Growth Opportunities for Ecocalzer

During class the other day we discussed an Arc Initiative case called Ecocalzer.  I feel that this company has a lot of potential to expand into international markets such as Vancouver because its value proposition gives it a competitive advantage over existing shoe companies in the market. Its mission is to produce fashionable, hand made, eco friendly shoes. If Ecocalzer can find an effective and accessible channel to reach its consumer base through, it is almost guaranteed to succeed because it has minimal competition. What I propose that Ecocalzer does is establish a consumer base within its niche market: fashion and environment conscious communities. A good way to reach these consumers is by displaying their shoes at art schools such as Emily Carr and at art markets such as Granville Island or the Harmony Arts Festival.

An incredible opportunity for Ecocalzer to increase its brand awareness is through social media:  if all of the one thousand students in COMM 101 alone “likes” or “shares” its Facebook page, surely word would have spread. An attached video that tells John’s story would make the product even more appealing to consumers as it is creating shared value by redefining productivity (solving an environmental issue).

However, Ecocalzer must be aware that there are many cheaper substitutes for its product, so if it wishes to maximize its profits, it needs to sell at a moderate price where the consumer’s marginal utitility is equal to marginal cost.

I look forward to seeing Ecocalzer expand into the Vancouver market one day!

Help support John by “liking” this page!

Resources: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=180548408805280&set=a.180547658805355.1073741828.180530798807041&type=1&theater 

Is Fair Trade Coffee Better?

Have you ever seen a problem and wondered how you can solve it? Social entrepreneurs have the power to change the way things are done: they see a problem, and develop a business that solves the issue. What better way is there to run a business?

Bridgehead Coffee is the perfect example of the story of an entrepreneur. It was foundedby two United Church ministers and two social activists who were concerned for the prospects of small-scale coffee farmers in Nicaragua.  What Bridgehead offers is coffee made from fair trade coffee beans. The company has a commitment to work with only small scale farmers who provide Bridgehouse with the best quality coffee beans at a price that reflects the hard work that the farmers have put into the harvesting process. They fulfill their part of the agreement by bringing out the best in the raw ingredients of their coffee through practices that minimize the impacts on the environment.

While social entrepreneurs may not be able to minimize their costs like other companies whose only goal is to maximize profits, they gain additional social profit. These entrepreneurs attract an emerging group of consumers who are becoming increasingly conscious about the journey behind the products they buy.

Learn more about the story behind Bridgehead Coffeehouse:

Or Visit their website: http://www.bridgehead.ca, make sure you check out their blogs as well to learn more about what they’re involved with! Bridgehouse is seeing so much success lately that Globe and Mail did an interview with them.

If you have additional interest in the development of social entrepreneurship in Canada, make sure you check out this article too!

Are Lululemon Pants meant for ALL women?

Re: Tiana’s Blog Post Lululemon’s Culture: The Pursuit of Greatness

Lululemon has always been known for the positive culture that exists within the organization; employees, consumers, and investors alike are drawn to the culture that empowers individuals to live a healthy fulfilling life. Just as my classmate, Tiana mentioned in her blog post, “Lululemon’s organizational culture differentiates from the typical business because of its value in encouraging employees’ self development”.

Unfortunately, shortly after her blog post was published, the value proposition of Lululemon seemingly took a drastic change. Founder of Lululemon Chip Wilson stated in a Bloomberg interview:

“quite frankly, some women’s bodies just actually don’t work for it.”– Chip Wilson in response to why pants are pilling

Perhaps his intention behind that statement wasn’t to discriminate oversized women, but interviewer Reagen excessively emphasized this point and the media took full advantage of Wilson’s slip in speech. The company’s brand image wasn’t improved when Wilson stepped up to make a public apology that was filled with hesitations making the apology seem insincere. The founder defines the culture, values, and beliefs of a company, so Wilson’s statement damaged the image of the company immensely. My friend who has been a loyal yoga teacher at Lululemon for the past four years told me that he didn’t wanted to teach at Lululemon anymore because he felt that his values no longer aligned with those of the company.

Original Interview

Wilson’s Apology

 

To see what others think about this situation, check out:

http://www.ctvnews.ca/business/lululemon-founder-says-yoga-pants-don-t-work-with-some-women-s-bodies-1.1532005#ixzz2kVUdiwp1 

Image from: https://blogs.ubc.ca/aliceguo/files/2011/04/lulud.jpg 

The Great Canadian Grocer War

 

The Canadian grocery war is becoming increasingly intense. The three big players of the industry: Loblaws, Sobeys, and Metro are all dropping in revenue significantly. Loblaws saw a decrease in almost 30% of earnings in its 3rd quarter this year, while Metro saw a 9% decrease in sales this year. Although these three giant corporations hold a competitive monopoly in the grocery industry, they are losing out due to the threat of new entrants. Low margin companies such as Walmart and Target are aggressively competing with the traditional grocers. They are able to offer what Loblaws, Metro and Sobe

ys can offer at a cheaper price. Not surprisingly, Amazon is continuing to innovate its business to adapt with the times. They are now offering produce on their website, further threatening the oligopoly that the three grocer giants once held. As these low margin companies continue expanding into the grocery market, the traditional grocers are also expanding into other markets. Loblaws is seeing much success in its Joe Fresh Fashion department. However, if these companies wish to survive, they must continue innovating their brand by creating points of differentiation between themselves and the lower priced companies.

Watch this video for a full analysis of the current situation.

Resources:

http://www.bnn.ca/News/2013/11/13/The-challenges-facing-Canadas-grocers.aspx

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/international-business/us-business/amazon-to-take-on-grocers-as-retail-landscape-gets-more-crowded/article15172182/

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/11/13/metro-results-idUSL4N0IY3T020131113

http://denverbargains.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/walmart-pricematch-produce.jpg

http://fresh.amazon.com

 

 

FREE lipstick for us, FREE consumer information for M.A.C

 

Last week when I was making my purchase at M.A.C cosmetics, the first thing that the sales asked me was what is your last name. She continued on to ask for my first name, my email and my address. Finding it strange that she upright asked me for all my personal information without the slightest explanation as to what it was for, my Sauder sixth sense kicked in and I asked her what this information was for. Her explanation was that they had a rewards program where you receive a free lipstick for every six M.A.C packages you return. I thought to myself: isn’t that a smart way of obtaining consumer statistics to help with marketing while the customer happily thinks that they are simply earning themselves free lipstick.

When I went home, I did some research on M.A.C and I found this very resourceful blog called Viral Marketing that talks about how brands market themselves. In its blog about M.A.C, it outlined all the different strategies that the company used to create brand positioning, brand marketing and product differentiation. After reading this blog, I realized that the “Back to M.A.C” project was actually a marketing tactic that uses our commitment to the environment in returning packages to justify our need to buy more M.A.C products and for them to gain access to our personal information. Beware of greenwashing.

Resources:

http://marketingdope.blogspot.ca/2007/11/mac-cosmetics-story.html

Images from: http://www.maccosmetics.com/giving_back/btm_return_packaging.tmpl

http://irosado.blogspot.ca/2009/09/history-of-mac-cosmetics-inc.html

WE are the Power of Change- The Story of a Social Enterprise

When I was in high school, I was very involved with the Me to We club. At one point we were selling Me to We T-shirts as a fundraiser and I found myself explaining to people that Me to We is a social enterprise where 50% of all their profits go towards their partner charity Free the Children, a charity that seeks to empower youth to make a difference in the world. I explained that their shirts were made in sweat-shop free environments with sustainable resources.  For every shirt sold, one tree would be planted in a developing community. Even though I said all of this, I never truly understood what a social enterprise is until now. Me to We is also a lifestyle, a culture.

WE Day- Inspiring a Generation of Youth

Every year thousands of students in Canada and the United Kingdom are inspired at WE Day to become a part of this culture. Through chants like “We are the Change”, and models of the founders wearing Me to We Style, the culture of Me to We becomes more engrained into the lives of the students. As a social enterprise, Me to We doesn’t measure their success by the profits they make, but by the number of lives they have impacted.

To better understand the story behind Me to We, check out this webiste:

http://www.metowe.com/about-us/our-organization/social-enterprise-an-innovative-new-model/

Image From:

http://schoolsites.granderie.ca/ddss/files/ddss/u40/me_to_we_logo.jpg

Lululemon: The Quality Experience Turned Sheer

“Quality is at the heart of everything we do, from the technical features we (sometimes literally) weave into our products, to the people we work with and relationships we build” (Lululemon website). Lululemon has long been known for the quality yoga products that it sells. Of course quality comes at a price. The average pair of yoga pants at Lululemon costs just over $100. However, customers are willing to pay the extra price to buy these yoga pants from Lululemon even though there are many other companies that sell similar articles of clothing at a lower price. This is because Lululemon has a corporate reputation for the quality of its unique “luon” fabrics. Lululemon has used the differentiation strategy from Porter’s Generic Strategies: offering a product that customers perceive to be better and different from those of other companies.

“Lululemon lawsuit over too-sheer pants gets lead plaintiff”

Lulu’s Dark Days

Now all of a sudden the news headlines read: “Lululemon lawsuit over too-sheer pants gets lead plaintiff”, and their market value takes a dip. This example supports Porter’s theory that a combination of generic strategies doesn’t work. Lululemon tried to cut its cost and sell pants that were not up to quality with the standards and pricing of the company. Immediately, they saw the effects of this poor decision. Fortunately for Lululemon, many of its customers are staying loyal: believing that Lululemon will return to their former standard of quality.

