Category Archives: Politics

Students of UBC: I’m probably just as busy as you, and I’m voting in the AMS Elections. Also, shit-giving.

I managed to inform myself enough to vote, even though I was half-writing my paper while watching a candidate’s debate, was listening to an educational podcast while reading candidates’ bios, and was doing Biology readings in MASS when I was offered an autographed campaign material (lol wtf, seriously?).  And you’ve got til Friday at 5pm to inform yourself in all sorts of idiosyncratic ways too.  And I’m really not going to go beyond that in trying to convince you to vote because it’s your decision if you choose  to screw up our student society  participate.  But remember.  Non-participation is a form of participation, OH SNAP.

Although most candidates are very qualified this year, and quite frankly difficult to distinguish from one another, there are certain candidates I wish to show support (namely, and I do not know these people personally, Carven Li, Justin Yang and, my goodness, I cannot decide between Matt Parson and Alyssa Koehn) and certain candidates I do not want representing students (namely Erik MacKinnon; I cannot believe people have failed to give him shit for his sexist and revealingly immature blog, and go on endorsing him anyway, particularly when all of the other BoG candidates are wonderfully qualified.  So, there.  SHIT GIVEN. )   Also, there are really strange referendum questions.

So, read up:

Official Candidate Bios:
http://www.ams.ubc.ca/governance/ams-elections/candidates/

Ubyssey elections coverage:
http://ubyssey.ca/news/our-2012-ams-elections-special/

UBC Insiders elections coverage:
http://ubcinsiders.ca/category/elections/

AMS Confidential:
http://blogs.ubc.ca/amsconfidential/

And vote:

Polls close 5:00PM , Friday, January 27th.  

https://ams.simplyvoting.com/

Justice for Rumana Monzur

[Originally written for the World Bank Youthink! blog, visible here. I speak only for myself.]

The Silent Global Epidemic: Domestic Violence Against Women

A glance at the world’s news headlines will tell you all about today’s military wars, terrorist attacks, and territorial disputes. But there is an oft forgotten war occurring everywhere in the world and at all times; the war in our homes.

To paraphrase a worker at Vancouver’s Rape Relief & Women’s Shelter: no country in the world, developed or developing, is exempt from the otherwise ordinary men who beat their wives or lovers. I recently attended a discussion panel consisting of professors and women’s activists at my university addressing this very issue.

The panel was set up in response to a case of domestic violence against one of our international graduate students, Rumana Monzur. In a visit back to her home in Bangladesh, her husband brutally attacked her in front of her daughter; she was left hospitalized and hurt in many heartbreaking ways. Rumana Monzur, by publicly seeking justice, has garnered much international media attention for the unheard victims of domestic violence.

The panel was quick to dispel any myths that domestic violence is contained to developing countries like Bangladesh. In my own country of Canada, where we pride ourselves in gender equality, violence and sexual violence against women is prevalent and largely goes unreported.

The problem is of course exacerbated in many developing nations.

There is a common notion that lack of economic development causes domestic violence, as insinuated on one of the World Bank’s own webpages: “An increase in poverty, unemployment, stress, and frustration among men leads to a rise in marital disagreements and domestic violence.”

While this is likely true, the panel decided it was wrong to view economic development issues as causes of domestic violence. Domestic violence is a reflection of attitudes engrained in all cultural systems of the world that view women as lesser human beings. This is why rich men, and men in developed countries, still beat their wives and lovers. Therefore, developmental efforts to reduce domestic violence should not focus on alleviating men’s frustrations, but on empowering women.

Rumana Monzur came to Canada to advance her education, and her right to education was challenged by her husband through violence. The global epidemic of domestic violence will not end until societies proactively support women in their life endeavours.

Edit (Jul 13, 2011): Please see Lilliene’s point in her comment below as well!

World Bank ABCDE Conference in Paris

So I’ve upgraded from the Blogsquad. Check out my first impressions blog from the conference at the website here: BLOG.

UBC residents have a unique opportunity: Provincial By-Election

I’ve been so caught up in the Federal elections, that I hadn’t even noticed that there’s a fairly important Provincial by-election in our Vancouver-Point-Grey riding, May 11th.  The newly elected leader of the BC Liberal Party, Christy Clark, is vying a seat in BC’s legislature.  She’s heading off against the BC NDP’s David Eby, an adjunct professor at UBC Law School.

Jason Payne-Png, The Province.

