This week has been distinguished by the exceptionally good Access 2011 conference. The program is something that I think every member of #libr511 could identify with, please look at it. Please think about it. We need to converse back to the school about what it represents, somewhat in context to the ‘cataloguing and classification’ curriculum certainly.
I could discuss a lot of the program, so could a few other attendees from the #libr511 cohort, check out the topic on twitter. I will directly comment on the keynote.
As the vision for “The University” takes shape (I think we are treating “the Library” as part and parcel of “the University”) discussions of access, ownership and preservation roll. Does it shock when a speak takes exception to the word access? I truly am dependent on every moment of bubble bursters and those who give us focus. I think Jon Beasley-Murray did that this morning.
He unequivocally centred the library with other public activity that is difficult, anticapitalist and productive. The to do list was short and I question if we are committed to it. Libraries must,
- Provoke criticism
- Remain central to models of ownership (and content creation) digital AND PHYSICAL
- Allow for space for reading
I believe the repository function is core the diversifcation of content creation; a protection from the overly agressive systems of commercial content mills (Pearson, Blackboard, Scholastic, HarperCollins, Apple, et al.) The very mechanic of library selection is a sort of ballast on a future that could be dominated by robotic access only.
“Access is not enough.”
Especially as we drift towards the exit assignment on good catalogues, assign #7, you do need to cement the understanding on the history of library/information retrieval systems. What drives the UI in terms of index technology, staff roles for workflow and total return on investment in catalogue data, usually by genre/collection.
This is a perfect graphic to add to the discussion of the ILS. Timelines are nice click on the pic to see the original post from @mbreeding .
Follow the link to the full graphic
A post I cannot help but recommend as we get going past the discussion of transcription http://go-to-hellman.blogspot.com/2011/07/library-data-why-bother.html
The clarity it looks like most students reached on the complex, interpretive areas of transcription (as in title) versus the exhausting straightforward data elements (like pagination). What other systems do not have ‘built in’ is the tiering out of the capturable information on resources.
The important post from Karen Coyle’s blog I urged you to consider last class. Please if you do not know who Karen Coyle is look something up and learn about her work.
XML and Library Data Future
There is sometimes the assumption that the future data carrier for library data will be XML…
ps.. Might choose to update this blog title to Urge you to consider.