Category Archives: Involvement / Leadership

What if everyone at UBC took part in an Anti-Oppression Workshop?

What if milk chocolate had the nutritional benefits of broccoli? What if Harry Potter died as a child instead, and Voldemort took over the world*?  Posing such questions can be an amusing pastime, and as you may have guessed by now, purely imaginative.  Indeed, I think compulsory attendance at an anti-oppression workshop would prove disastrous.  But I think these workshops are worth thinking about, so I’ll share my experience and reflections.

What is it?

This weekend I participated an anti-oppression workshop as part of the Sexual Assault Support Centre’s volunteer training.  I’ve actually taken part in two similar ones before, but each one is different.  I’m writing here with an after-the-fact, reflective, and detached edge. In other words, a reflective-judgemental one, a viewpoint that I wouldn’t dare bring into the safe space we created in the workshop.

These workshops help us understand particular acts of domination through the broader perspective of oppressive power systems.  For instance, it helps us  locate particular acts of domination like sexist remarks demeaning the rational capacity of women or ableist architecture designed without adequate support to get around comfortably, under general institutional and societal frameworks of oppression.  Not only that, but we often look at the intersectionality of oppressive systems (i.e. where the oppressive systems meet at their joints); how being both white and poor can mean living through different experiences than being white but not poor, or poor but not white.

Of course, in such a short timespan, you can’t exactly go Foucault on the power relations at play, or critique it up Marx-style (that’s what my theoretical philosophy courses are for!)  before you dive right into and engage with the manifest realities of dominating power structures.  We often participate in components like “Flower Power”: an exercise where you locate yourself in relation to the dominant power structures in areas such as ethnicity, culture, social class, sex, sexuality, etc.  You get to know what invisible unearned powers you have (otherwise known as privileges), and what unearned penalties you have.  We sometimes participate in components like “Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack”: an exercise where you step forwards or backwards depending on how much privilege you have.  Some examples are:

0“ If you ever attended a private school or summer camp take one step forward.” (Source).
0“If you generally think of the police as people that you can call on for help in times of emergency take one step forward.” (Source).
0″If you were ever embarrassed or ashamed of your clothes, your house or your family car when growing up take one step backward.” (Source).
0“ [If you]…can swear, or dress in second hand clothes, or not answer letters, without having people attribute these choices to the bad morals, the poverty or the illiteracy of [your] race [take one step forward].” (Source).
0“ [If you] can take a job with an affirmative action employer without having [your] co-workers on the job suspect that [you] got it because of [your] race [take one step forward]. “(Source).

Experience and Reflections

I find that in all of my experiences, I go through similar strains of thoughts–which means I need to get them out of my system so I can stop thinking about them and start thinking fresh ideas!

First and foremost, I find it truly eye-opening (and you can imagine the first time I did this!) how other people suffer the little thing in ways I’ve never even had to think about.  For example,  never would I have thought that constantly shut down elevators could be more than just a mere  ”inconvenience” but an actual roadblock for people who cannot go up stairs.  (I remember visiting Paris this summer and lamenting over how there are so few elevators in antique buildings!)  If you’re not in that position where you have to think about it, you simply don’t.  And that lack of awareness actually reinforces the problems for those who do.

I know a lot of people feel really guilty going through this portion of the experience.  I think this is where my optimistic side kicks in, and I start thinking about ways in which I can help make my community more safe, more accessible, less oppressive.

Second, I notice the ways in which I have felt the effects of oppressive systems.  I feel somehow…relieved.  I know, at least, that it’s okay to be frustrated about the “little things,” and that I shouldn’t blame myself for picking them out previously.

I also think of how awesome the people in the room are, and how safe a space this feels, and “why can’t there be more community spaces where we can feel like this?”  Our classrooms would be less tense, our social spaces less hurtful, UBC actually awesome.

Then kick in my detached thoughts.

What does “oppression” mean, then?  It’s typically used to describe the dominating force of power on a group’s “negative liberties”/”freedom from external constraints”.  Is it fair to apply the term oppression to (some of those experiences) better explained in terms of “positive liberties”/”freedom from internal constraints”? The language of oppression (and of liberty, for that matter) directs our thoughts in certain directions, and if this is “oppression,” then there could be a great deal of implications…

And how do I explain the second thoughts I have after the feeling of being relieved, second thoughts like, “deal with it, it’s not that bad”?  Do they have to do with my own internalization of “oppression”? Or are they legitimate critiques of a (and I would never judge others like this, but as master of my own experiences and as a self-critical, maybe even self-blaming, judge)…self-affirming, excuse?

