For this week’s reading(s), I found the content of Canals’ article intriguing but found his ‘take-away’ message a bit alarming.
The positive aspect I want to address is that exposure to a Latin American religion other than catholicism is always welcome, since popular media does not make it readily available. I appreciate how Canals’ anthropological research was done in a respectful manner, documented how a somewhat ‘invisible’ cultural practice is performed to a presumable Western audience, given that the text was written in English, and some context to how it is significant within Venezuelan society. However, I did find his concluding message conflicting as it suggests disrespecting cultural norms to collect more data.
‘visual mistakes’, as Canals’ refers to wrongly capturing cultural practices to ‘collect valuable data for research’, could be avoided altogether if he asked the right questions with consent from those he wished to collect data from. Moreover, Canals could have used another medium to record his data, such as writing or sketching, as to not invade privacy or interfere with cultural practices. His methodology and encouragement to other visual anthropologists thus highlight some ethical questions that tread the line of humanizing, dehumanizing, and integrity.
As for the actual content within the text, I wondered why the more evolved version of Maria Lionza is a white woman. Maybe it’s racism, maybe it follows the chronological history of Venezuela from pre-conquest to present, but it definitely reinforces some harmful norms that are common in Latin America. Language, either oral, captured through a medium, or behavioural, shapes the way you think and perceive the world so it is interesting how such a mixed population would continue to validate this concept.
Lastly, I do not really understand why the religion of Maria Lionza is called a cult if it is the second most practiced religion in Venezuela, whose population is almost 29 million. At this point, I am no longer critiquing Canals but Western interpretations of African or Indigenous religions in general. The term cult is used to define a social movement rather than a religion at all, which is offensive given that these religions have been performed for centuries or even more than millennia. I do not see why Voodoo, Candomblé, or Maria Lionza should be considered a myth or cult given their cultural significance. Especially if many people practice this religion, I do not see how they are a ‘secret’; maybe given that the West is not in close proximity to the communities that practice these religions and that the values from the religions we are familiar with conflict with those found in Maria Lionza and so forth is the reason we do not take them as seriously.
Therefore, my question to the class is – how did you find Canals’ writing? Methodology?