Lesson 1.3: I called Pandora back, but she put me on hold

It was late. Armageddon22 was three hours late for work in his part of the world. Daisyswillrerise was three hours late for bed. Godschosenwitness was missing school. RedRoversOnPluto had nothing better to be doing. Jumpindon’tlook was bored one morning. So, “Jump” logged in to an online chat-she’d heard that might be fun from a friend, and wanted to try it.

(Who knows if any of these anonymous pseudonyms is male or female or something less socially definable, but since language doesn’t really seem to have evolved to support story telling without the use of gendered pronouns, let’s alternate, and think of them as the meaningless place holders they are.)

Anyway, back to Jump, who clicked around chat groups, insulated communities of all shapes and sizes, no definable location or segregation, except for their closed off attitude, their exclusive interest in one topic or area of life, imposing societal boundaries on a medium that could theoretically work just fine without them. Then, he found them. A group who seemed to be having fun, telling scary stories, like they were sitting around an exclusively anonymous global campfire. They were faceless, but distinctive. Colour Jump intrigued. She clicked “Join”.

Seconds later, accepted without reservation, he was thrown into an insanely competitive universe, a contest to scare one or other of their group off the internet for the night/day/moment, where ever they really were. They were all in the now, the moment, the relativistic present that was different for every one of them, and would be the past when the future arrived seconds later. Their activity lists, liked books, favourite movies, friends lists, user pics, and archived chats were so different, there was no relation between any of them.

Daisy was quiet, liked books and music and shades of pink and mauve and baking, a stereotype to fit with the first part of her pseudonym, on which an ironic pale was cast by the rest of her choice.

Armaggedon liked guns, heavy metal, and the good ol’US of ‘A-another stereotype, edged in shades of green.

RedRover liked space and red, Godschosen liked bible verses and church groups.

Are they having me on?, thought Jump. Is anyone really this one dimensionally stereotypical?

Still, Jump being no coward, he jumped right in to compete. The challenges got wilder and wilder-ghost stories, disaster stories, retold horror movies, invented horror movies, grisly tales of horror and death that left violent nightmares in their wake.

Jump was somehow being pulled into a world he wasn’t prepared for, something outside of his ordinary existence, something wild and untamed and crazy. She was loving every terrifying minute.

Then, it was suddenly his turn to present the ultimate challenge to the group. Everyone else had presented spine chilling tales, each out competing the last. This was it. Go big or go home, in or out. Win or lose. Jump had no intention of losing.

War. Hate. Horror.Supernatural insanity. Murderous terror.Friendly fire, terrorism, government corruption, corporate rot and disease, murder, mayhem, atrocities untold. Images, words, videos, pictures.

Jump had never mentioned she was a world class hacker. He could spin anything to look like anything, weave a story of imagination with threads of truth to create a narrative unparalleled in its believable depravity.

She pressed post, simultaneously broadcasting it. The response was cacophonous. Horror, disgust, outrage-no. Admiration, respect, awe-yes. But also, fear, worry, even terror.

Everyone agreed Jump had won unequivocally. RedRover, however, suggested he might have gone a bit far.

Daisy said “more than a bit not good there man.”

Armageddon forwarded him a link about Pandora’s box, with the tagline “might want to not leave that post up, as brilliant as it was.”

Godschosen said “we don’t need more pain in the world. Delete it, and be grateful we’re online where you can do that sort of thing; take back something you’ll regret.”

Jump “listened” politely, and then drew their attention to a live news feed on the edge of the blog.

They hadn’t known Jump was a hacker, and a very good one. They also hadn’t known Jump hated to lose, at anything.

The post had gone viral, sent to every major network on the planet simultaneously. With one click of a button, the world exploded into chaos and evil incarnate, all because of one story.

Jump posted one last time, before blinking out of existence like she’d never been there at all, “Next time, remember that in the modern world, nothing can ever really be deleted or taken back. Once it’s loose, once it’s out there, once a story has been told, it’s out there forever, and it can never be called back, never be taken back. Think before you type next time.”

I told this story to my brother and some of my friends, all of whom quite like stories about hacking and internet conspiracies. I discovered a couple things. First, they were astonished to find that this story was “taken” from another source with such a different setting, but still conveyed the same message, or attempted to.

Second, everyone I shared it with wanted to know exact details about what the story of horror was. In fact, the most intriguing aspect of the story for everyone seemed to be the level of suspense and horror it shows. Like horror films, the story awakened a primal thirst for violence and chaos in the people hearing it. Well, that’s one theory anyway.

My brother thought it was a cautionary tale, like a didactic poem from the 19th century, warning against the dangers of social media and hacking. My friends were intrigued by the ending, spending quite a while trying to come up with an explanation for who or what Jump was, and whether the ending was an elaborate hoax, a government trap, or what really happened.

I also discovered upon telling this by heart, that it was far too wordy to remember everything(I’d written it down first before memorizing it), and that it changed quite a bit in my verbal retelling-originally, Jump was the innocent party, not the hacker. Also, my listeners suggested additions and subtractions(there were two other characters originally, and Armageddon worked for the FBI). Also, as you may have noticed, mirror inconsistencies in the continuity of the narrative showed up as I told it(nobody left the internet after Jump won). I left them in for authenticity’s sake.

In the verbal retelling, I found hidden depths to both versions of the story. By retelling it both in person and online, I found myself thinking about the differences between oral and written stories once again, and the blurring  of the lines between the two due to the internet. After all, as Jump said, social media gives us a far greater opportunity to circulate stories, and makes it all but impossible to call those stories back once they’re out there.