Sources:

http://www.lululemon.com/education/quality

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/lululemon-lawsuit-over-too-sheer-pants-gets-lead-plaintiff/article14642784/

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/inside-the-market/lululemon-shares-on-cusp-of-major-uptrend-analyst/article13060633/

Mickey D’s Deceiving Image as Official Restaurant of the Olympic Games

McDonald’s. The Official Restaurant of the Olympic Games.

Re: Colin Lam’s Blog Post- Why McDonald’s Remains Atop the [Fast] Food Chain 

Reading my classmate, Colin Lam’s blog about how McDonald’s adaptations to the demands of consumers allows it to stay atop the fast food chain made me reflect upon the image which I have of McDonald’s. I have always been internally conflicted with whether McDonald’s is healthy or unhealthy. It is basically common knowledge that McDonald’s does not sell healthy food, and McDonald’s knows that in order for it to be successful it must meet the demands of the increasingly health conscious consumer base. What McDonald’s has done is simply spectacular. By being key partners with leading healthy living associations such as the Olympics, FIFA and NBA, we naturally associate the values of McDonald’s with those of its partners. The Olympics promotes healthy living, competitive sports and the world coming together to celebrate the achievements of their country’s athletes. Ironically, McDonald’s, a company that sells greasy junk food, is its biggest sponsor. During the Olympics, the venues and our television screens are flooded with McDonald’s promotions, causing us to form the deceiving linkage that there is an association between the cholesterol-saturated foods of McDonald’s and the healthy lifestyle that the Olympics promotes. In fact, this is so controversial that critics have debated whether it is ethical to place McDonald’s brand next to the spotlight of the Olympics when the two have obviously opposite values. Critic: McDonald’s unfit for Olympics

Nonetheless, McDonald’s successful brand positioning has deceived its consumers to believe that its food is healthier than it actually is.

Sources:

https://blogs.ubc.ca/colinlam/2013/10/07/why-mcdonalds-remains-atop-the-fast-food-chain/

http://www.canadianbusiness.com/companies-and-industries/mickey-ds-upscale-push/

Image From: http://media.carbonated.tv/72182_story__mcdonalds-olympics.jpg

Cineplex Moving into the Living Room with Netflix

In recent years, online movie streaming has become a huge threat to the movie theatre industry. Cineplex is the largest chain movie company in Canada owning many theatres including Scotiabank, Famous Players, and SilverCity. A close substitute for the movie theatre industry is online movie rentals, so naturally, Netflix, the largest movie rental subscription company in the US, is Cineplex’s major rival.

“The Cineplex Store has all the latest and greatest new releases, plus your favourite catalogue classics.” –cineplex.com

Netflix’s point of parity is providing movie-streaming services to customers in the comfort of their home. The value of Netflix shares has been steadily increasing for the past year; understanding the success of Netflix, Cineplex has followed in their footsteps by strategically placing more emphasis on the online and at home services. From our class readings, we know that in order for a company to be successful, they should find their own niche: a point of difference that sets them apart from other companies. What Cineplex offers that Netflix doesn’t is their ability to rent movies that are newly released to video, and sometimes even movies that haven’t been released on DVD and Blu-ray yet. With the recent launch of Cineplex Digital Tuesdays, we see a real push towards the online movie rental market. Cineplex now offers online rentals of standard definition movies on their online store for only $2.50 on Tuesdays.

Resources:

http://www.fool.ca/2013/10/04/cineplex-taking-a-page-from-netflixs-playbook/

http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/cineplex-brings-tuesday-movie-discount-into-your-living-room-tsx-cgx-1836416.htm

Images:

http://store.cineplex.com/store/featured?Ntt=DT

Walmart Employees Grievances

How much profit is considered enough? Is it ethical for a multi million- dollar company to withhold its employees from full time status in order to avoid giving them the health benefits that come with it? Is it ethical for them to fire employees and prevent them from ever applying again at another branch after they legally protest for improvements in working conditions and better wages? Last Thursday, Walmart illegally fired 20 employees and disciplined another 80 for speaking out for their grievances. For a company that makes approximately $16 billion annually, providing its workers with these benefits that they rightly deserve is a dent in their pocket. In the short term, Walmart may make more money, but in the long run, improving their employee’s salaries and health benefits will give the employees more purchasing power. This will benefit both Walmart and the local economy. Because of their unethical choices, Walmart is the perfect example of “a business whose employees don’t want to be there everyday, who aren’t using a hundred percent of their efforts and energy and their creativity to make the business better”. According to Edward Freeman, “that’s a business in decline”.

Resources: http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2013/09/05/business-walmart-labour.html

Image from : http://www.humanevents.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/wal-mart.jpg