I don’t know what the rules are on students who are leaving residence before May*, but I know I’ll be attempting to vote anyway.  I live here 8 months of the year, which is 8 months more than Christy Clark.

While I’ve just started researching, I’m pretty sure I’ll vote for Eby.  It’s true that Christy Clark is heaps better than Gordon Campbell (what with finally increasing minimum wage, and not being pushy about the HST), but wouldn’t it be a great insult to the Liberal party & all they have/have not done these past 10 years by denying her the seat?  Besides, David Eby is pretty awesome.  And that’s not just because he seems like a crappy politician (he’s so…genuine), participated in UBC’s vote mob the other week, had a stint with the BC Civil Liberties Association, and sings Bon Jovi unashamedly in public.  No, no, if we were impressed by musical talent, we’d be voting for Stephen Harper’s Conservatives in the Federal elections, but of course we’re not! The real reason is that BC NDP policy is a much needed change to a decade of BC Liberal reign, and Eby is an outstanding candidate with some fresh new ideas.  (Not that I agree with all of them.)

In any case, take part in this historical by-election!  Well, I guess all things are technically historical, including this blogpost…but you know what I mean.

P.S. I know there are more candidates (Danielle Alie, William Gibbens, Eddie Petrossian, and Francoise Raunet), but these are the frontrunners.

*Edit:

I just called the district electoral officer.  I can vote!  Here’s how:


By-election website.
I’ve compiled information from the website here:

ELIGIBILITY

In order to vote in an election for an electoral district, an individual must:

  1. be a Canadian citizen;
  2. be 18 years of age or older on General Voting Day for the election;
  3. be a resident of the electoral district; (The district electoral officer told me that: Students, who have have been residents of the riding 6 months up to the election, are allowed to vote.  Even if you’re not coming back in September. I figure the one week between leaving residence and the election is good game…However, here’s his number if you want to double check before you bus out: 604-660-1446. )
  4. have been a resident of British Columbia for at least 6 months immediately before General Voting Day for the election
  5. be registered as a voter for the electoral district or register as such in conjunction with voting (just do it at the voting station); and
  6. not be disqualified by the Election Act or any other enactment from voting in the election or be otherwise disqualified by law

HOW TO VOTE

WHAT TO BRING?

Voters must provide:

  • one document issued by the Government of B.C. or Canada that contains the voter’s name, photograph and residential address, such as a B.C. driver’s licence or B.C. Identification Card (BCID)

OR

  • a Certificate of Indian Status

OR

  • two documents that contain the voter’s name. At least one of the documents must also contain the voter’s residential address.

More information on what types of documents are accepted here.

WHEN/WHERE?

1) General voting:

Voting places will be open from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m., Wednesday, May 11, 2011.

  1. Bayview Community School, 2251 Collingwood St, Vancouver, B.C.
  2. General Gordon Elementary School, 2896  6 Ave W, Vancouver, B.C.
  3. Kitsilano Community Centre, 2690 Larch St, Vancouver, B.C.
  4. Kitsilano Neighbourhood House, 2325  7 Ave W, Vancouver, B.C.
  5. Kitsilano Secondary School, 2550  10 Ave W, Vancouver, B.C.
  6. Lord Byng Secondary School, 3939  16 Ave W, Vancouver, B.C.
  7. Old Barn Community Centre, 6308 Thunderbird Blvd, Vancouver, B.C.
  8. Point Grey Community Church, 3512  7 Ave, Vancouver, B.C.
  9. Queen Mary Elementary School, 2000 Trimble St, Vancouver, B.C.
  10. St. Augustine’s Church, 2028  7 Ave W, Vancouver, B.C.
  11. St. James Community Square, 3214  10 Ave W, Vancouver, B.C.
  12. St. Marks Anglican Church, 1805 Larch St, Vancouver, B.C.
  13. Steeves Manor, 1985 Wallace St, Vancouver, B.C.
  14. Student Union Building, 6138 Student Union Mall, Vancouver, B.C. (Yay!)
  15. University Hill Elementary School, 5395 Chancellor Blvd, Vancouver, B.C.
  16. University Hill Secondary School, 2896 Acadia Rd, Vancouver, B.C.
  17. West Point Grey United Church, 4595  8 Ave W, Vancouver, B.C.

2) Advance voting

Advance voting will be held from Wednesday, May 4 to Saturday, May 7 from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m.

