Category Archives: Spirituality

The Case for GOD Review/Critique

The Case for GOD
Karen Armstrong

Review/Critique by the Noob

The title of this book is ironic; one of Armstrong’s main arguments is that you can’t argue for or against God.   No, this is not some agnostic stating of the obvious, but rather a response to the types of book Richard Dawkins & Co.  are putting out.   Armstrong argues that Dawkins and Co. are a reflection of the modern-day, personalized, intelligent designer, miracle-inducing, creator God.  Armstrong believes this conceptualization of God and religion (particularly the modern idea that religion is about belief, not action) is narrow-minded and do not represent the variety of ways in which we have thought of God through out history.  She recounts the basics from poets, philosophers, and theologians of all backgrounds and times (though I found she was heavy on Christian theology and lacked on the Eastern/Buddhist perspective) and concludes that God was much more transcendent and impossible to know and give labels to than we currently do.

Continue reading

The GOD Delusion by Richard Dawkins: Review/Critique from the Noob

The GOD Delusion
Richard Dawkins

Review/Critique from the Noob

Early on, Dawkins promises to criticise a more sophisticated notion of God, rather than the traditional bearded old man in the sky.  Even so, I find his depiction of God demeaning.  First of all, he states that God is a scientific hypothesis that can be validated or disproved on the basis of evidence.  I highly disagree with this statement.  But—let’s say we let it  go for just a moment.  Then, he uses the Darwinian idea that all complexity comes from baser beginnings via natural selection. If a God exists, it would have to be an end result of evolution rather than as a creator, because, he argues, God is too complex.  But the idea that we can bind God by Darwinian biological standards is laughable, to me at least.  Dawkins attacks a God that is very weak—temporary, bound by biological trends, and a product of linearity.  (I hazard a guess, ignorant as I am, that this Darwinian love affair is probably correlated with all the religious people who deny Darwin.  I wonder if, in response, scientists peer through the limits of a Darwinian and often atheist perspective at everything…)

Much of the book is filled up with similar black and white theories: that deists are so far removed from theists, and Hindus so far removed from Muslims that the “incompatibility” is apparently evidence for the non-existence of God; and that science and God conflict.  For the latter, he always skims over it as if it is entirely implausible.

For example, explaining life on earth: “What the religious mind then fails to grasp is that two candidate solutions are offered to the problem.  God is one.  The anthropic principle is the other.  They are alternatives.”  (136)  Considering the anthropic principle is explained as the presence of six physical factors, I do wonder why they must conflict.  But he does not explain further.  As he often does in the book, he refers to future or previous chapters for his reasoning—reasoning that can be true but never quite hits the nail on the head, or never deals with intelligent opposition…(for this particular example, he claims that a God who could get all six factors in place would be highly improbable.  And we apparently agreed to apply probability theory to God when we decided that a teapot god is improbable.  Forgive me, honestly, if I can’t extrapolate from a teapot deity to a deity that by its very definition is greater than great.)

The second half of the book, however, is more commendable—he has a few decent points that should be at LEAST debated in a secular society like ours.  For example, the idea that religion should not be protected from any criticism simply because it is a religion makes sense in secularism.  He criticizes the idea of children inheriting religious beliefs from their parents, like four year old Jews and Muslims.  The final point of criticism that I found definitely needs to be addressed by theists is his “gaps” theory, that essentially shows how ignorance is often accepted because it leaves everything to the mysteries God. I actually believe that science creates an image of a stronger God, but the gaps theory is still one of Dawkins’s stronger points.  His criticism of extremism is alive and well also.

Through out the book, Dawkins goes on some interesting tangents in relation to scientific phenomena, and he includes some humour.  For anyone who is familiar with idiotic remarks of some fundamentalist theists on Youtube, the humour can get a bit repetitive.

I wish Dawkins could have written a criticism on religion rather than God, because then I might have recommended it.  This, however, is somewhat of a polemic of generalizations.   It left me unsatisfied.

