LIBE 467 63C
Assignment 1: Evaluation of a Reference Work
Catherine Sharpe
Rubric for assessing a Reference Resource:
| Reference Work | Not Meeting | Meeting | Exceeding |
| Relevancy | Not many visuals or visuals are unappealing for audience.
Authors and publishers with little or no authority/no author found. |
Visuals further content understanding and engage reader.
Authors and publishers with good authority.
|
Visuals are highly engaging and age appropriate and strongly connect to content.
Authors and publishers with excellent authority. |
| Purpose | Expensive and may need to be replaced frequently.
Difficult to navigate – organization is illogical. Information is presented with bias or connected to commercial agencies. Resource is created to sell or sway reader’s opinion. |
Cost effective.
Easily navigated-table of contents/index/ glossary are available. Minimal level of bias. Information of presented with no intention to sell or sway reader’s opinion. Resource is created for educational purposes with possible connection to commercial agency. |
Little or no cost to the library.
Logical sequence Obvious and logical navigation available – table of contents/index/glossary simple to follow. No level of bias. Information is presented in a neutral way. Resource is created for educational purposes only. |
| Currency | 10 years +.
Little of no updates available. Little or no search features. Information is out-of-date. |
5-10 years old.
Updated yearly. Basic search features. |
Less than 5 years old or is continuously updated.
Link maintenance Basic and advanced search features. |
| Curricular Connection | Materials meet some of the curriculum.
Content is presented in singular format, reading level and student needs. Does not reflect student interests and cultural background of student population |
Materials meet most of the curricular needs.
Content is presented in a few formats, languages and reading levels. Meets from variance of student needs. Somewhat reflects student interests and cultural background of student population |
Materials meet all of the curricular needs.
Content presented in different formats, languages and reading levels. Meets diverse student needs. Strongly reflects student interests and cultural background of student population. |
| Use of Lib. Space | Stored on high shelf out of reach for most patrons.
Occupies an entire shelf or is difficult to fit on shelf. Meets the needs of a few learners. Complex organization that is difficult to follow. |
Accessible for all patrons most of the time.
Fits easily on one shelf or does not take up any shelf space (digital). Meets the needs of most learners. Organization can be followed with some direction. |
Easily accessible for all patron use.
Takes up little or no space in the library. Meet the needs of diverse learners. Organization is user-friendly. How to use the materials is explained clearly. |
Reference Resource to be replaced:
Fick, S. (2004). The Canadian atlas. Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre.
| Reference Work | Not Meeting | Meeting | Exceeding |
| Relevancy | Not many visuals or visuals are unappealing for audience.
Authors and publishers with little or no authority/no author found. |
Visuals further content understanding and engage reader.
Authors and publishers with good authority.
|
Visuals are highly engaging and age appropriate and strongly connect to content.
Authors and publishers with excellent authority. |
| Purpose | Expensive and may need to be replaced frequently.
Difficult to navigate – organization is illogical. Information is presented with bias or connected to commercial agencies. Resource is created to sell or sway reader’s opinion. |
Cost effective.
Easily navigated-table of contents/index/ glossary available. Minimal level of bias. Information of presented with no intention to sell or sway reader’s opinion. Resource is created for educational purposes with possible connection to commercial agency. |
Little or no cost to the library.
Logical sequence Obvious and logical navigation available – table of contents/index/glossary simple to follow. No level of bias. Information is presented in a neutral way. Resource is created for educational purposes only. |
| Currency | 10 years +.
Little of no updates available. Little or no search features. Information is out-of-date. |
5-10 years old.
Updated yearly. Basic search features. |
Less than 5 years old or is continuously updated.
Link maintenance Basic and advanced search features. |
| Curricular Connection | Materials meet some of the curriculum.
Content is presented in singular format, reading level and student needs. Does not reflect student interests and cultural background of student population. |
Materials meet most of the curricular needs.
Content is presented in a few formats, languages and reading levels. Meets some variance of student needs. Somewhat reflects student interests and cultural background of student population. |
Materials meet all of the curricular needs.
Content presented in different formats, languages and reading levels. Meets diverse student needs. Strongly reflects student interests and cultural background of student population. |
| Use of Lib. Space | Stored on high shelf out of reach for most patrons.
