Addressing Food Security within the Asia Pacific region

This blog will look at key issues addressing food security concerns. I will share and analyze global and regional issues related to Asia as a whole, specifically this blog will also touch on the key issues on South East Asia, China and India and The rise of the east and the current political discourses that is currently playing out in Asia. Understanding the context of structural matrixes and policy making in the Asian context will enable us to critically pursue issues related to food sovereignty and food security in Asia. The recent political and economical reforms by many asian economies plays a pivotal role for us to reflect upon Asia’s future food policies and security issues.

My top 5 food rules that defines Good Food

Many of us would always think that good food is all about the calories, the amount of fat, the amount of sugar. But really Good Food could be define in so many ways, this blog post is about how I define Good Food, in which I compared my personal experience back in Asia and Canada, my knowledge as an economist and food scientist and what my perception and priorities are when I need to choose a Good Food. Read this, and let me know what is Good Food for you.

Accessibility is one food rule that is very important to me. This rule might not constitute to an eating habit or a health claim, however in my opinion, it is how one defines the term ‘accessibility’. Pretty et al. (2012) reiterated about the ‘locus of power’ of corporate food retailer within the Food Supply Chains (FSC), these food retailers are the main food source to three-fourths of the consumers from industrialized economies. Similarly, having lived all my life in urban areas, Singapore and Vancouver, I would certainly associate myself with these consumers. Accessibility thus implies the basic medium of food source, which in my context is a food retailer like a super market, a local grocery store, or a food service establishment. It also suggests the accessibility of ‘good food’, which takes on the criterion of nutrition moderation, affordable, and environmental friendly as elaborated in my previous essay.

Accessibility and Health

Accessibility correlates to good health; the choices I make everyday are constantly influenced on what is available, and where I am located. The Provincial Health Service Authority (2008) states, “Ensuring access to fresh, nutritious food is critical for maintaining a healthy population.” This statement resonates my everyday consumption choices. Why? In Asia a midnight snack would likely consist of an Asian staple like noodles or kebabs, however in Vancouver my convenient choice is to call Dominos and binge on pizza or hot wings. Another clear sign of the correlation would be the increase consumption of organic vegetables in my diet during this year due to me purchasing part of my groceries from the UBC Farm, built upon the incentive that they were selling on campus.

Frasco (2006) advocated and celebrated the invention of white bread, she emphasized on the accessibility of primary staples made available by the industrial revolution. Similarly her speech made it palpable on the consequence and impact of technology and how it allowed greater accessibility of ‘good food’. McCullum (2005) mentioned the need to nurture and foster community food security through a three-stage approach. This approach incorporates ‘accessibility’ as one of its priorities through the implementation process put forth as part of the proposal. One of such is to “maximize access to existing programs to food and nutrition programs”.

Do you eat a certain way because you think it is more environmentally friendly?

Making a decision on what to purchase and what to consume is hard, but my education in Canada has influenced my eating habits, eating locally and sustainably has become my core criterions for choosing what to consume for a meal. Browsing through baskets of fruits and vegetable in the local grocery store, I look out for labels or captions such as ‘BC grown’ or ‘organic’ logos. Connell et al. (2008) found ‘locally produced’ foods to be one of the important factors among consumer buying attitudes of farmers’ market shoppers. Similarly, as a patron of the UBC Farm market, it has made me considered such factors as importance and environmentally friendly. Godfray et al. (2010) suggested that one of the solution of global food security and the sustainability of our food system is to reduce food waste. This study presented how transport and processing constituted to a large part of food wastage. Thus locally produced food reduces the quantity of food waste substantially. Pretty et al. (2010) mentioned how the Food Supply Chain (FSC) should ‘better demonstrate the link between diet, environmental, and social impacts, thereby encouraging greater responsibility and behavioral change in the development of more sustainable FSC. Such evidence further substantiates my choices of procuring local organic produces as an advocate for social and behavioral changes to support the growth of sustainable food supply chains.

