Entrepreneurship – Thinking about it in the perspective of high risk of failing

In class we talked a lot about, entrepreneurship, from two entrepreneurs as guest speakers. Entrepreneurship always has that positive vibe to it, in that if one is successful in it, it can change their lives forever. It is always associated with the popular “million dollar story” of people who started out as the “average man” went on to achieve great milestones, in the end, reaching a high respectable position in society (e.g. Bill Gates, Richard Branson). However, very few focus on the negative aspects of the business (high risk of failing). In fact 75% or more businesses in Canada employ less than 100 people, so, it’s important to open our mind just a little and think realistically about the potential risk that they may face, and how this could seriously impact economy. Another fact that was mentioned in class by the guest speakers, was that there’s a 50/50 chance of a small business in Canada having a life expectancy of 5+ years. So, this adds even more to the fact that there is an importance attached to the need of focusing on the risk of this field rather than just the success stories.

The main problems leading to failure is starting business for the wrong reasons

– Profit is not the passion/driving force
– don’t want to be bossed around
– want free time vs. stamina to stick with it (free time not an option because you got to be on 24/7)
– poor management
– not enough capital
– location
– lack of planning (planning is obviously essential, when undergoing such a venture, especially with the risk attached, so a calculated method is necessary in order to minimize the risk as much as possible)

So, in the case of many entrepreneurial business, it is the issue of finding a unique value proposition. This is usually done by finding a problem first, but not just any problem, but a significant problem, to which the solution can attract a lot attention, demand, and hopefully in the long-run, profit and sustainability of the business.

So, what other entrepreneurial business can do to avoid the risk, or at least minimize it is to:

Find the problem
– do this first before finding the solution
– help to keep things moving forward
– looking at solutions from a problem based proposition

Entrepreneurship is an extremely flexible, ambiguous, and demanding, which is why such businesses probably fail, since they may not know the scope in which this particular field works.

Image

“Sign.” My Confined Space. Web. 23 Nov 2010

Social Entrepreneurship – Difficult, but can be done if you’re the “right person”

In class we had also been talking not just about entrepreneurs, but also a lot about social entrepreneurship. Many are still coming to terms as to what social entrepreneurship is. It has actually existed for a long time, even though people may not call it entrepreneurship (e.g. woman’s movement, civil rights movement etc). A Social Entrepreneur always has a social mission (to be motivated by something, to fix something that is not being met by other forces in the market, whether it be the private sector, the government etc). For a social entrepreneur there exists, constantly, a sense of social purpose. The function itself is an interesting space. The function tries to address the social issue by using market forces but they have their own middle space, so they have a little difficulty in running their businesses. However, there are certain difficulties associated with this.

These difficulties are:

– struggle with the financial side
– difficult to measure the value yielded/impact through social entrepreneurship, others can measure it by looking at profit but social entrepreneurs do not look at profit
– this is because it doesn’t happen now, or next year, it’s a long-term solution

Along with these difficulties, social entrepreneurs such as Mack McCarter (a social entrepreneur who is the founder of Community Renewal International, or CRI, which focuses on connecting ‘at-risk’ communities to resources, health care, and education) are some who definitely face these risks as funding is a big issue and profit (money coming in) is not the most prioritized need.

Along with such difficulties, social entrepreneurs such as Mack McCarter also have certain necessities to operate under this system of “looking for profit”.
Key Needs:

– More volunteers and staff
– New financial services
– More government involvement
– Better business skills

However, given the will and having a high need to make change in society, I believe this should be enough for people like McCarter to overcome these difficulties (by raising voice and hopefully attracting volunteers, some investors, and other necessary support). This is probably the reason why social entrepreneurship isn’t extinct, and is expanding amongst individuals more than ever before, because of the better platform these days, on which people can raise voice and execute effective change in reality.

Image

“Mack McCarter – The guy with the change.” CRI. Web. 25 Nov 2010.

Spam prevention powered by Akismet