Informal post #2 – Place, time, and identity!

We were asked to look at a timeline that laid out the history of the land that UBC sits on and relate it to the history of biology. I looked at the timeline and some of the years really jumped out at me. 1914, for example. 1914 was the year UBC construction began. In high school, we are taught that 1914 is when WWI starts, an events that displays human nature at its worst. It’s actually amazing to think that 3 years prior in 1911, Thomas Hunt Morgan described that genes are arranged on a chromosome. We never look back at history but it’s really cool to think that more than a 100 years ago this idea came to light. And so much has been discovered since then. Thomas Hunt Morgan can be considered a pioneer and to think his discoveries came around the same time as WWI. I think it’s a perfect example of how much positivity and negativity exists within the human potential.

In 1937, Hans Krebs discovered the citric acid cycle, something that is an inherent part of our cellular physiology. Two years later, WWII broke out, the worst display of human nature known in history. It’s just really amazing to think that around the time that human history is going through the worst wars ever known, there is advancement being made in other areas. Some advancements were bad but most of them has made a positive impact on our lives somehow or another. It’s just really interesting to look at it from that perspective.

Informal Post #1 – Group portion of the 1st midterm exam

The group of the exam was interesting because on the one hand, I learned something new both in terms of factual knowledge and working in tandem with others. On the other hand, I also learned that I was wrong on a lot of questions and I lost marks. I think there is a lot to learn from the group portion. It really is a great learning moment, particularly if you are at odds with the other members of the group. As you defend the position of why you think your answer is more applicable than another suggested answer to a question, the concepts and ideas that you are trying to communicate become more engrained into your mind. I think that is really great. My answers also greatly improved in the group portion because I saw how other people perceive the same question that I had; you learn to think about questions from different angles. Overall, I think group activities/exams are a good idea. I know it’s been in development for several years. I remember going through BIOL 112 with group activities. I think it’s something that UBC needs to look at and focus more attention on. I really think it can improve the amount of information students absorb during their time at UBC.

Learning Journal #2 – Conceptual vs. Factual Knowledge

  1. Factual knowledge
  2. Please describe, briefly, one new piece of factual knowledge that you acquired or developed so far in the BIOL463.

I have learned how maternal genes regulate gap genes, how gap genes regulate pair-rule genes, and how pair-rule genes regulate segment polarity genes. It was also very interesting to learn that gap genes can regulate other gap genes and pair-rule genes can regulate other pair-rule genes. It is amazing to see the intricate levels of regulation that goes into development. In particular, we learned that Bicoid and Giant interact with the eve2 enhancer and this interaction directs eve expression in stripe 2 of the Drosophila embryo.

 

 

  1. Please describe how you know that you have acquired or developed this piece of factual knowledge, and provide some evidence for it.

Before the Feb 4th class started, Dr. Kalas drew a diagram of segment polarity regulation in Drosophila, which displayed everything I mentioned in the above question. In addition, we analyzed figures from the Arnosti et al. (1996) paper to draw conclusions about what the data represents. In this way, we were able to convert conceptual knowledge about gene regulation in Drosophila into factual knowledge (Bicoid and Giant regulate eve expression in stripe 2 of the Drosophila embryo.

  1. Conceptual knowledge
  2. Please describe, briefly, one new piece of conceptual knowledge that you acquired or developed so far in BIOL463.

I have learned that the collective techniques 3C, 4C, and 5C are great for determining which segments of a genome are closely interacting with each other. All three techniques use the same procedures initially but differ in the end; 3C requires qPCR, 4C requires inverse PCR, and 5C requires LMA.

 

 

  1. Please describe how you know that you have acquired or developed this piece of conceptual knowledge, and provide some evidence for it.

During the techniques “speed-dating” session, I saw a presentation about the 3C, 4C, 5C techniques. This is still conceptual knowledge for me as I have never personally conducted these techniques nor can I verify whether these techniques are capable of providing of providing the results they are known for. Although many scientists have likely conducted and verified these techniques, I have yet to see the evidence; hence I consider it conceptual knowledge.

  1. Skills
  2. Please describe, briefly, one skill that you acquired or developed/are developing so far in BIOL463.

BIOL 463 is challenging me to develop my ability to critically analyze and question data that is put in front of me. This is a very valuable skill to have. I am excited to see how I can develop this skill further for the rest of this course.

 

 

  1. Please describe how you know that you have acquired or developed this skill, and provide some evidence for it.

We are asked to analyze figures and draw conclusions rather than read explanations for what the figures indicate directly from the paper. We just did this with the Arnosti et al. (1996) paper where we analyzed the figures to determine which transcription factors regulate eve expression in stripe 2. If I was only asked to read the paper, I don’t think I would have gotten as much out of it. I think this is the best way to develop analytical skills in a research-based capacity and I look forward to doing more of this.

 

 

  1. What is factual knowledge useful for?

 

Think about a piece of factual knowledge that you developed/acquired. Briefly describe what you think it is useful for.

                        From the Arnosti et al. paper, I have learned that Bicoid and Giant interacts with the eve2 enhancer and helps regulate eve expression in stripe 2 of the Drosophila embryo. This knowledge is useful for many reasons. It reiterates that Bicoid/Giant are important transcription factors for development. This information is also useful because it shows that gene regulation doesn’t occur with only one transcription factor or one level of regulation. Multiple modes of regulation (transcription factors) are required in specific combinations at specific locations within an embryo to direct the expression of a gene. Without this complexity, we wouldn’t exist. Finally, this knowledge is important because it can help elucidate other regulation mechanisms that dictate developmental patterns.

           

Final Project question for feedback

When we were asked to do the first homework assignment for BIOL 463, I talked about focusing on dystrophin as a project topic. My second question was about Asthma. After thinking about it more, Asthma and all the research associated with it has really captured my attention. Asthma is gradually becoming a major issue in North America, and despite all the work done on it, we can’t really say that there has been much of an advancement in terms of solving this chronic disease.

As there is so many different variables to asthma, it’s better to focus on a certain aspect of it. So my research question would be this:

Q. The increased incidence of asthma in North America over the last decade has been hypothesized to be a result of increased epigenetically-derived changes being passed down. What epigenetic changes are responsible for higher incidence of asthma? Can certain epigenetic markers be associated with someone being at higher risk for asthma incidence?

Please let me know if the question is too broad or if you find any other issues with it. I’m always looking for feedback.

Cheers!