References

Pretty, J., Sutherland, W. J., Ashby, J., Auburn, J., Baulcombe, D., Bell, M., . . . Pilgrim, S. (2010). The top 100 questions of importance to the future of global agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 8(4), 219-236. Retrieved fromhttp://ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/859121960?accountid=14656

Connell, D. J., Smithers, J., & Joseph, A. (2008). Farmers’ markets and the “good food” value chain: a preliminary study. Local Environment, 13(3), 169-185. doi:10.1080/13549830701669096

Provincial Health Services Authority. (2008). A seat at the table: Resource guide for local           governments to promote food secure communities.  Retrieved from https://      www.vista.ubc.ca/webct/urw/tp8616694010261.lc8616662988261//RelativeResourceManager?contentID=8628415313191

McCullum, C., Desjardins, E., Kraak, V., Ladipo, P., Costello, H. (2005). Evidence-based       strategies to build community food security. Journal of The American Dietetic      Association. 2, 278-283.

Godfray H. J., Charles Beddington R., John Crute R., Ian Lawrence Haddad, David Lawrence, James F. Muir, Jules Pretty, Sherman Robinson, Sandy M. Thomas, and Camilla Toulmin (2010) Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People. Published online 28 January 2010 [DOI:10.1126/science.1185383]

Franco, L. (2009). Louis franco on feeding the world [Web]. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ted.com/talks/lang/en/louise_fresco_on_feeding_the_whole_world.html

Super Size Portion Size…Really

During the reading break this year, I set out on my very first trip to the United States of America, Seattle, during which I experience the ‘American’ portion size of food, indeed I am amaze with the huge consumption and availability of carbonated soft drinks as part of the north American diet, and the enormous portion size when you order food. The entrenched fast food culture within the North American Society is distinct. This experience set me to reflect upon Marion Nestle’s (2011) speech, her condemnation of the pervasive marketing of processed and unhealthy foods, and her disdain towards the fast food culture, and her emphasis of education and the looming obesity problems. Furthermore, it also enabled me to contrast American’s ‘over consumption’ to Asia where malnutrition is still a vital issue for many Asian countries.

Still I disapprove of how food is being marketed and sold in North America, I believe that there is no need for what Americans might call the ‘super-size’ portion size. What it portrays is just the sharp polarity of poverty and wealth between the developed economies and developing world. A probable solution is education, the American dietetic solution should emphasize on nation-wide education in choosing and consuming right, yet the most important issue is to regulate marketing of processed food products and fast food. Over-sized portion size should not be made available to consumers, in addition proper recommendation of how many serving of this food product should be eaten per day should also be made mandatory on all food products.

Check out this video below:

MArion Nestle, Nobel Conference on What is Good Food

References

Connell, D. J., Smithers, J., & Joseph, A. (2008). Farmers’ markets and the “good food” value chain: a preliminary study. Local Environment, 13(3), 169-185. doi:10.1080/13549830701669096

Marion, N. (2010). Food politics, personal responsibility vs social responsbility [Web]. Retrieved from https://gustavus.edu/events/nobelconference/2010/archive.php

Godfray H. J., Charles Beddington R., John Crute R., Ian Lawrence Haddad, David Lawrence, James F. Muir, Jules Pretty, Sherman Robinson, Sandy M. Thomas, and Camilla Toulmin (2010) Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People. Published online 28 January 2010 [DOI:10.1126/science.1185383]

Sustainable Food Systems

Sustainability is now the hot topic in the academic world. But really there is more than just recycling, reusing and reducing waste, it is all about the social ethos you live in, your ability to ‘walk the talk’. This entails more than just making grabbing that bottle of coke bottle you just had and recycling it, one needs to understand why, how sustainability could be entrenched within your values and beliefs. Our sources and choices of food impacts our surrounding, the consequence of our food waste might just be destroying the ecology of our . Let us fathom upon our food system, how do we embrace a more sustainable food system.

On a personal level, I believe that sustainable food systems are born out of a culture of ‘respect’, respect for each other (us), respect for the land and the respect for our future generations (our children and descendants). A food system that yields good food has to be one that its consumers recognize that we are embedded as part of this food system, and that our actions and choices impacts and affects subsequent generations environmentally, culturally, socially. Man has overtime disconnected himself from the very earth that gave it food and energy; we need to recognize that life will only sustain humanity only if earth continues to bestow its abundance of produces. Godfray et al. (2010) on solving the problem of feeding 9 billion people conclude, “The goals is no longer simply to maximize productivity, but to optimize across a far more complex landscape of production, environmental, and social justice outcomes”. We as citizens of the world thus needs to be assertive on demanding and sourcing our food from more sustainable origins, such as fair trade labeling and supporting local farm coops and local food markets.