Silly things like that in silly sentences like that, which no one can follow.

As you can tell, I find that anti-oppression workshops are really effective and fascinating exercises and I would recommend anyone who has a genuine interest in caring to check it out.

*By the way, if any Harry Potter fans can explain to me what the whole deal was with “love” saving Harry as a little boy (and how the hell he got a horcrux inside him as opposed to death), I will owe you one.  I think I may have figured this out at one point but every time I come up with a theory again, I end up refuting it.
Edit Jan 24th, 2012: Nevermind, I found out the answer.  So not satisfying. 

Interuniversity Conference on Education 2011

This is more of a response than a review, so if you didn’t go to this student-driven conference on innovating education on Saturday, it will be like reading a sequel for a novel you’ve never read.  Never fear—I chuck you people towards Tyler’s blog and the website if you’re interested in the concept.

*Chucks*

Now that those people are gone, let’s be frank.  I chucked those people out of here because a) I don’t like summarizing things and b) I’m writing a few thoughts in random point-form.

0 There was something itching at me the whole time…I have a couple prejudices that make the whole concept of innovating education challenging for me:

Privilege Bias: I am priveleged under several aspects of the current system.  I get good grades as it is.  My learning style is suited to typical lecture-style, cut and dry teaching.  So, I might have this selfish prejudice against changing things.

Status Quo Bias : See Tyler’s post.  This is really big, especially in conjunction with the  fact that there are many other problems and broken systems we could be working towards solving.  I suppose it’s implicit when you go to a conference like this that you think it’s important but I always like to ask why.  Why should I/we focus on this topic in particular?  Are we appealing to justice and fairness, equality, truth, functionality/efficiency, or something else—and is it really such a pressing issue? (For example, we might understand why developing skills > information processing but why is it important? Is it because it will somehow make our workforce more efficient, is it because we’re going to stall in terms of being a forward-looking society,  or is it because we simply find inherent value in perfection?  And, given these reasons, how does it compare with other problems?)  I feel like these questions weren’t asked or answered, and understandably so because they’re  party pooper questions.

o I got about 100 pages into a introductory Macro-Economics textbook this summer (for fun) before I became really busy, but those 100 pages were fascinating enough.  There were all these concepts and assumptions within economics that I see as patterns in society today.  One of these is the notion of “specialization.”  I recall the textbook arguing for the benefits of specialization—after all, an economy is more efficient when 3 people specialize in 3 different areas than when 3 people are well-rounded in all 3 areas.  You can see where the university has adopted this and the consequences it entails.  My point is that our institutions are shaped by political, social, economic, and scientific ideas…ideas are malleable and so are our institutions…OK so I thought I would have more to say on this point but apparently not.

o Moving forward: In Dr.Rawn’s talk, we learned about the process of implementing change.  She openly admitted that she made mistakes when starting up her new course.  Mistakes happen along the way.  And I think it’s precisely those mistakes that are most feared—I don’t think it’s lack of leaders who care about better education, I don’t think it’s lack of resources, but the implications of making mistakes in something as life-changing as education.  This, coupled with the problem of the Status Quo, poses quite the challenge.

o The problem with the word “innovating” is that it makes me think of shiny new buildings, toasters, and the future.  When I think of one my most successful learning experiences, Arts One, I would say that it’s more traditional than anything.  It brought us back to the notion of a university as a talking circle, an open conversation, a place to read together and learn together.  We didn’t have twitter in the classroom, we didn’t have group projects, we didn’t do anything new.  Moral of the story: beware of the words we use.

I was going to give a quick review of the different sections in Haiku form, but I am suddenly incredibly stressed out and leave that idea for any other pseudo-poets to pursue!

 

F Word Undergraduate Conference Review

My brother and I wrote a joint-review on the F Word (Feminist) conference.  If you were there, you can check out our review in the newsletter for the Centre for Feminist Legal Studies at UBC, here (page 6).

UPDATE ON EVERYTHING EVER!!1

I realize that a blog post with updates on everything ever since you, phantom reader, last read me might not make the best reading.  But I’m going to do it anyway.  Feel free to pick and choose what to read.

