Dear UBC, stop spamming me

Dear UBC,

I don’t know who I’m supposed to be sending this to, as your broadcast e-mail website doesn’t have a contact, and I’m not about to go navigating the millions of departments at UBC to find the right office.  That’s probably your intent.

Stop sending me broadcast e-mails.  I didn’t sign up for weekly e-mails.  JUST STOP.  NO ONE READS THEM.  You want to get to know the Spam folder a bit better?  Because it’s about to happen.

When you send B.S. e-mails (and duplicates of them!), I’m not going to pay attention to the emergency ones.

It’s a trivial problem, yes, but lack of internet etiquette in this day and age is unacceptable from an organization like you. Take an e-mail etiquette workshop, sheesh!

Sincerely,

Miriam

oh socrates…

I recently read the end of the Phaedo, where Socrates is condemned by the Athenian democracy to drink the hemlock and die for “corrupting the youth” and other such charges.  For several weeks now, I’ve been reading Socrates through Plato, and Plato’s admiration for his teacher has really passed down to me.  When Phaedo and the other students broke down crying, I admit I wept too.  I’ve grown really attached to him—even if his irony is little more than sarcasm, even if his logic might not make the most sense, even if half his arguments seem like wordplay…he had meaningful and relevant points on happiness, virtue, knowledge, and the way to live one’s life.  Above all, his life exemplified these points.  What a human being.

I could leave you with countless instances of Socratic wisdom but this is what I’m working right now on my paper (and if you’ve read some of my old blogposts in Spirituality,  you’ll know I think it’s pretty cool):

“…Anyone who does not believe in them [Ancient Greek mythical creatures], who wants to explain them away and make them plausible by means of some sort of rough ingenuity, will need a great deal of time.  But I have no time for such things; and the reason, my friend, is this.  I am still unable, as the Delphic inscription orders, to know myself; and it really seems to me ridiculous to look into other things before I have understood that.  This is why I do not concern myself with them.  I accept what is generally believed, and, as I was just saying, I look not into them but into my own self…” (Plato; Phaedrus, 229e)

Also, video fun.
YouTube Preview Image

In other news,

–This week (and a bit)’s countdown:  3 final/term papers.  1 in-class presentation.  1 interview.  3 intern applications.  10 work study hours.
–I’m not a TV person, but I’ve started watching Community so if I  start talking about “Abed,” run.  Just run.
– I’m tired of blogging about me and what I do (not that I ever wrote much about what I do…).  I’m going to leave that to my diary and direct my blog more towards other things, like random odes to Socrates.
–This is my 101st post!

 

Last Night’s Paper Writing Adventure

The following is a minute-by-minute account of my paper writing adventure last night.  Let me be clear; I am usually much less asinine than this (I think)—it just so happens that, once or twice a term, I have a particularly grueling and uninteresting paper to write. Yes, it happens, even when you’re studying your ideal major.  This blogpost is not indicative of my usual work study habits.

Note: I didn’t think of doing a live minute-by-minute account until later in the night, so you’ll first have to read these first few paragraphs that I’m writing after the fact.

It’s around 8:15pm.  By word count, you’d say I’m halfway done the paper.  By reality, I’m ¼ done.  I’m writing about a narrow topic in metaphysics–in fact, I’m writing a critical assessment of a subargument made by a philosopher in a longer work.  It bores me, I have a nagging suspicion that I don’t completely understand the material, and I can’t come up with anything particularly creative.

So far, my work has been interspersed with logging onto Facebook, Twitter, and Gmail.  I’m starting to lose concentration, so what’s the natural thing to do? Call up my sister and cook us up a batch of Bran Krispies.  This activity is beneficial for two reasons: one, I take my mind off the activity for a while, two, I create a cheaper and (somewhat) healthier version of late night snacks than I could get at Magda’s.