What I’ve done and what to do

1.  WHAT I’VE BEEN (NOT) DOING THIS SUMMER

I was  in hibernation since my last blog post.
OK, no, but I really wish that bear we saw on our driveway was.  (North Vancouver folks, no need to fear, UBC campus only has raccoons, eagles, squirrels, pigeons, giant birds in the skies that look like cranes, etc.)

I just read Paulina’s blog post and my summer, too, has consisted of only unglamorous things: working for the family, reading, painting, sewing, eternal job hunting, and so forth.  I don’t feel bad about this idleness,  but I don’t feel good about it either.  I’m getting my act together soon though, promise!

2.  WHAT YOU AND I CAN DO NEXT YEAR

Erica and Mel already provided some great info on their  involvement and there’s even more out there!
Check out this great resource sheet– Google the different opportunities listed for you on the second page.  Better yet, I believe this is a brand new involvement website and it has been good to me so far.

3.  WHAT I’M GOING TO DO TOMORROW

I’ve picked up the popular book ‘The God Delusion’ by Richard Dawkins, who, by the way, has the rosiest cheeks I’ve ever seen on a middle aged man.  I’ve also picked up what is supposed to be a response book to all the popular atheist books coming out, ‘The Case for God’ by Karen Armstrong.  I’m curious to see what is in the “mainstream” of religious dialogue these days.   I may “preview” review it tomorrow because they’re both 350 pages+ long.   I’m not enjoying either so far, so wish me luck!

Chillin’

I took a stroll down to Tower Beach to relax today (trail is across the Chan Centre.)  It is really quite gorgeous and so open and free compared with all the people who congregate at Wreck Beach.  As I walked across, a strong smell of marijuana came under my nose from some guy behind a log.  And I really do have to wonder: why?  When I look at that beach, I can see atomic particles bouncing around in spacetime, every single one, jampacked into the crashing waves and blue sky, with an intense force infinitely more powerful than the gravity pulling down the heavy rocks of the beach to the core of the earth.  Isn’t this high enough?  I really want to know why you’re escaping into the recesses of your own mind, when the whole universe is a mind, and it’s so high by itself?

But anyway.  I pretty much finished my essay on a Saturday.  12/12 Arts One essays completed.  It feels good.

Avatar: Thoughts

I occasionally venture to the theatres when anticipating one of the great films of my lifetime.  I’m not providing a review here, just some thoughts, so it

CONTAINS SPOLIERS.  DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT WATCHED IT YET.

lol

I’m going to discuss something further than the typical “Pocahontas” theme here.  Although I think that particular political (and environmental message) is still very pertinent today, it could not be missed.   Instead, I’ll focus on what I was pleased to find added a third dimension to this story.

As Grace put it, Pandora is composed of electrical synapses, every living being forming a complex system similar to the human brain.  And of course, my Arts One critical thinking skills kicked in, and I started questioning the symbolism behind all the action.

As I see it, this film can be interpreted to criticize a sickness, an insanity—and do not consider that word as the medical condition we describe it as today, rather imagine it as an illogical attack on the mind.  I use this word because it is “insanity” that Neytiri tries to rid Jake Sully of.   Each tree cut down was causing mental damage to brain cells.  Otherwise, the mind is formed of complex and beautiful electrical relations.  And of course, I’m going  to the explain the “spirit tree” thing as some sort of weird representation of complete consciousness.   In many eastern philosophies, the mind fully conscious (in other words, the collection of all beings in Pandora all at once) is the pathway to connect with“Ai’Wa” or God.  Grace, when she was dying, could not quite connect with the tree as she was still contaminated with the “insanity.”

[I suppose another way to interpret the "everything is connected" message is as Pantheism.  Ok, so I JUST looked this up and found a Huffington Post article on "panentheism" found in Avatar here, if you're interested, but I'm not.]