Federal Elections 2011

Everyone who knows me knows how I feel about this.  My friends and I spent the entire night languishing at the results.  At first I was disappointed with  Canada, but then I remembered that the Canadian people had not decided to vote Conservative (60% did not); it was our lousy electoral system that translated a few percentage points increase in support for the Conservatives into a full-on, unchecked majority.

I’m still waiting for statistics on youth voter turnout (after voluntarily dancing like a fool for UBC’s vote mob.)  I also did some political campaigning in my riding for the experience.  I met some lovely folks, learned a little about political canvassing, and mourned collectively at the results.

World Bank International Essay Competition: 1st place winner video category

I won, I am going to Paris full expenses paid,  Amartya Sen is going to be a keynote speaker at the ABCDE Conference, and I am the luckiest person in the world.  I will update in early June with a link to my video & the discussions we will be having in Paris, no doubt, about youth immigration & world economic development.

National Day of Action For Electoral Reform (Website)

YES, YES, YES.  As Fair Vote Canada‘s representative said at the rally yesterday, this issue is a “meta-issue.”  It’s not politics, it’s changing the rules of politics.  The seemingly boring change that is electoral reform will affect everything in politics–the parties that get into power, the voices that are heard, the issues that are addressed. The rally yesterday was the most level-headed and fact-checking rally I have ever been to…some prefer the passion & the screaming, but I think we truly have reason and common sense on our side.  I hope that a century from now, we’ll look back out our “democracy” today and laugh.  Laugh at our ridiculous electoral system, our ignorance of political institutions & processes, our methods of and lack of democratic participation, media concentration and information ownership, unfair lobbying practices and the threats of capital mobility, and dismal diversity in representation.  The same way we laugh today at the so-called “democracies” of the past, wherein only certain European descendant, land-owning, men could vote.

UBC F-word conference (Website)

WOW.  The F-word Conference is an annual, full-day, free conference put on by the Women’s and Gender Studies program, featuring discussion panels, workshops, and (mostly) undergraduates sharing their research.  I’ve never taken a WMST course before, but I feel like I have; ever since volunteering with the AMS Sexual Assault Support Centre, I have become a proud feminist & engage with these issues out of class.  For those who don’t have that opportunity, take a WMST course!

This conference was truly…academic.  I would not recommend it to someone just dipping into feminist waters because there was a lot of academic lingo and the topics were narrowed & specific.  Nonetheless, I was impressed by some of the undergraduate research–makes me want to give research a try.

Point-Grey Vancouver By-election (UBC’s riding)

I really dislike provincial politics here in BC (and by that, I imply I’m not a big fan of any party…) but I followed this race.  During election night, my Twitter feed was aflutter with vote-count updates, and it became as tense and nail-biting worthy as any Canucks game.  Alas, the Liberals’ Premier won on paper, but the NDP won in actuality for making it such a tight race.

Canucks

Obligatory mention.  Go Canucks go.

Academic Courses
My average went down a few percentage points from 1st year—yes, I am the anomaly.  Most people tend to get better, but I started out strong and am fading.  Don’t worry, I’ll come back next year, what with all the fascinating philosophy courses I’m looking forward to.

PHIL 240 (epistemology): At least I know what field of philosophy I will not be engaging with in the future.
POLI 260 (international politics): Awesome prof (Farkasch) & TA, good intro to international relations.
ASIC 200 (world issues through arts and sciences): Token experimental course.  Key word: experimental; I didn’t learn that much.  Would I go back in time and take it again? Maybe.  Not at a 6-9pm time slot.
PHIL 330 (social and political philosophy): Every political science student should be forced to take this course.  Forget political theory courses, you need to look at it from a philosophical angle.  Loved it, recommend it.
PHIL 220 (symbolic logic): So, by the end, I failed an assignment (finally!) Luckily, that didn’t mean much because my grades were superb for most of the course and I somehow pulled through for the exam.  I will most definitely not continue with symbolic logic.

Hair Cut

I donated 8 inches of my hair for the first time, and it will definitely not be the last.  Not like I used it much anyway.

At the moment

I’m planning for a weekend-trip to Victoria with my high school buddies, looking for a decent job/volunteer position/something productive to do this summer, and reading for fun (Shakespeare, Pushkin, Romantic poets, Dosteovsky…so much to devour!)  Here are some of my favourite Proverbs Of Hell, selected from William Blake’s book ‘The Marriage of Heaven and Hell’:

The most sublime act is to set another before you.

