A Busy Few Weeks in Astu!

Hey there readers!

This week instead of writing a personal blog post about a specific topic, it’s my job to read through my classmate’s blogs and give you a bit of a recap. It has been several weeks since we last posted, so there was quite a bit of material covered, meaning the blogs this week covered a lot of ground. I’ll try to cover a few different topics that came up.

We read two very heart wrenching books in the last two weeks revolving around war. The first was a book called Obasan by Joy Kogawa a novel about a woman recounting her experiences as a young Japanese girl living in British Columbia during World War II, a time of Japanese-Canadian Internment.

This week Paolina wrote her blog about Obasan but focused on how it relates to the idea of cultural and collective. She wrote towards the end of her blog “It reached a great importance even if the characters in it are fictional and became part of Canada’s cultural memory”. She explains that even though it is not a true account the Kogawa’s story has become part of the way we remember and understand these events. She reached farther by asking the important question “But how reliable is cultural memory if it is based on constant remediation of previous memories?”. Clara also wrote her blog this week on Obasan, however, she took a different approach and tied the story into her own life experiences. She tell us about a family friend’s grandfather. He was a Japanese- Canadian man attending UBC at the time of the war. She explains to us that he was expelled from the university at the time, but has recently been given an honorary degree along with the other survivors who attended UBC at the time. This is something I found incredibly interesting because I had no idea that this happened, and I hadn’t considered what must have happened to Japanese students attending university in Canada at the time of the war.

The other book we read was Safe Area Gorazde by journalist Joe Sacco. Safe Are Gorazde is a graphic “journal” about the Bosnian war in the 1990’s. Sacco was an American visiting Gorazde and taking interviews from the locals and survivors in order to recount the war. Isaiah explains that as an American Sacco represented many things to the Bosnian people, but most of all he represents the idea of “escape”. He explains that while they have no choice to leave Joe sacco can come and go as he pleases. This is something that all of the citizens of Gorazde long for. In class we talked a lot about the idea that the locals are trapped and isolated while Sacco has the freedom to just flash his blue card and he can leave immediately and go wherever he pleases. He had mobility.

Alex wrote about the book from a different point of view. He chose to write about the way Sacco illustrate his story. He compares Sacco’s very detailed depictions of events and people against Marjane Satrapi’s simple and stark drawings in Persepolis. He writes “as soon as I saw the first illustration in Safe Area Gorazde I knew the two graphic novels were about as different as they could possibly be”.  Alex explains that he sees Satrapi’s style as a way to represent the “conformity” she saw during the war, while Sacco “encompasses graphic detail in to his illustration in order to further emphasize the dramatic violence that occurred during the Bosnian genocide that occurred in the 1990s”.

This week Ryan decided to write about something aside from the books we’ve been reading. His blog post was about all of the academic article we have been reading in class and how new they are to him. He explains that in this field the ideas are very abstract and it can be hard to determine whose ideas are “right” or “wrong” because unlike hard sciences there are no formulas or hard evidence to back them up. He quotes Dr. Erikson “’when one states they are just, they are immediately unjust’” and explains that he thinks this idea could also be relevant in this context. He expands on it asking the question “Can this be used in the context of when one states they are right, they are wrong?”.

Thanks for reading!

 

Love,

Olivea

2 thoughts on “A Busy Few Weeks in Astu!

  1. Elizabeth Khuu

    Great blog post this week, Clara! I just wanted to comment on what you had to say about the clash between the two cultures. Like you, I myself am also part of two cultures and I have found that throughout my life at times I have struggled to find balance between the two. Which brings me back to your question about whether or not we can truly be part of two cultures. I would argue that you can be part of two cultures and that it is just a matter of who you are surrounded by in the current situation. For instance, I find myself to be more Western around my friends as opposed to when I am with my family.

    Reply
  2. Clara

    This is a comment for Paolina’s blog from this week:

    Paolina brings up a very interesting point regarding truthfulness of past memories and history. One question she poses at the end of her blog is: “Is it possible to get a real picture of a historical event?” I personally do not believe that it is possible to get an accurate and “true” overall historical account of a past event. History is composed of a a number of different perspectives and memories from a variety of people. Taking the example of war, it is most often the winners of the war that recount what has happened. The vanquished may have a completely different account of the events that took place during the war but their side of the story will most likely not end up in the history books. Even if we could go back in time to verify the validity of certain facts concerning historical events, the validation or new facts about the event will always be told from someones perspective. It is therefore very hard to obtain a bias and neutral examination of historical events. I equally think that someones perspective of an event is limited because they cannot possibly experience every aspect of a historical even. It is the job of historians, after an event has happened to go back and try to piece together different accounts of the same event in an attempt to obtain a clearer idea of what happened. But it is still only fragments of what has happened and by no means a full account of the events. In either of these cases, from one persons or several peoples perspectives, it seems very difficult to obtain a “real picture of a historical event” (Paolina). It would be a great interest to also examine what the term “real picture” means. Does it mean the “truthfulness” of an event? That is how I have interpreted it but it may be interpreted in a number of different ways.

    – Clara Chang

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *