Notoriety and Anonymity in the Graffiti World

I love the temporality and changing accessibility of this location. In order to write here, you would have to time your arrival at low tide, and it is only visible either from the beach at low tide or out on the water. The only way to view it from above, and therefore from the million dollar Kitsilano homes under which the pieces appear, would be to exit your backyard, perch on the foot-wide seawall and look straight down. This is not somewhere that you pass by each day on your way to school or work, this is a place that you have to seek out.

“Pasoe” tags are very common in Kits and Point Grey. As is often the case with any distinct and replicated graffiti art, once I was shown a “Pasoe” tag I began to see them everywhere. I’m fascinated by the idea of how well known an artist can be in an area or neighborhood (notorious) without necessarily being known as a person (anonymous). Halsey and Young talk about the act of writing graffiti as a way of connecting “self” to the “world”, and about the impact of recognition within the graffiti community as impetus to continue participating (Halsey and Young 2006:278). While “world” in this context can, and does, refer to shared public space, it can also be interpreted as the graffiti writing community. Within that world, the simultaneous existence of notoriety and anonymity contributes significantly to the uniqueness of graffiti art and its systems of recognition, reoccurrence and replication.

 

 

 

 

 

 

By Sj Kerr-Lapsley

Halsey, M and A. Young.
2006   ‘Our desires are ungovernable’: Writing graffiti in urban space. Theoretical     Criminology 10(3):275-306

2 thoughts on “Notoriety and Anonymity in the Graffiti World

  1. I think anonymity definitely adds power to art. It’s that element of mystery (as well as the element of defiance) that gives every graffiti post, whether it’s a tag or a mural, that much more meaning 🙂

  2. Couldn’t agree more with this post. Kits has some crazy locations of graffiti, and with regards to the socio-economic dimensions of the place, graffiti is a real “slap-in-the-face” against the arguably monotone culture that Kits evokes. And then when you see this type of graffiti, it just ends up being impossible to to just focus on the work itself instead of being busy analyzing the person behind it. Was it a man, woman, kid, poor, rich, bored person? doesn’t always matter. but that its there, that matters.

    And Tal, in regards to the possibility of being anonymous, we could always just post our student numbers as a means of identification, if that isn’t a too big administrative hassle that is.

Leave a Reply