Through out the day, I notice I have been  repeating several phrases to myself aloud, whenever I open a new browser to watch a YouTube video, or reply to a message online: “I really need to do this,” “I really have got to get this done,” “I will,” “I think I will,” “Don’t worry, it’s OK.”

I return to my computer.  ”Look,” I tell myself, “I just need to close my internet browsers and I won’t get distracted.”  This means no YouTube songs on.  I’m stuck with the few songs I have on my computer; repeating Buble, Beatles, Mozart, Beethoven, and this random podcast that keeps on showing up on the Shuffle.

I can’t bring myself to disconnect from the internet completely so I open up an MSN conversation with a friend, who is also supposed to be writing an essay.

I pick up a cracker and it’s just so dry, it makes me sad.

At this point, I decide to make a pact with her; I will write, occasionally chat with her, then write more.

My productivity increases significantly.

The following are real, live, reports from the scene:

~11: 30 SOMEBODY EMAIL MEEEE.  I get instant desktop notifications for those.

~11:40 I’ve watched ½ of The Notebook and somehow have no real motivation to finish this up to watch the rest.

11:42 Progress on essay—OK, I have a thesis now.  I’m like, 1000 words in.  You know you’re doing this wrong when.

11:57 Just put together a tortilla-chicken sandwich.  I’m so proud of my chicken-cooking skill.  I’m eating it at the computer.

12:07 NEW EMAIL!! OH.  Boring newsletter.

12:09 It has suddenly dawned upon me that I probably won’t be completely finished until at least 2am.  Sad face.

12:10 MOZART JUST DOESNT CUT IT FOR ESSAY MUSIC.

12:16 i hate when i accidentally click on the internet button rather than the mword button.  I swear, it’s accidental.  This time i closed it before coming up with something to type into google.  So proud.

12:22 that moment where you come up from the depths of your essay, glance at the clock, and realize you forgot anything existed at all in the world except the essay’s content for 5 whole minutes.  Take a deep breath and dive below the surface, again.

I could get 80+.  I really could.  It doesn’t matter that there isn’t much content here.  Maybe there is.  No, I can’t afford 70s.  No no no no no.

12:26
WHY AM I STILL LISTENIGN TO MOZART?

12:28
this essay is as boring as the font, Times New Roman.

12:33
Productivity increases as time runs out.  Or maybe it’s not a perfect curve.  Note: Graph tonight’s performance.

 

1:19 ……..Why isn’t this over yet?  I think I may get a 67%. Or a 63% or something equally hideous.

Can I just say I’m super happy that nothing terrible is happening?  Like, what if my computer just died right now.  Sure I’ve been emailing things to myself but life would be so much harder.

1:35
one last push over tough paragraphs

NEW EMAIL!!!  Too short, no respite.  Ts;nr.

This is my current music:

YouTube Preview Image

1:38 UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH. JUST FINISH IT.

I have never written anything so poor.

1:56 im seriously contemplating watching the remaining hour of The Notebook, just as a breather.  And because I’m worried I won’t get to it.  I have several tough paragraphs to go.

2:05 I’m lying down on my side (on bed).

2:10 I’m watching The Notebook until 3.  I will then wake up at 7:30, proceed to finish writing, take a nap, and then run out the door to class.  Good night!


[Original meme: http://feministryangosling.tumblr.com/]

8:13   OK now it’s a 70%….

8:47 I can see this get an 80%….I may be delusional at this point, but who knows?

9:14 DONE.  time for nap before class!

More awesome conferences

I had a lovely day at TEDx Terry Talks and Andrew Coyne’s Vancouver Institute lecture (blogpost possibly forthcoming if I find time/anyone cares).  Here are some more awesome events happening this month to distract you from your homework. I can’t go to them all but they look great.  Add any more.