Works Cited:

King, Stephen. “Why We Crave Horror Movies.” American Culture and the Media. (1981): 504-508. Web. May 29, 2014.

“Pandora’s Box.” Myths and Legends. E2BN, 2006. Web. May 29, 2014.

 

8 Thoughts.

  1. Breanna,
    I liked how you tied orality, writing and storytelling to the internet. There is the saying that once its on the internet, its on the internet forever – and I think this is exactly what King is telling us with the witch story.

    I wanted to let you know that there are gender neutral pronouns to use in the place(s) of he/she/her/him/his/hers…. “Ze” is one such term and it is used as a 2nd and 3rd person pronoun. Ze sounds a lot like “he” and “she”, but also reflects the German word “Sie” (also pronounced Ze) which is a genderless proper term (which would be used for people of authority/strangers). “Zir” is the 2nd and 3rd person possessive pronoun. Meanwhile, “one” and “I” is used for the first person pronoun. There are LOTS of other gender neutral pronounds (http://genderneutralpronoun.wordpress.com/) but in my experience working with the transgender community, I have found that “Ze/Zir” is the most prevalent, widespread and accepted.

    • ^ Krystle, you beat me to it! Gender-neutral pronouns are slowwwly starting to gain traction in the mainstream community; it’s always nice to popularise their use.

      Breanna, this is a great post. It reminded me of when Beyoncé’s publicist wanted to have unflattering pictures of her Superbowl performance “removed from the internet” and the whole internet cackled. (http://gawker.com/5982628/beyonces-publicist-asks-internet-to-remove-unflattering-beyonce-photos-internet-turns-unflattering-beyonce-photos-into-a-meme)

      I love how you depicted the potential of the internet for bringing people together who would never normally correspond with one another in a way that allows each person to be anonymous and somewhat mysterious. Their identities are so minutely constructed, composed solely out of their likes and interests and the stories that they tell – there is no opportunity to form an opinion of them based on anything that they themselves have not consciously presented.

      I’m also really interested in the way your story was received by different groups. It’s interesting that some people want to ‘solve’ the story – “What was the story that Jump told?” (it reminds me of Tenacious D’s ‘Tribute’ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Jvgbe9Kx0U) – or find a moral in it, and some are content to muse on the implications of the circumstances of the story. Oral storytelling is such a wonderful, tricky medium, and it shifts so much with each telling. I love how you have managed to demonstrate the capacity of the internet to recall the implications of orality, anchoring your words in an old story told by another person, but bringing the story into the present so that it is relatable to many people’s lived experiences today.

      • Hey Jess,
        Glad you liked it ; ) Thanks for the links, I really liked the video-I’m of the opinion that the story Jump told was probably a lot darker, almost an act of cyber terrorism, but this was a very interesting take on what a parody of the story might be.
        I found it interesting that you picked up on construction of identities as an element of the story that stuck with you. I only put that part in there as a whim, after someone I retold it to mentioned that the characters usernames might be interesting to flesh out a little-conveying the anonymity of the internet was unintentional, but served to further the ending of the story, when I twisted Jump to being the mysterious one.
        I found while writing and retelling this that the story details and even the plot changed quite a lot, just not the core moral, and it struck me that that’s part of what’s so powerful about King’s story. It’s a bare bones tale, that is quite easy to “take” and retell with different details, almost like a template for a story, conveying a message and allowing the reader to fill in the details. In this way, perhaps King’s story itself becomes an example of the continuing power of oral storytelling, reimaging a common theme over and over, like Anglo-Saxon Bards used to do with tales like Beowulf, before they were written down.
        Thanks for the comment!
        Cheers, Breanna

    • Hey Krystle,
      Thanks for the link! I’ve actually never heard of these particular genderless pronouns before, so thank you for helping me to broaden my knowledge of communication and diversity. I was “taking” the part of King’s text where he mentioned no one knew if the witch who told the story was male or female, and attempting to give a thought provoking spin on it. Next time, I’ll definitely use the gender neutral pronouns-it’s good to know that people have actually taken the time to notice how gendered our communication tends to be-which I would argue is testified to by the fact that I’m a fairly well read University student, and I’ve never even heard anyone, especially not teachers or professors, talk about gender neutral pronouns.
      Thanks for the enlightening comment.
      Cheers, Breanna

    • Hi Krystle, thanks for your comment- I’ve never heard of these gender neutral pronouns before! Definitely something to keep in the back of my head.

  2. Hi Breanna, great story! I liked how you used the Internet as a way of retelling the story. It’s easily relatable to many people, and the take home message is even more important. Reading your story reminded me of tattoos, specifically, the Digital Tattoo (http://digitaltattoo.ubc.ca). I also came across this TED Talk by Juan Enriquez (http://www.ted.com/talks/juan_enriquez_how_to_think_about_digital_tattoos). I love the ending of it: “The interesting thing, the original thing, would be to threaten somebody with immortality. And that, of course, is what we are all now threatened with today because of electronic tattoos.”. In a sense, the immortality of electronic/digital tattoos helps me better understand the immortality of stories and the effects they can have.

    • Hi Jenny-I’d never heard of the terminology of digital tattoos before, and I found it fascinating to learn about-thank you! I found your link to the tend talk particularly insightful, as it made me think in more depth about my choice of setting for the story-I hadn’t really thought about how setting the story in the digital world would emphasize the immortality of stories in quite the level of detail you picked up on, and I found your comments helped me flesh out my ideas more. So thank you for the stimulating dialogue : )

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Spam prevention powered by Akismet