Monthly Archives: February 2014

Link

Residential Schools still exist in Canada and around the world. in Vancouver,for instance, there is a residential school located quite close to UBC; St. George’s is a private residential and day school for boys, a preparatory school .There are also a number of well-known and well-established residential schools in Great Britain. Princes William and Harry attended Eton College and their father Prince Charles, Gordonstoun. Stories have been written about the extreme unhappiness experienced by well-known literary figures in residential schools, but the weight of their suffering is dwarfed by the suffering of so many of the First Nations children in the 80 or so residential schools established by the Canadian government. Scott Watson in “Witnesses” quotes Geoffrey Carr as saying the Indian residential school was a “total institution” (page 6).  The total institution, the Indian Residential School, not only sought to control every aspect of a child’s life, but to do it in such a way that the child would forsake his Aboriginal culture in favor of  European culture. The children were not allowed to use their own language and were often isolated from their home communities. And- no surprise- if the schools had been generously funded and properly staffed and supervised- the program might very well have succeeded, because the children were coming into the schools from stable communities. With good treatment they might have received a beneficial education. The modern residential schools certainly have a good reputation for producing well-educated alumni. In contrast to children in the modern schools, however, the Aboriginal children were often malnourished, lived in crowded conditions, died from contagious diseases, and were severely punished. Their punishments sometimes went beyond the regular caning and strapping done in all schools at that time. This is documented at the “Speaking to Memory” display of survivors’ writings on the walls of the O’Brian Gallery Moa at the Museum of Anthropology. There have always been a few who have expressed appreciation for the residential school experience, though. Perhaps it is significant that the index for Thomas King’s informal history of aboriginals in North America, “The Inconvenient Indian,” does not contain a listing for “school” or “residential school.” What we do in the future should be the focus.

I wonder what Bill Reid’s Haida mother would have written? At the age of ten, she was sent from Skidegate Mission village in the southern part of the Haida Gwaii archipelago “as a year-round student at an Anglican residential school on the mainland where she was forbidden to speak her Haida mother tongue, and where she learned to speak English and sew. She was an English teacher before her marriage, and spoke excellent English,” as is mentioned in The Raven’s Call. She lived in Victoria for the most part and raised her son in the English-speaking culture of the city. As an adult he frequently returned  to Haida Gwaii for inspiration in his development as an artist. Some measure of his artistic success is displayed at the Museum. Perhaps something was gained from both cultures.

 

 

Issues around Missing Sarah

In Wally Oppal’s “Forsaken: The Report of the Missing Women Commission of Inquiry,” it is stated very clearly that the investigators intend “to enquire into and make finding of fact” respecting the police force investigations into the women missing from the Downtown Eastside from January 23, 1997 to Feb. 5, 2002, and in particular the decision made not to proceed with charges of assault, confinement, and attempted murder against Robert Pickton on January 27, 1998 (4). They are then prepared to recommend changes in the way  investigations should be done and coordinated between different police jurisdictions, Although they did seem to achieve their stated objectives, Ammilan quotes sources who were very disappointed with the results. Do you think this reaction is justified? Was it a failure as a quasi-judicial inquiry or not?  Chelsey mentions that “39% of the missing women were identified as having some form of indigenous heritage,” and alludes to an informative blog by Martin Lukacs mentioning that although the aboriginal population of Canada is about 4.3 % of the total population, the indigenous population in the Downtown Eastside is about 10 %.  Why would they congregate there? In his book, “The Inconvenient Indian,” Thomas King argues that “when we look at Native-non-Native relations, there is no great difference between the past and the present. While we have dispensed with guns and bugles, and while North America’s sense of its own superiority is better hidden, its disdain muted, twenty-first-century attitudes towards Native people are remarkably similar to those of previous centuries” (xv). Ashley’s description of how Kristin Gilchrist’s article compares the news coverage of Native and Non-Native women supports Kings’s view. The three Native women are mentioned in the stories 1/6 as often with fewer words and details and smaller pictures. They are less named. Do you think that “Missing Sarah,” Jiwani and Young’s report and Wally Oppal’s “Forsaken” will have some impact on Thomas King’s assessment of the contemporary attitude towards Natives? (How would the reader from GoodReads that Emily Anctil refers to assess the overall impact on the reading public of the book “Missing Sarah?) Ashley suggest other ways of influencing people for the betterment of society. And A.J. refers to “Missing Sarah” as a Memoir of Failure- a failure of systems and a failure of people. Alyssa G has an assessment of the family’s failure in Sarah’s tragedy and an excellent pictorial representation of her assessment. What do YOU think?