Letter Paintings
by Paige Armstrong (President 2011-12) ~ April 11th, 2012Upon entering the main gallery space at the Morris and Helen Belkin Art Gallery, the visitor is confronted with a room filled with six large-scale “Letter” paintings by Michael Morris. As the viewer walks through them, taking in their carefully hand-painted lines and use of color, fragments of the individual are captured in the v-shaped concave mirror insets embedded within the paintings. This reflective aspect is also apparent in the strips of Plexiglas that line either side of the mirror insets. The use of these reflective materials within the paintings facilitates a sort of performativity to exist, creating a peripheral effect as the individual catches glimpses of herself throughout. The use of hand-painted acrylic to create the lines provides a sense of light and gradation, suggesting that of a photographic test strip. The photography reference is especially apparent in the black and white painting on the farthest wall of the gallery space that also suggests the use of film at the time it was created.
Morris’ work appears to transcend multiple spaces including painting, photography, sculpture, performance, architecture, and poetry. It is interesting to reflect on how these paintings fit within the exhibition’s overall theme of Concrete Poetry and how they relate to the number of text pieces displayed, and in doing so, consider the relationship between the paintings and poetry. Perhaps the practice of creating Concrete Poetry exists somewhere between poetry and painting and Michael Morris’ paintings are an exploration of an intertwined relationship. Visual language seems to be of particular importance while analyzing these works as a whole. The concept of visual language is very apparent in the interpretation of Concrete Poetry because it provides an answer to the question of how it is to be read. Should the viewer not read the words the same way she would read a painting, taking in the compositional elements of line, shape, color, form, pattern, direction, orientation, scale, space and proportion? Or maybe the difficulty in reading the work lies in attempting to challenge the conventions of the written word, paragraph, or text, with which the viewer is constantly confronted in today’s society. Morris’ paintings present yet another challenge in how they should be considered alongside Concrete Poetry. One connection that can be made between the works is the “Letter” paintings and the examples of Concrete Poetry that attempt to occupy multiple spaces. As suggested, concrete poetry lies somewhere in the space between that of poetry and painting whereas Morris’ paintings attempt to do the same but reference other elements including photography, sculpture, performance, and architecture. There is an historical sense of time captured in the use of colour from the influence of photography and film. The colours of each individual painting reference the city they are titled after: Rome, Paris, New York, Madrid, Beijing, and Los Angeles. The softer use of line and colour counters the hard-edge painting style of the time.
The aspect of performativity appears to be a key element in the paintings. Morris has constructed these works to almost exist as mini-environments within themselves, in front of which, the viewer could imagine the influence of dance and movement. Morris has created a platform in which the movement of the body through the space is central. In viewing these works and considering the use of material, the visitor must also be aware of how her body functions within the space created. In doing so, the relationship between Concrete Poetry and the paintings can be seen as they both function as an intertwined relationship within multiple spaces.
By Paige Armstrong
This project was done in collaboration with the Morris and Helen Belkin Art Gallery and the Visual Arts Student’s Association.





