Recommendation: A Coyote Columbus Story

Standard

This week I taught a lesson on writing a recommendation about a book for a book report. The students write 3 or 4 book reports a term, on award winning novels of different genres. The students reports showed that very few of them understood how to write a recommendation. Many simply wrote: “I do not have one.”

I started a lesson by giving them a simple formula for writing a recommendation. It must include two things: your personal opinion and specific examples from the book to support criticism or praise. I shared a few examples with them. I told them to use elements of story that stood out to them. I told them try writing about the strengths and weakness of the novel.

Slide2 Slide3 Slide4

We then practiced writing recommendations. I had the students create a T chart with the titles: positive and negative.  I read them A Coyote Columbus Story  by Thomas King. While I was reading they had to write down things they liked and didn’t like using specific examples on their T chart. Afterwards each student wrote a positive and negative recommendation.

I have to admit that I selected this book for a secondary reason. I am planning on teaching a unit on Ancient Civilizations of the North America. I used this book as a thermometer of sorts to gage the students reactions to the content of the book. The book uses many Indigenous storytelling methods from oral traditions and presents an Indigenous worldview of the Columbus encounter. All but five of the students were completely baffled by the story. Many were uncomfortable with the ideas presented but most were downright confused. Which is a very good thing for me to know about the class. It gives me an entry point for my unit.

Practicum Application

Standard

What I have learned through this inquiry process is there are no easy answers or solutions. The gaps and waste of human potential will continue for years to come. It is only through deliberate, hard word that things will get better. Both settlers and Indigenous people have things to bring to the table. Decolonization is about the advancement of Indigenous interests and rights not some metaphor for social justice in general. I’ve learned it is important to carve out space for the unique needs Indigenous learners because of the unique injustices they face.

Articles like this one from the CBC give me hope that people are aware of the issues and are working towards doing something to change the current pattern.

http://www.cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/the-current-for-february-18-2016-1.3453054/b-c-moves-to-address-racism-of-low-expectations-for-indigenous-students-1.3453069

In my practicum, I will try and bring Indigenous worldviews into the classroom. I will attempt to help my students understand the truthful history of this country. I will attempt to help my students understand the roles and settlers and Indigenous people in moving forward. However, I have no faith I will be successful at this.

Annotated Bibliography

Standard
  1. Brendtro, L. K., Brokenleg, M., & Bockern, S. V. (2002). Reclaiming youth at risk: Our hope for the future. Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service.

This book lays out the circle of courage, a framework of raising children according to Native American principals and values. The circle of courage framework is important to my inquiry project because it comes from Indigenous philosophy and worldview. While there is significant overlap between the CASEL SEL wheel and other ways of supporting young people, it was important to explore a framework that was informed by decolonized thinking. The circle of courage may hold some of the answers about how to bridge the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous learners.

2. Hermes, M. (2000) The scientific method, Nintendo, and Eagle feathers: Rethinking the meaning of “culture-based” curriculum at an Ojibwe tribal school, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13:4, 387-400, DOI: 10.1080/095183900413340

This article explores the dichotomy that is created between academics and culture when both have separate goals in First Nations education. When we separate academics and culture into two distinct areas of achievement we reduce the value of both. The author suggests a merging of the two. While not a decolonized approach it is a plausible solution to some of the current gaps between Indigenous and non-Indigenous learners.

3. Joseph, P. B. (2000). Cultures of curriculum. Mahwah, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates.

This textbook lays out six goals of education from a western view point. It was important to explore what the goals of the Western education system are in order to compare them to an Indigenous worldview. I believe that the difference between Western and Indigenous goals for education is a key part of the puzzle when trying to figure out why there is so little progress toward addressing the current gaps. The two sides want different things from the system and view the system very differently.