So what is my view of the “insanity”?  Think of how heavy on technology and science the human side is.  They had avatars for goodness sake, and the presence of science was emphasized many times through the film –you see it in the obvious contrast between Jake Sully and the other avatars, Grace’s words about being a scientist not believing in fairy  tales, and so forth.  However, I would interpret this as an unregulated science—the mission was, after all, in search of unobtanium.  This kind of science is only one of the ways in which, perhaps, the real meaning of “insanity” can be brought about. In general, I’d label the insanity has the egotistical refusal to connect with the spirit tree and other beings.

I think we all also noticed in the story a significant female presence.  The spirit shaman, the god as a “mother,” Neytiri, the pilot woman  and Grace all had important roles to play.  I would have liked to see Pandora more matriarchal, just to see what it would look like—although perhaps the equality there was the result of a female-run society ;)

Overall, I would not name this the best movie ever.  Partially because it is an expensive retelling of Pocahontas, contains too many war scenes (which I zoned out of), and includes a predictable love plot.  I also did not like how Jake ends up becoming one of the Na’vi, I’d rather have seen him return to the human race (or possibly dead, but that’s just me being cruel.)  I would definitely recommend people to see this though.  When you get this harsh with a critique, you know you’re using a double standard, and that it is in fact worthy of many Oscars.

Spiritual Journey, with a little help from Arts One

I always get the strangest stares from people when I tell them I haven’t decided what to believe in.  On the one hand, I understand them because I am not telling them the full truth-in fact, I follow a particular religion’s lifestyle and beliefs.  On the other hand, I wonder why it should be so strange to be on a journey.  Do they just arbitrarily believe what they do based on the tradition of their parents?  Maybe accepted it when they were thirteen?  I would re-evaluate any decision I made when I was thirteen, let alone something spiritual…

“♪ The farther one travels, the less one knows ♫” – George Harrison quoting Lao Tzu
Listen to this song as you read the rest of my blog post:

YouTube Preview Image

Actually, this song is quite contrary to the nature of my Arts One “spiritual journey”.  I haven’t looked within at all; this is, metaphorically speaking, a scientific exploration for the truth external.  The song just reminded me about the two dimensions to spiritual journey- here’s the other:

I just realized I haven’t been thinking about my university degree practically any more. I really don’t care at this moment if I take Political Science, Philosophy, etc.  Instead of preparing and moulding myself into something ready to be plucked as an employee for such and such place, I tend to be developing myself into a wise individual, a wanderer in the desert of timeless, probably unanswerable, questions of metaphysics and morality.

The journey that Arts One has had a large role in forming.  From Descartes’s ‘Je pense, donc je suis,” to Rousseau and Hobbes’s differing views on the nature of man – even to Sartre’s complete replacement of existence over any such essence- I’ve been exposed to so many new ideas in more depth then I ever could have gotten on my own.  But what is most impressive is to think that it’s only a tiny fraction of all the philosophy out in this world of ours!  Sometimes I feel like devouring all the thoughts we’ve thought, and sometimes I feel like Doctor Faustus in the sense that I’d rather abandon these ideas, only, to sit and stop travelling.  “Arrive without travelling, see all without looking,” as George Harrison put it in ‘Inner Light.’

There’s a glimpse of what’s been really going on since September.  I’ll leave you with two quotes that probably explain my craving.

-  “There is an inherent nature of God that God has given human beings, and that nature has been imprinted in us, and one of these things about this nature…is that there is a gnawing pain in the soul, and it does not go away, and one of the tragic aspects of human existence is that, when we remove God from our search…and whatever we call god, if the Buhddists  talk about Ultimate Reality- Ultimate Concern, this is still …approximating our understanding of God- God is Ultimate Concern…if we remove Ultimate Concern from our lives, we have to find substitutes.  This is human nature- we will find subsistutes to fill that hollow space within man, because man is, essentially, a hollow being.”

- “By nature, man is a worshipper”

(Both quotes are in this youtube video, I can’t read the names too well.)