Carmen Laforet’s Nada

I decided to go with this book to challenge myself and I’m glad I did. I really enjoyed reading this week’s read of Laforet’s Nada. I was really intrigued by the title because I vaguely remembered that  “nada” means nothing in Spanish. Then I read the transcript confirming my thoughts stating, “[a]fter all, a narrative about her experience has cohered in some way, in the book that we are reading and that is now coming to its conclusion, a book that makes “nothing” its theme, that makes something out of nothing. Perhaps “nothing” (Nada) is precisely what she takes from her year in Barcelona” (Beasley-Murray, Pg. 2-3). I can sort of recognize this theme by the way the story began and ended with Andrea entering and leaving Barcelona. Which makes me wonder if that correlates together with the title? Another thing, I kept in my mind while reading was the possible significance of the highlighted statements on the digital version. At first, I thought it was going to be distracting but it was actually really helpful and a bit exciting if there were a lot of highlights on the page.

I was fascinated by how Laforet portrayed each character with great detail while also showcasing how the war impacted all of them and the house overall. Quotes such as “I was afraid to get into the bed that resembled a coffin” and “I never sleep, child, I’m always doing something in the house at night. I never, ever sleep” (pg. 9) really captured a visual of how the family is mourning. I also liked the narrator having inside thoughts “[i]s it possible, I thought, that I am the protagonist in a ridiculous scene like this?” (pg. 182). It was different compared to the other novels we have read. Also, I noticed memories seem to be a common theme within this novel as did the previous ones, which makes me wonder about how someone in the class asked if memories are going to be a similarity between all the novels.

I noticed that throughout the novel continued to reference such as “[i]t was like the end of a novel” (pg. 38) and “[t]hat’s how it happens in novels, in movies, but not in life…”(pg. 206). It wasn’t until I reread the transcript lecture I understood the reference Laforet was trying to convey. That made it truly click for me to gain a full perspective of Andrea’s character as this is how she views the life surrounding her like a story.

A question I pose to my fellow classmates is, something similar mentioned within the lecture, do you think there is a correlation between the title and how Andrea views her life as a story? What do you guys think of the title translating to “nothing”?

The Shrouded Woman by María Luisa Bombal

I really enjoyed this week’s novel of The Shrouded Woman. I was looking forward to this week’s novel since it is the first one with a female author and I was intrigued if there was a noticeable difference between the previous books. One thing I noticed was a difference through the characters as the women were portrayed as more than just an object for the male gaze and actually showcased female characters with personalities.

I was really intrigued with the choice of the narrator being dead. It reminded me of a diary as it was a reflection of Ana María’s life. It revealed moments in her life that were happy, lonely, and regretful through a detailed perspective of each relationship which made it easy to engage with. A quote that really stood out to me was, “must we die in order to know certain things”? (pg. 176). It made me wonder about deeper aspects of death. Especially as Ana María had her siblings, her father, her first love, her husband, and her children visit her as she is deceased. I couldn’t imagine the feeling if she wanted to say something to them. It made me curious about the afterlife and the possibilities of what we may think or reflect. It also made me realize how short our connections can be and how we may fail to notice until it’s too late.

I found it interesting how the author captured Ana María’s relationships, especially her first love Ricardo. This quote also stood out to me, “I never knew. I only know that period following your departure was the most disordered and tragic in my entire life. Oh, the torture of first love, of the first disillusion! When one struggles with the past instead of forgetting it”! (pg. 167). This showcases how this first relationship truly affected her from ever moving on to having a successful relationship. Ricardo left her because he chose to pursue his career but she offered to move with him to remain together. This left me wondering was it a one-sided love and she was blinded by love to recognize it.

This was the type of novel I was expecting for this course and it went beyond my expectations. I am looking forward to this week’s discussion after skimming and noticing most of my classmate’s enjoyment of this read too! The question I pose to my classmates is since this is the first female author we’ve read so far, did you notice any differences in comparison to our last reads? Or do you think there was a purpose to make the main character a female?

Spam prevention powered by Akismet