Occupies an entire shelf or is difficult to fit on shelf. Meets the needs of a few learners. Complex organization that is difficult to follow. |
Accessible for all patrons most of the time.
Fits easily on one shelf or does not take up any shelf space (digital). Meets the needs of most learners. Organization can be followed with some direction. |
Easily accessible for all patron use.
Takes up little or no space in the library. Meet the needs of diverse learners. Organization is user-friendly. How to use the materials is explained clearly. |
Relevancy: Although this resource has very well-known affiliation of “Reader’s Digest” and “Canadian Geographic”, the publisher and author are lesser known. As well, there are many colour visuals that strongly connect to the content; however, since the date of publication is 2004, it is now 16 years old and the visuals are dated and therefore unappealing to current students.
Purpose: In 2004, this resource cost $69.95, which, on a library budget is quite expensive and since this is a print resource about Canada, the content changes rapidly so if the library wants to supply reference resources with current content, the resource would need to be replaced at least every 5 years. There is a table of contents, a map index, and a thematic subject index that make it easy to navigate the contents but a bit complex for younger users. There is no glossary present so it would indicate that the resource is intended for users who already understand the vocabulary in the resource. The resource is affiliated with a commercial agency, “Reader’s Digest”, but the information is presented for educational purposes without bias and without any intention to sell or sway the reader. This resource is a Canadian atlas, so the purpose is singular.
Currency: This resource was published in 2004, making it 16 years old. It is a print resource; therefore, the search features are finite, and it cannot be updated automatically so much of the content is out-of-date.
Curricular connection: The contents of this resource focus on Canadian maps and facts about Canadian geography, environment and peoples. The contents may still meet some of the curricular needs, but it is difficult for students to know what information is still accurate, so it makes the resource unusable. As well, the information is presented with the intention for higher level readers only, with a lot of words in a small font. The contents are Canadian so it is well-suited to meet the interests and cultural background of most students in a Canadian Elementary school.
Use of library space: This is a very large, heavy book with the spine measuring 37 cm tall, the covers measuring 45 cm diagonally, and weighing 4 lbs. Therefore, it is difficult to fit on a regular shelf, so it was stored on a high shelf out of reach for most patrons. The size and storage for this resource makes it challenging for most patrons to use.
In conclusion, this resource will be deselected from the Library Learning Commons because it is NOT MEETING the criteria for a Reference Resource.
New Reference Resource:
Home Smithsonian Institute. (2020). Retrieved 6 February 2020, from https://www.si.edu/
Search | Everything | Smithsonian Learning Lab. (2020). Retrieved 6 February 2020, from https://learninglab.si.edu/
| Reference Work | Not Meeting | Meeting | Exceeding |
| Relevancy | Not many visuals or visuals are unappealing for audience.
Authors and publishers with little or no authority/no author found. |
Visuals further content understanding and engage reader.
Authors and publishers with good authority.
|
Visuals are highly engaging and age appropriate and strongly connect to content.
Authors and publishers with excellent authority. |
| Purpose | Expensive and may need to be replaced frequently.
Difficult to navigate – organization is illogical. Information is presented with bias or connected to commercial agencies. Resource is created to sell or sway reader’s opinion. |
Cost effective.
Easily navigated-table of contents/index/ glossary are available. Minimal level of bias. Information of presented with no intention to sell or sway reader’s opinion. Resource is created for educational purposes with possible connection to commercial agency. |
Little or no cost to the library.
Logical sequence Obvious and logical navigation available – table of contents/index/glossary simple to follow. No level of bias. Information is presented in a neutral way. Resource is created for educational purposes only. |
| Currency | 10 years +.
Little of no updates available. Little or no search features. Information is out-of-date. |
5-10 years old.
Updated yearly. Basic search features. |
Less than 5 years old or is continuously updated.
Link maintenance Basic and advanced search features. |
| Curricular Connection | Materials meet some of the curriculum.
Content is presented in singular format, reading level and student needs. Does not reflect student interests and cultural background of student population |
Materials meet most of the curricular needs.
Content is presented in a few formats, languages and reading levels. Meets from variance of student needs. Somewhat reflects student interests and cultural background of student population |
Materials meet all of the curricular needs.