4. Kinew, W. (2015) The Reason You Walk. Penguin Canada

This book is a work of creative non-fiction that explores what reconciliation means on a personal level. It talks about the hard work that reconciliation takes on both the parts of Indigenous individuals and settlers. It explores the motivations behind the hard work. It really taught me that if Canadians want to make this work they have to work together until the job is done.

5. Giles, W. & Travis, T. [Button Poetry]. (2015, Dec 23) Oral Traditions. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3pslYJjpDo

This is a spoken-word piece that explores the loss of language and the complicated process of reclaiming oral traditions. Decolonization is about reclaiming Indigenous spaces and knowledge. This piece explores the emotions of decolonization. I tried to take a wholistic approach to this inquiry and it was important for me to explore the art and emotionality of this topic.

6. Rasmussen, D (2011). Some Honest Talk about Non-Indigenous Education. Our Schools/Our Selves, 20(2), 19-33

This article discusses the very different concepts of education of Euro-Canadians and Indigenous peoples. This was important to my inquiry question because the difference between how education is conceptualized informs what each party wants from the system. The disconnect leads to different goals and a lack of progress towards addressing the current gaps that exist. There needs to be some kind of understanding between the groups to allow for the hard work to begin.

7. Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1-40. Retrieved January 15, 2016, from http://decolonization.org/index.php/des/article/view/18630/15554

This article speaks about how decolonization is the deliberate working towards Indigenous rights and interests. It is not a synonym for social justice. This is an important understanding to have when addressing decolonization. Sometimes we get caught up in working towards general social justice and forget about the specific injustices that Indigenous people face.

Living Inquiry

Standard

In the second group I joined we talked about active learning, play and outdoor learning. I was really inspired by the diversity of views on the topic.

The group had a great conversation around being outdoors and incorporating technology. We ended up talking about what technology actually is. We started out with GPS and ipads and quickly reframed to older technology. We discussed using compasses and older forms of way finding (natural markers, the sun).

In the beginning, the PLTECH cohort members felt limited by having to incorporate technology into outdoor play based learning. After we reframed what technology is we had a deeper conversation.

Everyone in the group had a memory of active outdoor learning that happened in their school experience. We all agreed these were memorable lessons and that we wanted more of this learning to happen in our teaching. I walked away inspired to explore geocaching and placed based learning with my Grade 7’s.

What is educational success?

Standard

What is the goal of education?

This questions has been answered may times over by scholars, institutions, and philosophers. According to the textbook Cultures of Curriculum edited by Pamela Bolotin Joseph there are six purposes “training for work and survival”, “connecting to the canon”, “developing self and spirit”, “constructing understading”, “deliberating democracy”, and “confronting the dominant order” (2001). This seems to be a fairly comprehensive list of the many goals of Western education. Of course the many interest groups in society would all prefer that education did a little bit more of one than the others.

When I attempt to answer this question I go back to what is the goal of raising a child. This is as close to the same questions as I can get, as my ancestors did not have a formal education system. Of course we had/have cultural transmission systems that fulfilled the same functions as education does for Euro-Canadains. These are simply embedded in our culture.

The answer is pretty simple. My Elders taught me that the goal of raising a child is that one day they might be an Elder. An Elder is a person who holds a meaningful role within my community as a holder of wisdom and experience. They are loved and cared for by the community because they are invaluable to its functioning.

Rasmussen explores the restaurant model of education. How Euro-Canadians assume every culture had some form of education. That we start to look for evidence of education within cultures. Cultural knowledge transmission happens in every culture but this does not mean that it happens within the narrow confines of what settlers would call education (formal schooling). The analogy is drawn between every culture has food but we do not go looking for evidence of restaurants in every culture.

Measurement/Benchmarks:

In the Western world, educational success could be said to be measured by the highest level you achieve in the formal schooling system. It could be argued that a PhD is the highest level to be achieved. This is a hierarchy and relies on more knowledgable strangers, on the written word, and a complex system to achieve.

