<\/p>\n
In the critical lens, I can hypothesize that Natalia may have betrayed people in her lens to be economically smart so in that sense it can be justified. However, not once in the text could I describe her as happy. Intelligent, beautiful, insightful? Perhaps, but definitely filled with melancholy in every domain of her life. Her family has set expectations for her, but her ordinary \u00a0nature suppresses her of rebellion so she leads an ordinary life. She marries Quimet, a richer lover than the last, has children with him, and maintains the textbook housewife image. She carries the weight in the cooking, cleaning, and continues sugarcoating her life with her bare minimum husband. This despondent household is shaken and challenged when the socio-economic and political setting of the novel is shifted by the Spanish War. When Quimet goes to war and eventually dies, it could be argued that Natalia is mainly devastated by the cut off of funds during the great economic fatigue of the war rather than the loss of her husband. All in all, if he contributed anything it was company, a wavering presence that she would prefer not do without.<\/p>\n
Now, to interrogate the text\u2019s title, the doves Quimet decided to father had been sabotaged by Natalia as she distracted the mother from her chicks, leaving them malnourished and dead. I would argue that this was foreshadowing for Natalia\u2019s suicide plot. Like the doves, as soon as she was uncomfortable with her situation, she decided to do away with it \u2026 permanently.<\/p>\n
In the empathetic lens, Natalia reminds me of a time in my life where I had ulcers forming in my stomach from the constant stress and anxiety I was under. Humorously enough, I was also a victim of war at the time but by all means, had no responsibilities like her during the time. Perhaps I held the same amount of emotional intelligence and spatial awareness but no children by any means. Everything she did was for survival, from the opening scene of the party. \u00a0 \u00a0 She had no excitement coming from her previous lover, so she emotionally eloped. She never argued with her husband when \u201chis leg would hurt\u201d. Until ultimately, her only way to survive was to find closure in death not only for herself but her children as well. The grocer being a saving grace and scooping her up. Suddenly, life is only slightly good enough to live again. Her personal demons and internal struggles persist but whose don\u2019t? I know the same demons that caused those ulcers still persist in me now but I know somewhere in between the lines and chapters of the novel, Natalia found someone or something that gave her hope. The children, the grocer, a third variable hiding as a purpose? We don\u2019t know but I admire Natalia for being the protagonist who selflessly gives up her happy ending for us to learn that they aren\u2019t promised.<\/p>\n
My question is:<\/p>\n
What kept Natalia afloat? <\/strong><\/p>\n Should Natalia have turned down Quimet at the party? Would it have changed anything?<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" In the critical lens, I can hypothesize that Natalia may have betrayed people in her lens to be economically smart so in that sense it can be justified. However, not once in the text could I describe her as happy. Intelligent, beautiful, insightful? Perhaps, but definitely filled with melancholy in every domain of her […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":68319,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[52,53,58,59,51,55,54,2,57,56],"class_list":["post-25","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-anxiety","tag-autopilot","tag-doves","tag-fidelity","tag-foreshadowing","tag-hyperrealism","tag-ordinary","tag-rmst-202-201","tag-rodoreda","tag-socioeconomic"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/bueno\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/bueno\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/bueno\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/bueno\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/68319"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/bueno\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/bueno\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":26,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/bueno\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25\/revisions\/26"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/bueno\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/bueno\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/bueno\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}