Media Democracy Days Vancouver
featuring David Beers, Elizabeth May, Judy Rebick, and more.
http://mediademocracyday.org/

“Why Don’t More Good People Enter Politics?”
featuring Paul Martin, Mike Harcourt,Ian Hanomansing, and more.
http://www.democracy.arts.ubc.ca/2011/10/31/goodpeoplepolitics/

Terry Global Speaker Series: Bill McKibben
http://www.terry.ubc.ca/2011/10/25/the-terry-global-speakers-series-presents-bill-mckibben/

Honours Philosophy + comic

A few people have asked me what the application process is like and whether it’s worth it.  Hence, the coming-to-existence of this blogpost.  There will be a prize in the form of comic at the end for you.

The Process

I’ll be frank.  I don’t think I went through the process in its due form.  So…this section is kind of sketchy, but it’s better than nothing.

1.  Look up the requirements on the Philosophy website.  Complete them to the best of your abilities.

http://www.philosophy.ubc.ca/undergrad/honours.html

When I applied:
I had NOT completed all my Faculty of Arts requirements.
and
I had NOT applied by the end of my second year; I technically applied in mid-May.  Which may have been too late had the spots in the tutorial been filled up.  Now, I hadn’t even really thought of applying until quite late but you are obviously thinking about it right now, at this very moment, so you shouldn’t be late.

2.  E-mail the Honours Advisor with an e-mail or letter of intent, explaining why you’re applying.  My guess is that it should be cover letter style.  Attach your recommendation letter from a Philosophy instructor, or let him know the instructor will be delivering it to him.

Honours Advisor
Chris Stephens
cstephen@mail.ubc.ca 
BUCH E356

I did not do this, I just contacted him directly, asking how I should apply.  These are simply the instructions the Office Staff gave me, after-the-fact.

He may or may not meet with you for an informal interview during the process.  It shouldn’t take long for a final response; mine took a day.  Then again, it was summer.

What It’s Like / Should You Take It?  

Honours is typically recommended for those students going on to graduate school.  It will help prepare you for the style and vigour of graduate work and I believe graduate schools may expect some sort of honours standing.  If you’re not considering graduate school, or any other professional school where you might benefit from having had challenging academic experiences, then don’t automatically assume it will be useful.

I initially applied to challenge myself, to develop some academic skills for either law or graduate school, to make me feel better about choosing a Philosophy major over Political Science, and to encounter brilliant students.

The Honours degree consists of taking a lot of requirements.  So many that you should plan everything out on Degree Navigator beforehand—with a Poli Sci minor and plans to graduate within 4 years, I have no electives.  There is no Honours thesis to write.  The main component of an Honours degree is the required tutorials.  2 courses (PHIL 390, PHIL 490), 6 credits each (weird, eh?), a small number of students (mine’s 10 or 11) split between 3rd and 4th year, 3 hours a week.

The topic is at your professor’s discretion (the professor changes each year).  It will most likely be his/her topic of research/interest.  As such, the course has a narrow focus in a specialized area of philosophy.  This can be a good or bad thing.  As for me, I’m not a huge fan of contemporary philosophy and its minutiae and I’m not particularly interested in the subject I’m studying right now, although it can occasionally peak my interest.

It’s not easy.  And I kind of like that.  You will easily find some GENIUS students there, so it’s all catch-up/listening for me. Marks-wise, I’m doing average. I believe we are being penalized somewhat marks-wise in taking this course (seeing as we would be doing much better in other courses), which I always hate to see in Honours courses because you should never be penalized for challenging yourself! Nonetheless, I’m sticking through with it because I am learning.  And it’s not like I’m doing epistemology, ugh.

And now for the fun part:

I came across this face-palm worthy yet true maxim not too long ago, called Godwin’s Law:

“As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1.”

I couldn’t help but notice something similar.


Note: I stand corrected.  We went over PWs today and no mention whatsoever.  It was kind of refreshing.

Course Update

A flavour of what I’m formally studying right now:

PHIL 340 (Knowledge and Reality II)

This course is primarily Metaphysics, as the prerequisite was primarily Epistemology.  We’re covering topics like the nature of reality, being, and time.  We ask super bold questions like:

Is reality dependent on our minds?
Do unicorns exist in some non-existent way?
Are there really tables?
What the hell is Quine saying?

