500

Lauman’s (2000) literature review is related to the use of home computers and learning with technology in school. I thought the background section gave the reader a strong sense of the author’s connection to the topic. The author was clear in outlining her objectives in the introduction. There was no mention of how the author selected the articles she reviewed. I think Lauman (2000)) should have used short titles, formatted in an apa headings system, instead of her research questions as headings. I would have preferred to see academic research in place of some of the citations. For example, she quoted something out of an Alberta Learning brochure and someone named “Buck” via personal communication but didn’t give us his/her background. Lauman (2000) outlined the conclusions and some detail like sample size and research focus of various studies she reviewed. However, she neglected to mention the methods used in these studies. More importantly, Lauman (2000) didn’t synthesize or criticize the literature. She could’ve offered explanations for differences between studies. Also, I would’ve liked to see research that refutes that having a home computer is an advantage for students. Lauman (2000) noted what gaps exist in the literature and suggested what future research should take place. I commend her for proposing that the future research could lead to a necessary action plan to make parents aware of the importance of their role as educators because this indicates the purpose and importance of such future research.

Lauman, D. J. (2000). Student home computer use: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Computing Education, 33(2), 196-203.