{"id":24,"date":"2017-10-31T18:06:42","date_gmt":"2017-11-01T01:06:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/antoninlast100\/?p=24"},"modified":"2017-10-31T18:06:42","modified_gmt":"2017-11-01T01:06:42","slug":"week-9-commerce-coercion-and-americas-empire","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/antoninlast100\/2017\/10\/31\/week-9-commerce-coercion-and-americas-empire\/","title":{"rendered":"Week 9 &#8211; Commerce, Coercion, and America&#8217;s Empire"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Whilst we had previously looked at America&#8217;s involvement and intervention in Latin America in a more political sense, this week&#8217;s lecture focused more on the cultural and economic aspects of their presence. I couldn&#8217;t help but try to find the similarities with European colonization that had taken place in continental Africa, yet immediately, from the beginning of Dawson&#8217;s chapter, we are told that this was different because America saw themselves as anti-imperialist. I found this to be really interesting because it seems as though America truly thought they were solely acting in a beneficiary manner in terms of bringing economic opportunity through trade, as well as exposing many of these countries to American culture. Nonetheless, I find that the possible reasons that formed the basis of America&#8217;s involvement in Latin America enough to question whether this is actually true. I think that the lines are blurred at this point because, on the one hand, one could say this was simply a way of globalizing its economy and stretching its economic influence, whilst on the other, it&#8217;s easy to say that this was clear evidence of America wanting to become a dominant superpower.<\/p>\n<p>Another interesting point that stood out to me was the huge impact that the building of the Panama Canal had on this subject of American intervention. I had not previously known of the intricacies that came with the building of the Canal, including that the value of American investment in the region, jumped from around $308 million in 1897 to $2 billion by 1929. Although this didn&#8217;t result in any further direct US government involvement in the region (apart from the Canal being under its jurisdiction for several years), it cannot be understated how important this would&#8217;ve been for the American economy. In particular, it would have been a big marker in achieving what I described previously as a way of globalizing its economy and stretching its economic influence, yet even more straightforward, it would have allowed the US to expand its trade routes whilst also simplifying them.<\/p>\n<p>Lastly, after reading the piece by Ariel Dorfman and Armand Mattelart, I found it valuable to gain an insight into one of the Latin American perspectives of American involvement in the region. In my opinion, one of the main things I gathered was that there was a huge aspect of deceit and disguise in relation to how American involvement was perceived. And I think that the question of what extent was this aspect of deceit and disguise purely based on Latin American perception, addresses interesting points.<\/p>\n<p>Thanks for reading,<\/p>\n<p>Antonin<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Whilst we had previously looked at America&#8217;s involvement and intervention in Latin America in a more political sense, this week&#8217;s lecture focused more on the cultural and economic aspects of their presence. I couldn&#8217;t help but try to find the similarities with European colonization that had taken place in continental Africa, yet immediately, from the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":35853,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1431140],"tags":[2928413,2944641,284763,2944850,2916085],"class_list":["post-24","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-week-nine","tag-american-influence","tag-deceit","tag-disguise","tag-economic-globalisation","tag-panama-canal"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/antoninlast100\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/antoninlast100\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/antoninlast100\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/antoninlast100\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/35853"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/antoninlast100\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/antoninlast100\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/antoninlast100\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24\/revisions\/25"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/antoninlast100\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/antoninlast100\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/antoninlast100\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}