Shame is Pride’s cloke.

Excess of sorrow laughs. Excess of joy weeps.

The roaring of lions, the howling of wolves, the raging of the stormy sea, and the destructive sword, are portions of eternity, too great for the eye of man.

Joys impregnate. Sorrows bring forth.

He who has suffer’d you to impose on him, knows you.

As the plow follows words, so God rewards prayers.

Much love,
Miriam

UBC residents have a unique opportunity: Provincial By-Election

I’ve been so caught up in the Federal elections, that I hadn’t even noticed that there’s a fairly important Provincial by-election in our Vancouver-Point-Grey riding, May 11th.  The newly elected leader of the BC Liberal Party, Christy Clark, is vying a seat in BC’s legislature.  She’s heading off against the BC NDP’s David Eby, an adjunct professor at UBC Law School.

Jason Payne-Png, The Province.

I don’t know what the rules are on students who are leaving residence before May*, but I know I’ll be attempting to vote anyway.  I live here 8 months of the year, which is 8 months more than Christy Clark.

While I’ve just started researching, I’m pretty sure I’ll vote for Eby.  It’s true that Christy Clark is heaps better than Gordon Campbell (what with finally increasing minimum wage, and not being pushy about the HST), but wouldn’t it be a great insult to the Liberal party & all they have/have not done these past 10 years by denying her the seat?  Besides, David Eby is pretty awesome.  And that’s not just because he seems like a crappy politician (he’s so…genuine), participated in UBC’s vote mob the other week, had a stint with the BC Civil Liberties Association, and sings Bon Jovi unashamedly in public.  No, no, if we were impressed by musical talent, we’d be voting for Stephen Harper’s Conservatives in the Federal elections, but of course we’re not! The real reason is that BC NDP policy is a much needed change to a decade of BC Liberal reign, and Eby is an outstanding candidate with some fresh new ideas.  (Not that I agree with all of them.)

In any case, take part in this historical by-election!  Well, I guess all things are technically historical, including this blogpost…but you know what I mean.

P.S. I know there are more candidates (Danielle Alie, William Gibbens, Eddie Petrossian, and Francoise Raunet), but these are the frontrunners.

*Edit:

I just called the district electoral officer.  I can vote!  Here’s how:


By-election website.
I’ve compiled information from the website here:

ELIGIBILITY

In order to vote in an election for an electoral district, an individual must:

  1. be a Canadian citizen;
  2. be 18 years of age or older on General Voting Day for the election;
  3. be a resident of the electoral district; (The district electoral officer told me that: Students, who have have been residents of the riding 6 months up to the election, are allowed to vote.  Even if you’re not coming back in September. I figure the one week between leaving residence and the election is good game…However, here’s his number if you want to double check before you bus out: 604-660-1446. )
  4. have been a resident of British Columbia for at least 6 months immediately before General Voting Day for the election
  5. be registered as a voter for the electoral district or register as such in conjunction with voting (just do it at the voting station); and
  6. not be disqualified by the Election Act or any other enactment from voting in the election or be otherwise disqualified by law

HOW TO VOTE

WHAT TO BRING?

Voters must provide:

  • one document issued by the Government of B.C. or Canada that contains the voter’s name, photograph and residential address, such as a B.C. driver’s licence or B.C. Identification Card (BCID)

OR

  • a Certificate of Indian Status

OR

  • two documents that contain the voter’s name. At least one of the documents must also contain the voter’s residential address.

More information on what types of documents are accepted here.

WHEN/WHERE?

1) General voting:

Voting places will be open from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m., Wednesday, May 11, 2011.