Content presented in different formats, languages and reading levels. Meets diverse student needs. Strongly reflects student interests and cultural background of student population. |
| Use of Lib. Space | Stored on high shelf out of reach for most patrons.
Occupies an entire shelf or is difficult to fit on shelf. Meets the needs of a few learners. Complex organization that is difficult to follow. |
Accessible for all patrons most of the time.
Fits easily on one shelf or does not take up any shelf space (digital). Meets the needs of most learners. Organization can be followed with some direction. |
Easily accessible for all patron use.
Takes up little or no space in the library. Meet the needs of diverse learners. Organization is user-friendly. How to use the materials is explained clearly. |
Relevancy: This resource has a very well-known Smithsonian affiliation and therefore has good authority so all patrons can trust the content provided through any links on the website. On every page of the website, there are visuals that appeal to patrons of varying interests.
Purpose: Si.edu is a free resource with no advertising popups. The information is presented without bias and is for educational purposes only. From the homepage, there is an easy to use navigation bar with many links to suit the needs of a wide variety of patrons. For example, on the homepage, one link on the navigation bar is “Learn and Explore” which has resources “For Educators”, “For Kids”, “For Researchers” and “Collections”. In addition to offering information about various world locations, their environments and peoples, this site supplies information on almost every topic one can think of. So, this site can be used for multiple purposes which makes it extremely cost effective.
Currency: As a web resource, it is continuously updated and therefore the content is always current. Every link works, contains current content and each connects to educational contents always within the Smithsonian Institute website.
Curricular connection: This site meets all of the curricular content and more. It meets a variety of diverse patron needs by offering many different links through the homepage. If a student patron clicks on the “For Kids” link, it offers a selection of resources like games that reinforce a variety of content reflecting curriculum. Links can be found for all ability levels, interests and cultural connections. Under the “For Educators” link there is another link to “Learning Labs” where patrons can search almost any curricular topic, create a log-in and save links to favorite resources within the Learning Labs.
Use of library space: As a website, it takes up no extra space in the library and is easily accessible for all patron use. The website is well-organized and clearly explains how to use the various resources. The website offers content in different views that patrons can choose to meet their learning needs.
In conclusion, Si.edu, Smithsonian Institute website, will be selected as a new resource for the Library Learning Commons because it is EXCEEDING the criteria for a Reference Resource.
References:
Asselin, M., Branch, J., & Oberg, D., (Eds). (2003). Achieving information literacy: Standards for school library programs in Canada. Ottawa, ON: Canadian School Library Association & The Association for Teacher-Librarianship in Canada (pp. 32-33).
Fick, S. (2004). The Canadian atlas. Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre.
Home Smithsonian Institute. (2020). Retrieved 6 February 2020, from https://www.si.edu/
Riedling, A. (2013). Reference skills for the school library media specialist: Tools and tips, (Third Ed.). Santa Barbara, CA.: Linworth, an Imprint of ABC-CLIO, LLC (pp.22-23).
Search | Everything | Smithsonian Learning Lab. (2020). Retrieved 6 February 2020, from https://learninglab.si.edu/search?st=energy&st_op=and&item_type=collections
The Sage Colleges. (2020). Evaluating Sources: TRAP. Retrieved 6 February 2020, from Libraries.sage.edu.
I like that you’ve replaced what is typically a print resource with an electronic one from a respected authority – The Smithsonian. I agree with your rationale that 2004 is just too outdated for Canadian map content, and that a small font and lack of glossary might make it more challenging for some students to access the information easily. This is similar to the resource I replaced on Indigenous peoples – the original resource had small font and lacked interest in terms of current learning styles.
What a great relief to find a resource online, for FREE, that does not have any ads. I do find that challenging, as even many news sites that are considered reliable and appropriate for current events research include many ads and pop-ups. In fact, have you noticed many news sources ask you to stop your pop-up blocker, unless you want to sign up or pay for the news source?
Thanks for finding a good resource that is easily accessible to all.
Hi Sophie,
That is an interesting fact about the news sources, that seems so wrong! Can’t students go anywhere without being bombarded with advertising?! I’m glad you find the resource useful. I’m excited to try it out at school.