{"id":1985,"date":"2026-07-14T14:09:39","date_gmt":"2026-07-14T21:09:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/catherinerawn\/?page_id=1985"},"modified":"2026-07-16T12:25:29","modified_gmt":"2026-07-16T19:25:29","slug":"student-evaluations","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/catherinerawn\/teaching\/student-evaluations\/","title":{"rendered":"Student Evaluations of Teaching"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I deeply value student feedback on my teaching practice. Over the years, student feedback has <strong>helped me identify my signature strengths<\/strong>, such as <strong>enthusiasm and deep care for students and their learning<\/strong> (which students have linked to their willingness and ability to learn challenging material). While I grow and change as a human and a teacher, such consistent messaging from students has <strong>helped me discern what classroom practices might align well with <em>who I am<\/em> <\/strong>at my best, and thus help me bring out the best in students.<\/p>\n<p>Student feedback has also <strong>challenged me to look critically<\/strong> at where my courses and classroom practices might benefit from change. Suggestions for improvement, especially when framed as straight-up negative feedback, are never exactly &#8216;fun&#8217; to receive. I do my best to approach them <strong>humbly and strategically<\/strong>, searching for relatively common <strong>concerns I can actually address<\/strong> (while keeping an eye out for rare issues too). I then try to address these concerns as best I can through iterative course changes, and examine evidence of impact in subsequent years&#8217; feedback.<\/p>\n<p>What follows is a summary of my <a href=\"https:\/\/seoi.ubc.ca\/\">Student Experience of Instruction<\/a> scores, with links to blog entries discussing qualitative results and (forthcoming) priorities for change. This page was created July 2026 and builds from my previous page, <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/catherinerawn\/teaching\/assessing-teaching\/\">Teaching Evaluations<\/a>, which offers analysis from 2008-2009 through 2020-2021 academic years.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h1>A Note on Measurement<\/h1>\n<p>Students are asked to rate agreement with six &#8220;University Module Item&#8221; (UMI) questions on a 5 point scale, 5= strongly agree, 4 = agree, 3 = neutral, 2 = disagree, 1 = strongly disagree. Since W2021, these items have been phrased as follows:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 15px;\">UMI 1. Throughout the term, the instructor explained course requirements so it was clear to me what I was expected to learn.<\/span><\/li>\n<li>UMI 2. The instructor conducted this course in such a way that I was motivated to learn.<\/li>\n<li>UMI 3. The presented the course material in a way that I could understand.<\/li>\n<li>UMI 4. Considering the type of class (e.g., large lecture, seminar, studio), the instructor provided useful feedback that helped me understand how my learning progressed during this course.<\/li>\n<li>UMI 5. The instructor showed genuine interest in supporting my learning throughout this course.<\/li>\n<li>UMI 6. Overall, I learned a great deal from this instructor.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>We are provided with the following aggregate data for these items: response rate, frequency distribution, interpolated median, percent favourable, and dispersion index. For details, please see <a href=\"https:\/\/seoi.ubc.ca\/metrics\/\">Metrics | Student Experience of Instruction<\/a>. There are 12 additional items, but for brevity I focus only on the UMIs.<\/p>\n<p>Students are then asked to respond to the following <strong>open-ended questions\/statements:<\/strong> (1) <em>Do you have any suggestions for what the instructor could have done differently to further support your learning? <\/em>(2) <em>Please identify what you consider to be the strengths of this course. <\/em>(3) <em>Please provide suggestions on how this course might be improved. <\/em>(4) <em>Please add any comments or feedback that will help your instructor to improve this course. <\/em>(5) <em>*Please explain in a few sentences why you wish to nominate your instructor for a teaching award.<\/em> *This last question was added by the Psychology Department and, I believe, only appears for students who indicated they wish to nominate the instructor.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15px; font-weight: 300;\">Across these questions, I tend to receive about 6-8 pages of text responses <\/span><span style=\"font-size: 15px; font-weight: 300;\">(in size 8.5 font) per section of course I teach, so about 12-16 pages per course per year. Students are unidentifiable, and it is impossible to follow one student&#8217;s train of thought across questions (i.e., if they say &#8220;see earlier answer&#8221; I cannot know which answer it is referring to). Please see <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/catherinerawn\/2026\/07\/15\/approach-to-analyzing-qualitative-student-evals-data-2026\/\">Approach to Analyzing Qualitative Student Evals Data 2026 <\/a>for how I am experimenting with using LLM (Microsoft Copilot) to help me analyze these data.<\/span><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h1>PSYC_V 217 Research Methods<\/h1>\n<p>Since 2010 I have regularly taught students in this course at 9am and 10am on MWF in Term 1. This graph presents UMI interpolated medians starting from W2021, when we were back for in person classes but masking (a stressful combination of relief + anxiety). I didn&#8217;t teach in W2022 (course releases then medical leave) or W2025 (sabbatical). When I returned for W2023 I felt compelled to overhaul this longstanding course, which I taught in a similar style in W2024 (see my poster for <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/catherinerawn\/2024\/05\/30\/stlhe-2024\/\">STLHE 2024<\/a> for some rationale for the change; all syllabi are available on my <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/catherinerawn\/teaching\/courses\/\">Courses<\/a> page).<\/p>\n<p>Please see\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/catherinerawn\/2026\/07\/15\/learning-from-my-previous-students-psyc_v-217-research-methods\/\">Learning from my previous Students PSYC_V 217 Research Methods<\/a> for analysis of quantitative and qualitative data. The emphasis is on W2024 data as I prepare for W2026.<\/p>\n<p>Please see <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/catherinerawn\/2026\/07\/16\/evaluating-research-methods-course-redesign\/\">Evaluating Research Methods Course Redesign: Student Feedback<\/a> for examining impacts of my W2023-W2024 course renewal, in contrast with W2021.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/catherinerawn\/files\/2026\/07\/SEoT-PSYC-217-2021W-to-2024W-1.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-1992 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/catherinerawn\/files\/2026\/07\/SEoT-PSYC-217-2021W-to-2024W-1-300x204.jpg\" alt=\"Bar graph showing UMI interpolated medians of all six PSYC 217 sections taught since 2021.\" width=\"300\" height=\"204\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/catherinerawn\/files\/2026\/07\/SEoT-PSYC-217-2021W-to-2024W-1-300x204.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/catherinerawn\/files\/2026\/07\/SEoT-PSYC-217-2021W-to-2024W-1-768x522.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/catherinerawn\/files\/2026\/07\/SEoT-PSYC-217-2021W-to-2024W-1.jpg 1022w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h1>PSYC_V 218 Analysis of Behavioural Data<\/h1>\n<p><em>Coming soon!<\/em><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I deeply value student feedback on my teaching practice. Over the years, student feedback has helped me identify my signature strengths, such as enthusiasm and deep care for students and their learning (which students have linked to their willingness and <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/catherinerawn\/teaching\/student-evaluations\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">  Student Evaluations of Teaching<\/span><span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":679,"featured_media":0,"parent":57,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1985","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/catherinerawn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1985","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/catherinerawn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/catherinerawn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/catherinerawn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/679"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/catherinerawn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1985"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/catherinerawn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1985\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2028,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/catherinerawn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1985\/revisions\/2028"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/catherinerawn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/57"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/catherinerawn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1985"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}