  1. Bayview Community School, 2251 Collingwood St, Vancouver, B.C.
  2. General Gordon Elementary School, 2896  6 Ave W, Vancouver, B.C.
  3. Kitsilano Community Centre, 2690 Larch St, Vancouver, B.C.
  4. Kitsilano Neighbourhood House, 2325  7 Ave W, Vancouver, B.C.
  5. Kitsilano Secondary School, 2550  10 Ave W, Vancouver, B.C.
  6. Lord Byng Secondary School, 3939  16 Ave W, Vancouver, B.C.
  7. Old Barn Community Centre, 6308 Thunderbird Blvd, Vancouver, B.C.
  8. Point Grey Community Church, 3512  7 Ave, Vancouver, B.C.
  9. Queen Mary Elementary School, 2000 Trimble St, Vancouver, B.C.
  10. St. Augustine’s Church, 2028  7 Ave W, Vancouver, B.C.
  11. St. James Community Square, 3214  10 Ave W, Vancouver, B.C.
  12. St. Marks Anglican Church, 1805 Larch St, Vancouver, B.C.
  13. Steeves Manor, 1985 Wallace St, Vancouver, B.C.
  14. Student Union Building, 6138 Student Union Mall, Vancouver, B.C. (Yay!)
  15. University Hill Elementary School, 5395 Chancellor Blvd, Vancouver, B.C.
  16. University Hill Secondary School, 2896 Acadia Rd, Vancouver, B.C.
  17. West Point Grey United Church, 4595  8 Ave W, Vancouver, B.C.

2) Advance voting

Advance voting will be held from Wednesday, May 4 to Saturday, May 7 from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m.

  1. Jericho Hill Centre, 4180  4 Ave W, Vancouver, B.C.
  2. Kitsilano Community Centre, 2690 Larch St, Vancouver, B.C.
  3. St. Anselm’s Anglican Church, 5210 University Blvd, Vancouver, B.C.

3) Any-day-voting

You can vote at the Vancouver-Point Grey district electoral office during office hours until 4 p.m. on May 11, 2011.

District electoral office:
Hours of Operation: Monday to Friday – 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Saturdays – 10 a.m. to 4 p.m

215 – 2678 West Broadway
(entrance on Stephens Street)
Vancouver BC V6K 2G3

3) Vote by Mail

To request a voting package, click here.

UBC YOUTH VOTE MOB

That’s right, we’re hosting one these.
You know what UBC’s YouTube video streak is like right now.
You’ll want to be there.
http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=117463898334533

Bill C-393

I’m in the middle of an essay crunch week, but I had time to send a very quick e-mail to our Conservative senators.  Consider doing it too, here.
More info on the bill here.

Dear Members of the Senate,
I have never contacted a senator before.  I am surprised that I must, but the nature of Canadian parliamentary democracy seems to be shifting these days so that I have more than one chamber to deal with.  I do not believe it is the Senate’s job to be turning down a reasonable bill from my house of elected representatives, but with all due respect, I must contact you anyway.
I am writing you concerning Bill C-393.  I am asking you and your colleagues to pass this crucial humanitarian legislation, and soon.  As you know, elections in the other chamber are imminent and I worry that this private member’s bill will not make its way through if you do not vote for it immediately.
Please do not let us down.
Sincerely,
Miriam Sabzevari
[address]
If you want to e-mail them personally (with a potential for response), these are most most of the Conservative senators’ emails:
andrer@sen.parl.gc.ca, anguswd@sen.parl.gc.ca, boisvp@sen.parl.gc.ca, braled@sen.parl.gc.ca, brazep@sen.parl.gc.ca, brownb@sen.parl.gc.ca, carigc@sen.parl.gc.ca, cochre@sen.parl.gc.ca, comeag@sen.parl.gc.ca, tessil@sen.parl.gc.ca, dininc@sen.parl.gc.ca, johnse@sen.parl.gc.ca, mikeduffy@sen.parl.gc.ca, eatonn@sen.parl.gc.ca, finled@sen.parl.gc.ca, fortis@sen.parl.gc.ca, greens@sen.parl.gc.ca, johnsj@sen.parl.gc.ca,
lacomd@sen.parl.gc.ca
, , fruml@sen.parl.gc.ca, kochhv@sen.parl.gc.ca, langd@sen.parl.gc.ca, lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca, mannif@sen.parl.gc.ca, marshe@sen.parl.gc.ca, martin@sen.parl.gc.ca, meighen@sen.parl.gc.ca, mocklp@sen.parl.gc.ca, murral@sen.parl.gc.ca, mcgeed@sen.parl.gc.ca,
neufer@sen.parl.gc.ca
, nolinp@sen.parl.gc.ca, ogilvk@sen.parl.gc.ca, olived@sen.parl.gc.ca, patted@sen.parl.gc.ca, plettd@sen.parl.gc.ca, poirir@sen.parl.gc.ca, rainen@sen.parl.gc.ca, rivarm@sen.parl.gc.ca, runcib@sen.parl.gc.ca, kfl@sen.parl.gc.ca, seidmj@sen.parl.gc.ca, stgerg@sen.parl.gc.ca, stewac@sen.parl.gc.ca,
stratt@sen.parl.gc.ca
, tkachd@sen.parl.gc.ca,
wallaj@sen.parl.gc.ca
, wallinp@sen.parl.gc.ca

More contact info here.