Connecting Farms to Consumers

I wanted to share some awesome sustainable marketing campaigns that connects consumers to sustainable food sources. One of which is the UBC Farm, but interestingly I wanted to discuss UC Santa Cruz outreach activities that connects daily consumers, students, faculty members to its local food system.

UC Santa Cruz (UCSC) serves as an ideal reference institution for the University of British Columbia (UBC) in its quest for a sustainable, local food system. Both institutes share a similar context of having an organic farm located on campus facilitating the incorporation local organic food into their campus food systems.  UCSC  has established itself as “a national model for a growing movement called ‘farm-to-college’” (The Cultivar, 2006).  The farm-to-college movement “help farmers get more of the food dollar, benefit local economies, and give students access to locally produced, fresh food” (The Cultivar, 2006).  All five on campus student dining facilities at UCSC are now offering fresh and local produce every day of the week as a result of the relationship formed between local farms and the educational institute.

Critical to the success of UCSC’s food movement was the support and demand from students for local, organic food, sustainable food system.  The Food Systems Working Group (FSWG) comprised of students, faculty, staff, and community representatives, with the common goal for increasing food security and sustainability, came together to determine how this could best be accomplished. The education of students was one of two primary strategies the FSWG implemented to ensure their food movement’s ongoing success.  These outreach activities introduced at UCSC included (The Cultivar, 2006):

  • local organic College Night dinners,
  • facilitating the relationships between dining services staff and local farmers,
  • organizing regional farm tours for students and organic taste tests at the college,
  • bringing in student leaders from other campuses and guest speakers to advocate sustainable food system resource exchange and food sovereignty.

The FSWG emphasizes ongoing outreach and student education to maintain participation and support from both the students and the dining services for sustainable food.  The success of farm-to-college food movement at UCSC has served as a springboard for a statewide movement.   In October 2004 students launched UC Sustainable Foods Campaign of the California Student Sustainability Coalition to focus on developing all components of sustainable campus food systems.  However, the progress at UCSC is not finished, as the FSWG continues to strive for increased local, fresh, and sustainable food options available on campus.

Through our investigation into developing local food systems across North America, the most common barrier to success and the most challenging task was consumer education. Within the university context, this means promoting student and faculty awareness of the issues surrounding local food. The University of California, Berkley has had many successes in its journey to a more sustainable and locally reliant food shed through campus education campaigns.

UC Berkeley participates in three major arenas of local food education.  The first is a student group that visits farmers’ markets on weekends to buy locally sourced food and then sells that food on campus during the week at cost to other students. This brings the market to campus and creates exposure for local food and an opportunity to engage a wider range of students in the experience of eating locally. Berkeley also screens films that promote and educate on the local food movement. One such film that was viewed on campus recently called “FRESH” tells the story of the farmers, thinkers, and business people who have been driving the local food movement and why. Finally, media outreach is a very important part of sparking the interest in students and staff that may create a curiosity in local food. The different organizations at UC Berkley have been very visible in various media outlets in the area and have been successful in promoting their initiatives.

References

The Cultivar (2006). UC Santa Cruz makes the farm-to-college connection.  The Center for Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems. 24, 1-19.

Food Safety in China

Having had Food Science background and being trained adequately regarding Quality Assurance and Quality control  , it makes me wonder if the policy makers China’s food industry recognizes the huge responsibility they have with regards to China’s Food Security. Recently I have read an article on the Economist, the issue titled ” Food Safety in China”. Now you may be thinking what would food safety had to do with Food security? Well my perspective is this, Food security surely does encompass the quantitative aspect of it – the consumer purchasing power, the food to income ratio, and the needed amount of rice, staples and meat to prevent hunger and poverty related to malnutrition. But surely though I personally feel that food security encompass another aspect which is more qualitative – that is it is important that consumers within emerging markets like china have the accessibility to safe and nutritious food products. The Walmart issue is one of many cases that of course considering the magnitude of the tainted milk scandal that captured world media is one of many that affirms the core problem of the food system in China.

