Categories
ETEC 500

Mod 4- Lesson 3 Feb 26, 2013

Action research general thoughts –

I had heard the term “action research” discussed before during my teaching. In fact, we had an administrator who was suggesting/pressuring us to participate in such a venture. However, I new nothing about it and now that I have done some readings – I can see how errant he was to be looking for participants in his venture.

The readings legitimized action research for me as a formal type of study. For some reason, I felt that action research was somewhat less legitimate given the fact that it was school based research and not conducted by an external researcher. Now I can see that it is actually much more applicable and legitimate due to it’s grass-roots nature and the affordances of a school, a teacher or a group of teachers having the ability to conduct their own study and develop action plans for areas of focus that directly concern them.

I can see that I had a slightly “two-tiered” mentality regarding this type of research. As if, because of the context, it is somehow not as genuine? And that is absolutely wrong. If conducted well, it can more then likely produce results that are equally relevant, if not more relevant, then other types of research. Especially when juxtaposed with the thought that it can bring about more immediate changes/influences of the practice of a teacher and the learning for students.

Categories
ETEC 500

Mod 4 – Lesson 2

After completing the readings and ruminating over the ideas I keep circling back to one central theme.

How do you truly design a flawless study of human beings?

If one truly takes into account all of the factors that can influence the validity of an experiment (specifically with educational research) I can’t see how it would be possible to proceed. It makes sense, that you can mitigate the effect of these variables with the type of design that you employ but it seems to be the extrinsic validity that would be the most difficult to eliminate. When a researcher conducts an experiment on a specific segment of the population will those results have any applicability to another segment of the population? And isn’t this the basis for developing sound theory? That the results should be replicable by another researcher? Or maybe the underlying insinuation is that the results can only be reproduced in that specific setting.

This topic – understanding experimental research – truly seems to be a convuluted and expanding practice. It led me to question as well, what does it mean to be peer-reviewed? And what do peer-reviewed look for to determine validity? I have skimmed through some other documents to further my background with the subject and have them below anyone had an interest.

PC

Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research

http://www.uky.edu/~clthyn2/PS671/CS_part1.pdf

Understanding and validity in qualitative research

http://www.msuedtechsandbox.com/hybridphd/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/maxwell92.pdf

Criteria for the peer-review process for publication of experimental and quasi-experimental research

http://www.aepc.es/ijchp/articulos_pdf/ijchp-303.pdf

Spam prevention powered by Akismet