I’m taking this course because it’s required for a philosophy degree.  The more of it I do, the more I realize that’s the only reason I’m taking it. It’s true, I cannot help but find pockets of fascinating ideas here and there (Berkeley’s mind-dependent reality, anyone? Love it).  But I’ve come to learn I’m an extremely pragmatic person and if I cannot find a use for it, well, I will whine about in on my blog.  What’s worse, the subject matter is so incredibly abstract—half the time we’re conceiving of conceiving some inadequately explained thing possibly “floating around” out of space and time.  Or maybe I just have to admit that this “abstract” feeling I have is the feeling of not fully understanding metaphysics, haha!

PHIL 310 (The Philosophy of Plato)

First off, an aside.  50% of the reason why I even bother to show up to this class is the professor.  He is so fun to watch, whether he’s gesticulating in sweeping arm movements, being ridiculously eloquent, or reciting Ancient Greek epic poetry (um, please do more of that).  Anyhow, I had to take a historical philosophy class for my degree and of course I was also attracted to Plato’s idea in the Republic that that philosophers should rule the world by A. Whitehead’s quote: “The safest general characterization of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Plato.”

No doubt you’re asking: Miriam, now that you have seven whole weeks of Plato class under your belt, is this true!?

I do think it’s true, but we have to acknowledge that a sizeable chunk of those footnotes are responses in disagreement with Plato. Anyhow, it’s a bit of a leisurely class as it is specifically open to non-philosophy majors and there is little reading.  That slices both ways because while it’s relaxing it can occasionally be repetitive.

RUSS 412 (Dostoevsky in Translation)

I need to take a literature class for my Arts degree (see a trend going on here?) and I am lucky enough to have the option to take a course on the writer of my favourite book ever, The Brothers Karamazov.  Dostoesvky was a 19th century Russian writer whose works, in my opinion, still have so much resonance today.  I love his complexity, his portrayal of inner conflict, and his deeply philosophical themes in the most soap-operatic of stories (because really, what can be more realistic than philosophy in the midst of the crowd?)

Lectures are primarily historical, whether background on Russia or Dostoevsky’s life.  Professor gives lots of leeway in topics and interpretations, which again slices both ways as I would like to have have more guidance in interpretation but it’s also nice to have freedom.  I have a presentation due next week, so that should be fun.

PHIL 390 (Honours 3rd Year)

Some people have asked about the application process for Philosophy Honours so I’ll cover that, as well as my review of the course in my next post…whenever that is!

black squirrel

Every single day, this black squirrel  hangs out on the tree next to my window, munching on the nuts or whatever it is that he’s eating.  While I write my paper, he scavenges for food.  We’re best buds.

Today, he took a bold risk and went after the food on the less stable branches really close to my window.  He fell down to a second branch.  A few seconds later, I saw his little squirrel face and his tiny paws scratching madly at my window sill and, a moment later, a devastatingly loud thud.  2 stories.

I don’t think I’ve seen any sentient being die before.  It’s legitimately…painful to watch.  So if I’m so upset about a squirrel death, why is it that I can read news media articles on people dying, over and over again, with little more than a furrowed brow?…And why does chicken taste so damn good?…

OH MY GOSH, I JUST HEARD LEAVES RUSTLE ON THE GROUND.  MAYBE HE’S ALIVE.

No. I think he’s gone.

R.I.P.  black squirrel.

Interuniversity Conference on Education 2011

This is more of a response than a review, so if you didn’t go to this student-driven conference on innovating education on Saturday, it will be like reading a sequel for a novel you’ve never read.  Never fear—I chuck you people towards Tyler’s blog and the website if you’re interested in the concept.

*Chucks*

Now that those people are gone, let’s be frank.  I chucked those people out of here because a) I don’t like summarizing things and b) I’m writing a few thoughts in random point-form.

