The Results!

Posted by: | February 1, 2007 | 37 Comments

Due to a hole in WordPress, this post’s author is misattributed. The follow was written by former Insiders editor Gina Eom.

Student Legal Fund Society:
Sadowski, Elizabeth 674
Escobar 623
Bird (?) 547
Sihota 545
Bendayar 497

Senate:
Jaspreet Khangura 1588
Tariq Ahmed 430
Alfie Lee 1070
Hillson Tse 1059
Peter Pan 996

Board of Governors:
Jeff Friedrich 1386
Darren Peets 849
——-
Aidha Shaikh 842 (7 vote difference! Recount=???)

VP Finance:
Brittany Tyson 1891
——————
Peter Rizov 1260

VP Admin:
Sarah Naiman 1436
—————
(Suvina To 992, Lougheed the Barbarian 567)

VP External:
Matthew Naylor 1017
———————
Joel Koczawarski 915
Thomas Masterson 695
Chris Brush 670

VP Academic:
Brendon Goodmurphy 1510
————————–
Bruce Kraenhoff 810
Jerry Fan Fan 787

President:
Jeff Friedrich 2653
——————–
Maxwell Maxwell 882

VFM:
1) Underground
2) Thunderbird
3) The Knoll
4) The 432
5) Let them Eat Cake
6) Elections Erections Magazine
7) Elections Insider
8) Duncan Kearney Media Group

I’m drunk so I may have made spelling errors. I love you Antoine.

Lots of really good pictures tomorrow!

voter turnout was so low….


Comments

37 Comments so far

  1. Alfie on February 1, 2007 6:53 am

    Thank you so much for all the background information about the UBC campus that you have provided!
    I have learnt much more information about the inner-working of UBC than I would have ever imagined. These three weeks are truly an unforgettable learning experience.

  2. Alfie on February 1, 2007 6:53 am

    Thank you so much for all the background information about the UBC campus that you have provided!
    I have learnt much more information about the inner-working of UBC than I would have ever imagined. These three weeks are truly an unforgettable learning experience.

  3. Claudia on February 1, 2007 7:33 am

    “I love you Antoine.”

    HAHAH. gina. oy. good night. congratulations to the winners.

  4. Claudia on February 1, 2007 7:33 am

    “I love you Antoine.”

    HAHAH. gina. oy. good night. congratulations to the winners.

  5. Peter on February 1, 2007 7:43 am

    I second that:
    Congrats to all the winners! Have a great year. Don’t you dare disappoint!

    Good luck!

  6. Peter on February 1, 2007 7:43 am

    I second that:
    Congrats to all the winners! Have a great year. Don’t you dare disappoint!

    Good luck!

  7. Alex on February 1, 2007 8:24 am

    Seconding the whole being drunk thing.

    Hooray for democracy!

  8. Mike Thicke on February 1, 2007 8:34 am

    Fuck.

  9. Mike Thicke on February 1, 2007 8:34 am

    Fuck.

  10. Fire Hydrant on February 1, 2007 8:42 am

    On the recount thing: I understand they counted the Board ballots a few times just to be sure, so it should be pretty robust.

  11. Fire Hydrant on February 1, 2007 8:42 am

    On the recount thing: I understand they counted the Board ballots a few times just to be sure, so it should be pretty robust.

  12. Anonymous on February 1, 2007 8:54 am

    Elections Insider got 7th place?

    ?!

  13. Anonymous on February 1, 2007 8:54 am

    Elections Insider got 7th place?

    ?!

  14. Anonymous on February 1, 2007 4:15 pm

    Underground came in 1st place? I can honestly say I did not hear that name once during the entire election season.

  15. Anonymous on February 1, 2007 4:15 pm

    Underground came in 1st place? I can honestly say I did not hear that name once during the entire election season.

  16. Matthew Naylor on February 1, 2007 4:28 pm

    A little disgusted as I am that EI didn’t win – you did provide the best coverage of the election. Thanks for the hard work these past couple of weeks. Ill do my best not to disapoint.