If the goal of raising a child is for that child to one day become an Elder of the community, how do measure this? How do you know they are living a well lived life? Contributing? Making mistakes and learning from them? Living according to traditional values and teaching?

With the large gap between understandings of success how can we reconcile these? What becomes more important? Should Indigenous learners be measured according to the levelled system or on their progress toward being an Elder?

A dichotomy is often created in First Nations schools between academic and cultural goals and achievements. Mary Hermes explores this complex relationship in her article. She suggests that bringing academics and culture together in measurement is better than separate goals. I believe this is the path forward. We need to bring these two very different idea of education together without loosing either. Not a small task. It will take years of dedication and hard work, but hopefully in a few generations there will be some change.

References.

Joseph, P. B. (2000). Cultures of curriculum. Mahwah, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates.

Rasmussen, Derek (2011). Some Honest Talk about Non-Indigenous Education. Our Schools/Our Selves, 20(2), 19-33

Mary Hermes (2000) The scientific method, Nintendo, and Eagle feathers: Rethinking the meaning of “culture-based” curriculum at an Ojibwe tribal school, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13:4, 387-400, DOI: 10.1080/095183900413340

 

“The Reason You Walk”

Standard

book cover - the reason you walk

This week I read The Reason You Walk by Wab Kinew. Earlier in the term I had attended a talk with Wab and he talked a little about the book. I remembered his introduciton and realized this book might have some of the answers I was looking for.

Decolonization has become a slippery theoretical eel to me. I cannot quite grasp it without crushing it or hammering its head into the cutting board.

The Reason You Walk explores the Wab’s reconciliation with his father. It is a work of creative non-fiction. He discusses the Indian Act, the current state of politics in Canada, and the deep hurts of colonization. The climax is when Wab’s father traditionally adopts the Arch Bishop of the Anglican Church. This act symbolizes a deep forgiveness and a true act of reconciliation. Wab’s father had been horrifically abused in Indian Residential School and had worked his whole life to help his community heal. The price his family paid was emotional distance.

Wab’s father dies of cancer and on his journey to death he works in relationship with Wab to repair their broken bond. By the end they are best friends. This understanding is hard earned.

Wab explores what reconciliation and decolonization means on deeply personal level. What I learned is that decolonization and true reconciliation is about hard work. Work that takes daily, conscious effort. Decolonization is not an easy thing. In fact my good friend, former olympian, and survior of a stab to the chest by a Canadian solider during Oka puts it this way:

“I recently was talking to someone about colonization and decolonization. They are the buzz words these days and my friend wanted to understand it all in what he called “normal” English and not all academic. So I said ” have you ever seen the movie Wolverine?” He said “um Yah, why?” I said remember that black spider thing the woman put on wolverine’s heart? Well let’s say that colonization. That thing clamped on to his heart was designed to suck his special life energy out of him. It was ultimately changing who he was, by slowing his healing and would have killed him if he left it there.
Well he had two decisions; dye slowly while his life is sucked out of him, the less immediately painful choice but ultimately would lead to his demise and he would die not being who he once was…or option 2 was to reach in and rip it out, potentially dying…the more painful but in the end he could regain who he was and he knew there was a good chance he would recover. He decided to “decolonize” his heart..it was hard painful and almost killed him..but he was able to survive it and be what he once was.
I said to my friend, if we are to decolonize, some of the things that have clamped onto our hearts, and almost feel like they are part of us..are really what are killing us..and ripping them out is potentially going to a bit painful, be we have to remember we have the same ability to recover and be strong again….just like wolverine.”
                                  Waneek Horn-Miller

Throughout the book Wab talks about walking in a good way and the red path. Decolonization is a road you walk. You walk it for love. Settlers and Indigenous people both have to walk this road together. Action is what is important.