0 There was something itching at me the whole time…I have a couple prejudices that make the whole concept of innovating education challenging for me:

Privilege Bias: I am priveleged under several aspects of the current system.  I get good grades as it is.  My learning style is suited to typical lecture-style, cut and dry teaching.  So, I might have this selfish prejudice against changing things.

Status Quo Bias : See Tyler’s post.  This is really big, especially in conjunction with the  fact that there are many other problems and broken systems we could be working towards solving.  I suppose it’s implicit when you go to a conference like this that you think it’s important but I always like to ask why.  Why should I/we focus on this topic in particular?  Are we appealing to justice and fairness, equality, truth, functionality/efficiency, or something else—and is it really such a pressing issue? (For example, we might understand why developing skills > information processing but why is it important? Is it because it will somehow make our workforce more efficient, is it because we’re going to stall in terms of being a forward-looking society,  or is it because we simply find inherent value in perfection?  And, given these reasons, how does it compare with other problems?)  I feel like these questions weren’t asked or answered, and understandably so because they’re  party pooper questions.

o I got about 100 pages into a introductory Macro-Economics textbook this summer (for fun) before I became really busy, but those 100 pages were fascinating enough.  There were all these concepts and assumptions within economics that I see as patterns in society today.  One of these is the notion of “specialization.”  I recall the textbook arguing for the benefits of specialization—after all, an economy is more efficient when 3 people specialize in 3 different areas than when 3 people are well-rounded in all 3 areas.  You can see where the university has adopted this and the consequences it entails.  My point is that our institutions are shaped by political, social, economic, and scientific ideas…ideas are malleable and so are our institutions…OK so I thought I would have more to say on this point but apparently not.

o Moving forward: In Dr.Rawn’s talk, we learned about the process of implementing change.  She openly admitted that she made mistakes when starting up her new course.  Mistakes happen along the way.  And I think it’s precisely those mistakes that are most feared—I don’t think it’s lack of leaders who care about better education, I don’t think it’s lack of resources, but the implications of making mistakes in something as life-changing as education.  This, coupled with the problem of the Status Quo, poses quite the challenge.

o The problem with the word “innovating” is that it makes me think of shiny new buildings, toasters, and the future.  When I think of one my most successful learning experiences, Arts One, I would say that it’s more traditional than anything.  It brought us back to the notion of a university as a talking circle, an open conversation, a place to read together and learn together.  We didn’t have twitter in the classroom, we didn’t have group projects, we didn’t do anything new.  Moral of the story: beware of the words we use.

I was going to give a quick review of the different sections in Haiku form, but I am suddenly incredibly stressed out and leave that idea for any other pseudo-poets to pursue!

 

Finding peace of mind in the branches, soil, and leaves

When I read Anne Frank’s diary last summer, I smiled sadly at this passage. It was written just months before she was found and sent to the concentration camps.

“The best remedy for those who are afraid, lonely or unhappy is to go outside, somewhere where they can be quiet, alone with the heavens, nature and God… As long as this exists, and it certainly always will, I know that then there will always be comfort for every sorrow, whatever the circumstances may be. And I firmly believe that nature brings solace in all troubles.”
-Anne Frank, February 23, 1944.

I find emotional solace encountering nature, the organic, the wild. UBC is bountiful in this respect; take a stroll in Nitobe garden, head down to Tower Beach, or visit UBC Farm. Unplug from the noise, from the routine, from the confines of society—go back to where you came from.

[This blogpost was written for the Blog to Thrive Challenge with Thrive UBC.  150 words max.]

3rd year cynicism?

Why should I vote in the Arts Undergraduate Society election?  Or any such election?–residence floors, undergraduate socities, clubs, etc.

Is voting devalued if overused?  These elections can hardly be said to be cultivating a voting culture when so few vote.

For those less cynical, go to your Student Service Centre and click Webvote.