—–

Response rate so far: 1/48

The Hon. Lowell Murray says he supports the bill and asked it to be fast-tracked.  He considers the actions of the Conservative government regarding this bill “unconscionable and disgraceful.”

SLC Haikus

Haikus about my more memorable moments.  My inspiration comes from this:

Haikus are easy
But sometimes they make no sense
Refrigerator

[and I think someone else did haikus on the Blogsquad before?]

(Drew Dudley)

The CV owns us
Lead by breaking from its chains
NOM NOM lollipop

(Lunch)

Picture a sandwich
So delicious, so tasty
Turkey Cranberry

(Slam Poetry)

Slam Poetry will
Rock your soul like nothing else
Experience it

(The Buried Life)

The boys who said no
To conceding, or losing
Are plenty pretty

[I'm sorry, I had to mention it.]

And for the record, I thought the theme this year was inspiring.  Last year, it was way too cheesy.  I didn’t blog about it at the time, but I found it somewhat self-aggrandizing.  Thankfully some genius came up with ‘Rethinking Leadership’ this year.

What I’ve done and what to do

1.  WHAT I’VE BEEN (NOT) DOING THIS SUMMER

I was  in hibernation since my last blog post.
OK, no, but I really wish that bear we saw on our driveway was.  (North Vancouver folks, no need to fear, UBC campus only has raccoons, eagles, squirrels, pigeons, giant birds in the skies that look like cranes, etc.)

I just read Paulina’s blog post and my summer, too, has consisted of only unglamorous things: working for the family, reading, painting, sewing, eternal job hunting, and so forth.  I don’t feel bad about this idleness,  but I don’t feel good about it either.  I’m getting my act together soon though, promise!

2.  WHAT YOU AND I CAN DO NEXT YEAR

Erica and Mel already provided some great info on their  involvement and there’s even more out there!
Check out this great resource sheet– Google the different opportunities listed for you on the second page.  Better yet, I believe this is a brand new involvement website and it has been good to me so far.

3.  WHAT I’M GOING TO DO TOMORROW

I’ve picked up the popular book ‘The God Delusion’ by Richard Dawkins, who, by the way, has the rosiest cheeks I’ve ever seen on a middle aged man.  I’ve also picked up what is supposed to be a response book to all the popular atheist books coming out, ‘The Case for God’ by Karen Armstrong.  I’m curious to see what is in the “mainstream” of religious dialogue these days.   I may “preview” review it tomorrow because they’re both 350 pages+ long.   I’m not enjoying either so far, so wish me luck!

Laughter Yoga at Irving K.

I was going to write yet another review of the Student Leadership Conference (and may still do) but,  just to get this blog revitalized…

Laughter Yoga:  Mixed Emotions

The fourth floor commons at Irving K. was packed with students (On a Saturday!) to take part in one of the SLC’s lunch activities.   Who hasn’t heard of the apparent therapy of laughter yoga?  I was slightly skeptical joining in, but I thought it would be interesting,  laughing with random strangers.  It basically consisted of a few breathing exercises, lots of fake laughter probably meant to lead to real laughter, and strange activities that would try to get us laughing.  Honestly, I had more fun trying to get others laugh than truly laughing myself.  I actually felt about half way through that I had run out of laughter in the laughter tank, and there was no point continuing.  The only thing that kept me continuing this strenuous work-out was thinking about funny memories.  Perhaps the fact that I had run out of laughter means I should be taking more laughter yoga.   But somehow I think that one experience was enough for me – being in a room with people who all wanted to laugh felt good, but it wasn’t all that magical either.

On another note, I’ve had a pretty good start to my second semester.  I still love Arts One, French 123 is full of brilliant students, I’ve been waiting for Poli Sci 100 all year, and I’ve packed my schedule with extra-curriculars.  I have also noticed that I have become entrenched in following UBC affairs…yes, I actually do read Stephen Toope’s emails, the Ubyssey has (somewhat reluctantly) become my staple newspaper, and I think I might go to a Thunderbird game eventually.   Good times.