  17. Matthew Naylor on February 1, 2007 4:28 pm

    A little disgusted as I am that EI didn’t win – you did provide the best coverage of the election. Thanks for the hard work these past couple of weeks. Ill do my best not to disapoint.

  18. Shawn on February 1, 2007 5:29 pm

    I know I probably slurred it incessantly last night but your publication was by far the most informative and well thought out. I really apprecaited your coverage. And reallllly if more students were as informed as you are, or even as I’ve become in the last few weeks (through pretty minimal effort actually) they would be better for it. On that note, I’m hung over and need hashbrowns
    -s

  19. Shawn on February 1, 2007 5:29 pm

    I know I probably slurred it incessantly last night but your publication was by far the most informative and well thought out. I really apprecaited your coverage. And reallllly if more students were as informed as you are, or even as I’ve become in the last few weeks (through pretty minimal effort actually) they would be better for it. On that note, I’m hung over and need hashbrowns
    -s

  20. James on February 1, 2007 7:08 pm

    What about the election results for other positions like Student Legal Fund?

  21. James on February 1, 2007 7:08 pm

    What about the election results for other positions like Student Legal Fund?

  22. Oker on February 1, 2007 9:03 pm

    I think it’d be naive to hope that a tight circle of friends and acquaintances would outvote the largest faculty on campus. Plus the first person perspective of EI isn’t as entertaining as a satirical look on the whole election.

    ..Oker

  23. Oker on February 1, 2007 9:03 pm

    I think it’d be naive to hope that a tight circle of friends and acquaintances would outvote the largest faculty on campus. Plus the first person perspective of EI isn’t as entertaining as a satirical look on the whole election.

    ..Oker

  24. Gina Eom on February 1, 2007 9:30 pm

    Oker I couldn’t agree more. Plus the Underground was very well done.

    For the record neither Tim nor I ever thought we would place first in this contest, nor was it our goal.

  25. Gina Eom on February 1, 2007 9:30 pm

    Oker I couldn’t agree more. Plus the Underground was very well done.

    For the record neither Tim nor I ever thought we would place first in this contest, nor was it our goal.

  26. Patrick on February 1, 2007 9:53 pm

    Anyone else see an interesting pattern in the voting?

    Jaspreet came in first with a ~500 vote margin…

    Jeff came in first for Bog with ~500 vote lead

    VP finance was ~600 votes

    VP Admin was ~500 votes

    Odd that so many positions had aproximately a 500 vote difference…

  27. Patrick on February 1, 2007 9:53 pm

    Anyone else see an interesting pattern in the voting?

    Jaspreet came in first with a ~500 vote margin…

    Jeff came in first for Bog with ~500 vote lead

    VP finance was ~600 votes

    VP Admin was ~500 votes

    Odd that so many positions had aproximately a 500 vote difference…

  28. Fire Hydrant on February 1, 2007 11:38 pm

    Incidentally, I think Tariq’s actual vote total differs from what’s up there by “1” (i.e. it’s 1430, not 430).

  29. Fire Hydrant on February 1, 2007 11:38 pm

    Incidentally, I think Tariq’s actual vote total differs from what’s up there by “1” (i.e. it’s 1430, not 430).

  30. Gina Eom on February 1, 2007 11:47 pm

    Ya, it’s an authentic error from my inebriation.

    That I will leave up.

  31. Gina Eom on February 1, 2007 11:47 pm

    Ya, it’s an authentic error from my inebriation.

    That I will leave up.

  32. Ana on February 2, 2007 8:32 pm

    what was the voter turnout?

  33. Ana on February 2, 2007 8:32 pm

    what was the voter turnout?

  34. Patrick on February 3, 2007 6:01 pm

    …low… very low…

  35. Patrick on February 3, 2007 6:01 pm

    …low… very low…

  36. Anonymous on March 5, 2007 11:22 pm

    Pfff! So much for the “new media” revolution. When campus readers want relevant journalism, they will always reach for the printed page–for now, at least.

  37. Anonymous on March 5, 2007 11:22 pm

    Pfff! So much for the “new media” revolution. When campus readers want relevant journalism, they will always reach for the printed page–for now, at least.

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Speak your mind

Spam prevention powered by Akismet