  1. Jericho Hill Centre, 4180  4 Ave W, Vancouver, B.C.
  2. Kitsilano Community Centre, 2690 Larch St, Vancouver, B.C.
  3. St. Anselm’s Anglican Church, 5210 University Blvd, Vancouver, B.C.

3) Any-day-voting

You can vote at the Vancouver-Point Grey district electoral office during office hours until 4 p.m. on May 11, 2011.

District electoral office:
Hours of Operation: Monday to Friday – 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Saturdays – 10 a.m. to 4 p.m

215 – 2678 West Broadway
(entrance on Stephens Street)
Vancouver BC V6K 2G3

3) Vote by Mail

To request a voting package, click here.

Canada Needs Electoral Reform

I’m too busy to blog right now, but I had to share this!  Why we need electoral reform, simplified.  I will definitely be bringing this issue up to my riding’s candidates.  The Greens and the NDP are the only ones I know of who officially endorse electoral reform.

(Anyone know who I should credit?)

UBC YOUTH VOTE MOB

That’s right, we’re hosting one these.
You know what UBC’s YouTube video streak is like right now.
You’ll want to be there.
http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=117463898334533

Who are you voting for? ME or WE?

When you’re standing in that voting booth, pencil to ballot, who are you thinking of voting for? No, I don’t mean for (as in which party), I mean for (as in to benefit whom?) Are you voting for yourself? Maybe your close friends and family? Perhaps you’re a student and you vote Liberal because of  the student education plan.   Perhaps you vote Conservatives because you haven’t personally been affected these last five years.   Perhaps you didn’t even show up to the voting booth at all because what does it matter to you?



I’ve always been against the idea that you vote for your own interests. When I vote, I will be voting for Canada’s interests. Yes, I realize there is subjectivity in regards to what constitutes Canada’s interests because what you believe is Canada’s interests relies heavily upon your political ideology.   But the distinguishing factor is that I’m voting for my fellow Canadians, and not necessarily for myself.  I’m voting for seniors, I’m voting for First Nations, I’m voting for people who aren’t necessarily me.

Why does this matter? Voting for your interests is supposed to be fair.  I mean, if everyone votes for their own interests, everyone gets a voice.  All interests will be taken into consideration.

I would argue that there is a difference.

Jurgen Habermas says the self-interest model of democracy is characterized by self-interests competing in a marketplace-like forum, and whatever comes out on top, is the processed result. Somethin’ like this:

It’s individualistic, everyone has an equal opportunity, and it works through competition.

He contrasts this with a communitarian model of democracy that is characterized by ethical discussion and consensus with others (i.e. taking others into consideration):

The processed result is more than just winners.  It’s also more than just the mere sum of interests. It’s kind of crazy and difficult to explain so I won’t go into details.

I will say that this sort of discussion model is adored by those who claim humans to be political creatures: those who believe the practice of political discussion is fundamental to humanity.  Like Aristotle.

There are some people, however, who have ruined this idea for me.

*I can’t spell Isaiah, apparently

Plus it’s totally not viable, and people have other concerns like how to pay the monthly bills, so we’ll discard it as a model for now.

But I think we can learn something from the second model. I think we could use a little more consideration of others in our voting process, and we could use a process that isn’t all about competition, but is about compromise and co-operation. I know there is a difference between voting for self-interest, and voting for Canada, because my vote would be different had I decided to vote on my interests.  I also know we would have a lot less Conservative voters, hahaha.

The End.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

PLATFORMS
I may or may not provide commentary on the following platforms, if I find time during exam season!
PDFs here:

Conservatives
Liberals
NDP
Bloc (in English!)
Greens

I’m not going to shut about the election, so get used to it

I was ticked off after watching Conservative TV ads so I decided to make my own ridiculous ad–all in jest of course. ;)

I also wanted to share my friend’s (Stella Yu) doodle of a true story:
Sign Post Wars.

41st Canadian Election: My wishes for a clean, dignified campaign season (and how they probably won’t come true)

I don’t want to be that nostalgic old fogey who reminisces, “politicians weren’t so bad in my day,” not least because I’m only 19.

But I must.

A democracy cannot thrive without open discussion and debate.
Left, right, and centre, I fear our political leaders are not eager to have real discussions, but eager to stifle it.  It’s a vicious circle, because the more they feel other leaders stifle it, the more they feel they must too.  Likes Hobbes said, the moral man, in an environment of moral anarchy, is the foolish man. So can I really blame them?