Below is an excerpt directly from the economist, taken from http://www.economist.com/node/21534812, latest issue of the economist

WALMART, an American supermarket chain, has been having a tough time recently in China, one of its fastest growing markets. On October 25th it reopened 13 stores in the south-western region of Chongqing which were closed for two weeks as punishment for mislabelling a pork product. Chinese officials have recently had a pang of food-safety conscience, and a big foreign firm has offered an easy target.

Food-related scandals, often exacerbated by official negligence or corruption, can cause major political embarrassment in China. In the approach to the Olympic games in Beijing in August 2008, the leadership’s efforts to create an image of a safe and hygienic China led to the suppression of news about a widespread contamination of milk products with melamine, a chemical that can be toxic. By the time the central government admitted the problem in September that year, tens of thousands of babies had been affected and several had died.

Public anger over the incident hastened the passing of a food-safety law in 2009 which was intended to tighten standards, improve supervision and impose tougher penalties on violators. It appears to have done no more to alleviate public anxiety than did the execution in 2007 of a former head of the State Food and Drug Administration for taking bribes to certify products as safe. Toxic foodstuffs continue to be sold. This year the authorities announced a renewed campaign against the use of the steroid clenbuterol after it was discovered in pork products in March. The chemical can make meat leaner, but can also be the cause of heart palpitations, diarrhoea and muscle tremors.

By comparison, Walmart’s offence in Chongqing was minor. Officials said it had mislabelled ordinary pork and sold it as a pricier organic product. But in addition to closing its stores, the company was fined more than $575,000. Two Walmart employees were arrested and another 25 are being investigated. The company’s head in China and a senior vice-president resigned (though Walmart denies any link). A 60-member team was sent to Chongqing to investigate, and its Asia chief executive apologised to the mayor.

With more than 350 stores in the country and nearly 100,000 employees (as well as tough Chinese competitors), Walmart offers a tempting target to officials. It has been punished 21 times in Chongqing since 2006 for a variety of wrongdoings, ranging from false advertising to selling out-of-date food. But Caixin, a Chinese magazine, reported on its website that the latest sanctions against Walmart had been the toughest imposed by the Chongqing authorities on any retailer in recent years. It said aspects of the government’s treatment of Walmart were “worryingly” out of keeping with the spirit of the law, not least the principle that punishment should fit the crime.

Some commentators in China have pointed out that Chongqing has a special interest in appearing tough on such issues. Its party chief, Bo Xilai, has been waging a high-profile (critics say ruthless) campaign against organised crime in the region. Mr Bo has also been promoting communist values of egalitarianism, thrift and honesty (his son’s schooling: Harrow and Oxford). His ardently nationalist supporters cheered the crackdown on Walmart. They hope Mr Bo will take a top position in Beijing during a sweeping shuffle of the Chinese leadership late next year. A commentary on Utopia, a Chinese website that champions Mr Bo, said the Walmart case had demonstrated Chongqing’s “resolute attitude” towards food safety and its determination that every violation should be punished severely.

It is unlikely that many Chinese are similarly convinced. The Walmart case followed close on the heels of another food scandal that seems to shock the public far more: the production and extensive use of “gutter oil”, mainly in restaurants. The term refers to recycled cooking oil, which is often retrieved from drains where it is dumped by restaurants after use. Floating to the top, it is scooped up and recycled, using chemicals to disguise the smell. Such oil can contain carcinogens and toxic mould. Even Xinhua, the government’s news agency, called gutter oil “the most nerve-jittery problem of late” concerning food safety, and one that showed “a really nasty reality of Chinese food today”.

Last month the police said they had arrested 32 people for producing the oil and had seized 90 tonnes of it in 14 provinces. Cynicism is widespread, even in the state-controlled media which reported that an estimated 2m tonnes of the slop are consumed annually in the country by unwitting diners. This is said to be equivalent to about one-tenth of the total used by restaurants. The mysterious death last month of Li Xiang, a reporter investigating the phenomenon, fuelled suspicions among Chinese internet users of an attempt by criminals to silence him.

The government is nervous of the public’s deep mistrust of its ability to supervise the food market (even officials admit that detecting gutter oil can be tricky). On October 19th the prime minister, Wen Jiabao, chaired a cabinet meeting that acknowledged, according to a government release, “great public dissatisfaction” with a lack of honesty in commercial dealings and called for stepped-up efforts to teach people sincerity. Mr Wen has an uphill task in his remaining 17 months at the helm.