]

    Continue reading Welcome to Week #2! Posted in: Announcements, Week 02: The Edtech Marketplace
     
  • jkotler 2:52 am on September 10, 2012
    0 votes
    |

    Tags: cube, , inclusive, tablets, textbook   

    Overall, the research reports put forth by Educause are very useful and can be of great value to a wide range of educators, learning technology specialists and venturers. More specifically, one of the main reasons it is so insightful, especially in comparison to other reports or market projections, is because instead of giving a general […]

    Continue reading The Value of Educause Posted in: Week 02: The Edtech Marketplace
     
    • avninder 12:53 pm on September 10, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      It sounds like your report was a lot more detailed than the one I read (Learning Technology Trends to Watch in 2012). I’d have to agree that these reports have been designed with a broad audience in mind. As a corporate trainer though I’ve noticed that many technologies and can be used in different learning environments effectively.

      • tomwhyte1 12:29 pm on September 12, 2012 | Log in to Reply

        I would agree that most, if not all technologies can be used within multiple levels. However, in my experience I have noticed that teachers are more comfortable when they are given a concrete situational example to begin with.

        Thoughts?

    • tomwhyte1 12:27 pm on September 12, 2012 | Log in to Reply

      I like how Educase breaks down the technology, into what it is, what it can do, and who is using it. This approach would provide instructors at all levels an entry point to either introduce themselves to the technology, enhance knowledge, and begin making connections to learn how to deploy it for themselves.

      I would also like to see what this might look like for K-12.

      What are your thoughts on why they have only focused on Higher Ed?

c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel

Spam prevention powered by Akismet