Last campaign was like a night I just want to forget.   From attack ads with puffins pooping on party leaders, to intentionally misinterpreted soundbites, to plain old lies regarding other party platforms, these petty smear campaigns undermined any real discussion of party policy.

But you know what’s the worst?  You know what really grinds my gears?
They don’t even believe any of it.

For example, the Conservatives, apparently not realizing that the last election campaign ended three years ago, have been continually smearing Michael Ignatieff’s character.  Now, if the Conservatives really doubted Ignatieff’s loyalty to Canada, OK, cool story bro.  What is extremely frustrating for me is that they’re not even being honest with themselves.  I can guarantee you that no Conservative MP actually believes Ignatieff doesn’t care about Canada.  (Except for Rob Anders, but he also believes Nelson Mandela is a terrorist.) And yet, they won’t stop because it’s all about diverting the public’s attention away from real debate of their policies.

Because of the Hobbes situation, I don’t think we can just naively ask our party leaders to “get clean.”  How can they, when the kids down the block are sneaking smokes right in front of them?  There will be a craving.

It might be too late for this election season, but we really need some legislation to keep election campaigns clean.  It’s not just about aesthetics, it’s integral to a healthy democracy.

And to to kick things off, the Greens are proposing to change the channel on attack ads.

P.S. I feel like this post has been riddled with really weird metaphors…

Bill C-393

I’m in the middle of an essay crunch week, but I had time to send a very quick e-mail to our Conservative senators.  Consider doing it too, here.
More info on the bill here.

Dear Members of the Senate,
I have never contacted a senator before.  I am surprised that I must, but the nature of Canadian parliamentary democracy seems to be shifting these days so that I have more than one chamber to deal with.  I do not believe it is the Senate’s job to be turning down a reasonable bill from my house of elected representatives, but with all due respect, I must contact you anyway.
I am writing you concerning Bill C-393.  I am asking you and your colleagues to pass this crucial humanitarian legislation, and soon.  As you know, elections in the other chamber are imminent and I worry that this private member’s bill will not make its way through if you do not vote for it immediately.
Please do not let us down.
Sincerely,
Miriam Sabzevari
[address]
If you want to e-mail them personally (with a potential for response), these are most most of the Conservative senators’ emails:
andrer@sen.parl.gc.ca, anguswd@sen.parl.gc.ca, boisvp@sen.parl.gc.ca, braled@sen.parl.gc.ca, brazep@sen.parl.gc.ca, brownb@sen.parl.gc.ca, carigc@sen.parl.gc.ca, cochre@sen.parl.gc.ca, comeag@sen.parl.gc.ca, tessil@sen.parl.gc.ca, dininc@sen.parl.gc.ca, johnse@sen.parl.gc.ca, mikeduffy@sen.parl.gc.ca, eatonn@sen.parl.gc.ca, finled@sen.parl.gc.ca, fortis@sen.parl.gc.ca, greens@sen.parl.gc.ca, johnsj@sen.parl.gc.ca,
lacomd@sen.parl.gc.ca
, , fruml@sen.parl.gc.ca, kochhv@sen.parl.gc.ca, langd@sen.parl.gc.ca, lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca, mannif@sen.parl.gc.ca, marshe@sen.parl.gc.ca, martin@sen.parl.gc.ca, meighen@sen.parl.gc.ca, mocklp@sen.parl.gc.ca, murral@sen.parl.gc.ca, mcgeed@sen.parl.gc.ca,
neufer@sen.parl.gc.ca
, nolinp@sen.parl.gc.ca, ogilvk@sen.parl.gc.ca, olived@sen.parl.gc.ca, patted@sen.parl.gc.ca, plettd@sen.parl.gc.ca, poirir@sen.parl.gc.ca, rainen@sen.parl.gc.ca, rivarm@sen.parl.gc.ca, runcib@sen.parl.gc.ca, kfl@sen.parl.gc.ca, seidmj@sen.parl.gc.ca, stgerg@sen.parl.gc.ca, stewac@sen.parl.gc.ca,
stratt@sen.parl.gc.ca
, tkachd@sen.parl.gc.ca,
wallaj@sen.parl.gc.ca
, wallinp@sen.parl.gc.ca

More contact info here.

—–

Response rate so far: 1/48

The Hon. Lowell Murray says he supports the bill and asked it to be fast-tracked.  He considers the actions of the Conservative government regarding this bill “unconscionable and disgraceful.”