Categories
Uncategorized

Dove’s fake beauty campaign

Personal perception vs reality of a young woman’s physical appearance

After reading an article from a classmate on Dove’s efforts to empower young women and encouraging natural beauty. A new ad was launched to get women to describe their physical appearance to a forensic artist. As a result, their descriptions of themselves were more critical than a stranger’s perception.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=XpaOjMXyJGk

Although the message is purely good-intentioned, I can’t help but believe that every company’s underlying objectives is to maximize profit and expand its market which devalues Dove’s marketing efforts. When the marketing strategy become more personable, it makes room for more subjectivity which can easily become misconstrued — I thought the message to consumers was forced. This campaign accidentally magnified the idea that beauty is a prevalent focus in society. These women are commenting only on physicality which misses the idea of “real beauty” — which Laura Stampler described as  “intelligence and wit and ethical sensibility” (6).  The reason why  people glance over these flaws is because it’s brand positioning has already led consumers to develop loyalty. It has engraved itself into our minds as that product that boosts self esteems. Their established leadership in this market, as described by Al Ries and Jack Trout, has made it difficult to change the customer’s impression of Dove’s Real Beauty.

Sources:

http://www.quickmba.com/marketing/ries-trout/positioning/

http://www.businessinsider.com/why-people-hate-doves-real-beauty-ad-2013-4

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/eat-the-damn-cake/201304/whats-wrong-doves-real-beauty-sketches-campaign

Categories
Uncategorized

Sauder’s response to controversy with a twist of Milton Friedman

 

Public relations conferencing for Sauder conflict resolution

Milton Friedman’s free enterprise concept of social obligation versus entrepreneurial self interest to address Sauder’s response to the rape chant allegations: Friedman spoke of a concept that businesses should only act within their own interests of gaining profit. Working in favor of social responsibility defeats the purpose of free enterprise. Climate change and poverty shouldn’t be for firms to solve. But is there a way to satisfy both external and internal goals? Looking at the Sauder situation from the eyes of a free enterprise, responding to the media and people accomplished a combination of both. After all, the business school represents a lot of stakeholders who have leverage on our funding and reputation. Having already been plunged into this compromising situation, Sauder was left with two choices — to deny or confirm the allegations. I’d say the goal here was to try to exit the conflict unscathed but the public wanted consequences for our actions. Confirming the accusations seemingly worked against our own interests,  but the other option would’ve only put us under more fire. The latter choice provided the public with closure and a sense of Sauder taking control. It showed our ability to take responsibility and released public leverage on our school’s decisions.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFCo5HkCAo4

Sources:
http://site.ebrary.com/lib/ubc/docDetail.action?docID=10187339&page=171
http://ubyssey.ca/news/sauder-chant-325/

Spam prevention powered by Akismet