Monthly Archives: November 2014

Social Enterprise and the Arc Initiative Reflection

If the United Nations was fully funded, would we need social enterprise, or initiatives like the Arc? In my opinion, yes, we would. Having a fully funded United Nations entity would be a remarkable and world changing movement to greater rights for all, less inequality, and an overall more peaceful world; nonetheless, I believe the social enterprises, and “the Arcs” of the world would be just as necessary to foster all of The UN’s work and delve more in depth into certain issues.

I see the UN as a large body that touches various and most social issues that affect the world, but the UN’s efforts in my opinion are made complete by social entrepreneurs who make it their mission to focus on a specific issue, such as gender inequality, and enact their vision as a solution for that issue.

I believe it is the social entrepreneurs – the ambitious, mission-driven, strategic people – who are inspired to take action with their aspirations and change the world for the better that embody the very values that the United Nations works to promote worldwide. I would say it is the Arc Initiatives of the world that take The UN’s actions a step further by actually providing that on-going “two way flow” of engagement and true grass roots interaction with communities to work towards building a community they see for themselves.

Overall, I would say money can buy all the resources and books needed to help build prosperous communities, but social enterprise and Arc are the outcomes of inspired minds coming together to work for change. And they are priceless.

Sources:

http://www.un.org/en/aboutun/

https://connect.ubc.ca/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_45358_1%26url%3D

http://www.clipartbest.com/cliparts/Rid/6eA/Rid6eAni9.png

Leave a Comment

Filed under Comm 101, 102

To Uber or Not to Uber: Classmate Blog Response

http://www.betcheslovethis.com/files/uploads/images/SweetLemonMag-UberCoolUberCabUber.jpg

My classmate Gaurika Sharma recently wrote a blog post on Uber’s potential entry into Vancouver’s taxi market, a topic that I am particularly interested in. Gaurika suggests a “there can only be one” possibility with the emergence of Uber’s services in Vancouver, and I tend to agree with her, not necessarily because I do not think Uber and taxis can co-exist, but more so because I do not think Uber should be allowed entrance into the taxi market.

Coincidentally,  in my recent Economics tutorial I was given an article about Uber’s attempt to “revolutionise taxi markets,” and therefore have gained some insight into Uber’s business model. While Uber is known to provide slightly cheaper prices than a regular “street-hailed cab,” during periods of high demand, such as holidays, Uber spikes prices up to seven times normal fares- a clear depiction of price discrimination.

I have several relatives that work in the taxi industry, and from their perspective, if Uber were allowed into Vancouver, their numbers of customers would decrease substantially, and with most cab drivers earning a bulk of their profits during rush times such as holidays, there would be a conspicuous discrimination against these cab drivers as well with Uber make much more money for the same distance drives.

While I have a bias for the taxi industry and opinion that Uber should be kept out of Vancouver, I realize that Uber’s dynamic pricing could be a needed disturbance to the taxi industry from a microeconomics point of view. Ultimately, if taxi drivers want to keep Uber off their territory, they are going to need to ensure the government hears their opinions.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Comm 101, 102

Happy Employees make for Happy Customers

 

Zappos has a unique 360-day return policy, allowing customers ample time to return any purchases they don't end up loving.

Zappos has a unique 360-day return policy, allowing customers ample time to return any purchases they don’t end up loving.

 

American shoe retailer Zappos is a prime example of an organization which possesses a vibrant corporate culture. Upon reading Alexandra Jacobs’s “Happy Feet,” I concluded one thing for certain: I would love to work for Zappos. And, in my opinion, that’s what having a strong organizational culture is all about- having people who want to work for you because you are renowned for your positive relationships and treatment of employees. I believe Zappos does an effective job in fostering employees to embody company values, by providing extensive training and benefits to motivate employees to represent Zappos to the best of their abilities. At Zappos, I would say employees walk the talk, or actually believe in what their company stands for, and therefore prompt customers to do the same.

In class, it was interesting to participate in the debate for or against Zappos’ benefits for their employees. Despite the great costs to maintain all these employee benefits, intriguingly most students, when given the choice of which side they would prefer to be on, chose the side of keeping employee benefits. In an ideal world, I think we all would love to have 100% of our Medicare covered, exciting employee activities and of course, who wouldn’t love daily free food? Overall, as a fellow classmate mentioned, most shoe retailers make 20% in profits, while Zappos makes only 5%. Nevertheless, perhaps in this unique environment established by company CEO Tony Hsieh, the lively culture that promotes happy and productive employees comes before the profit. While feasibly not all companies can be like Zappos, this shoe retailer certainly has set the standards for a successful corporate culture and is a refreshing company to hear about.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Comm 101, 102, Uncategorized

Finally Getting Warmer to the Solution

Suzanne Goldenberg’s article “Pentagon: global warming will change how US military trains and goes to war,” illustrates how even one of the world’s mightiest armies cannot evade the inevitable effects of global warming.

The military faces the daunting task of adapting to the increasingly changing climate of today, and the future.

Upon reading just the subtitle of this article, I was intrigued to see how the military must adapt to changing environments by making tactical decisions in regards to planning and operations, just as any business would need to in order to adapt to a changing market.

I recalled the concept of the triple bottom line, and its connection to the military’s aims for successful operations. Particularly, the military is just now coming to recognize climate change as a primary factor affecting pivotal budgeting and operational decisions, despite having established climate change as a “threat multiplier” for years. As a result, I believe by not preparing for the progress of climate change early on, the military wasted vital time in which they could have developed efficient strategies to ready their troops for changing climates. I feel the American military’s failure to consider the environment pillar of their triple bottom line shows how even having just one weak pillar of the three causes the bottom line as a whole to weaken.

When, alas, military officials finally realized that climate change “indeed is a risk today,” I would propose that their realization has come much later than needed, and now the military is faced with the challenge of re-vamping budgeting, operational, and field decisions as the clock is ticking and climate change is only increasing in severity.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Comm 101, 102, Uncategorized