In education, this means we have consciously walk towards decolonization in our classrooms, policies, resources, pedagogy, and curriculum. Twenty years ago the Royal Commission on Aboriginal People’s gave us action items around education. We have failed miserably.  Eleven years ago, the Kelowna Accord gave us directives on closing the gap including in education. We have failed miserably. Last year the Truth and Reconciliation gave us calls to action, many around education. Hopefully, we do not fail again.

If we work together, in relationship, with intention as  settlers and Indigenous people, maybe, just maybe we can tackle these gaps that continue to rob Canada of immeasurable human potential.

Building Character

Standard

This week I taught a lesson on the literary element of character. I was feeling experimental. So I tried out a few different things.

I’ve realized I don’t really like writing on the board and talking at the same time. Never mind the fact that it’s a very inefficient way of communicating, it just feels rude. So I made a short powerpoint. It worked really well except that the projector is quite old and at face level by the end of the lesson I was boiling hot from the fan blowing hot air at me. I’ll troubleshoot that for next time.

Slide1 Slide2 Slide3 Slide4 Slide5 Slide6 Slide7

Throughout the powerpoint portion of the lesson I asked questions and had the students think of examples. During our discussion of protagonist and antagonist, a student asked if the protagonist always had to be a “good guy”.  This led us to and interesting talk about anti-heros and how a protagonist could switch to an antagonist. The students gave plenty of example and it was dynamic discussion.

I found that when I asked for an example of each type of character every student wanted to give their example. This has been a pattern in the class. However, it would take up too much time to allow everyone a chance to share their example with the class. This bothered me because I didn’t want to squash their enthusiasm for their answer. After taking a few examples I had the idea to have them share with the person next to them. This seemed to work pretty well. The room became quite loud and I only gave them a minute to share. Both time efficient and everyone had chance to share. I used this strategy again when we were discussion character traits. I extended by allowing them to share with one other person because I really wanted them to have lots of characteristic words in their minds.

To demonstrate the importance of character to story I had the students discuss with a partner how the story of Cinderella would have been different if Cinderella hadn’t been beautiful (a change in apperance). Then they discussed a change in motivation (what if she hadn’t wanted to get married but had wanted to own her own farm instead?). They really seemed to “get” how changing one thing about a character changes the story after their discussion.

I read the class the first chapter of Sherman Alexie’s The Absolutely True Diary of a Part Time Indian. Their task was a to write a list of 30 things they knew about the character by the end of the reading. At first they thought I was ridiculous and it would be impossible. The challenge kept them on task and engaged during the reading. Afterwards we built a class list of what they had written, popcorn style. Then we worked on a list of implicit characterization. This was great to see what they thought of the main character. A few quiet students surprised me with their insightful answers.

Next, we built a list of the characteristics of Katniss Everdeen from the Hunger Games series together. All but three students had read the book or seen the movie. They came up with all kinds of generalizations and implicit character traits. This activity reinforced one of the main points of the lesson. I pulled names from the popsicle jar to allow everyone to share.

Then I had the class move their desks into four equal islands by way of a brain break. Of course all the boys on one side of the room decided to make an island. So I grabbed the class list and created groups on the fly. This was a carousel activity. Each island had a short reading (three from novels and one wordless picture book) the task was to create a list of what things they knew about the character and put and I or E beside for implicit and explicit. The groups rotated through the islands. The trick was there could be no repeated traits. So after the first group wrote all of the obvious things they had to work harder to for implicit characteristics. The most surprising thing about their lists was that the wordless picture book had the most characteristics both implicit and explicit.

The final activity was a self-assessment form. The form had three headings: 3 things I learned about character, 2 things I still want to know, Give yourself a rating out of five for your contribution to your group and list 2 contributions. I was really happy with the students learning columns.

So, as you might guess this lesson took a long time. I taught from 1:15pm  to 2:45pm. Sherry said all of the learning activities were valid and great for the students. However, I realized and she said this probably could have been three lesson. I’m unsure why I over planned so much. Truthfully, I’ve been pretty slammed by life lately and probably just didn’t take the time to think about my class carefully enough.