In my daily coaching practice, I try to apply a coaching style the enhances implicit learning to the athletes.
Some of the challenges I encounter are that often athletes are used to be explicit coached either from their previous coach’s parents or other people of influence. It is a lot easier to have everything explained along the way rather than finding it out themselves.
I also find that when parents are involved they want to see the coach to do a more explicit approach since this is what they expect from a traditional coach and feel if they pay for the service that’s what they should get from the practice.
Over the last season I have experimented with a new approach to one of the workouts where I went to the extreme of implicit learning and let the athletes do a free play workout. Every Sunday I would let them just do whatever they wanted as long as they got at least 45 minutes of pushing the race chair in. The athletes really liked it at first and they embraced the freedom of doing whatever they came up on the day. However, after about 2 months the workouts became less focused and all the athletes did was a 45-minute jog. After about 4 months some of the athletes did not even show up anymore since it was not seen as a valuable practice session to them.
This was very frustrating to me to watch and made me realize that they might have not been ready to be so free to decide and got lost with not having any direction or meaning to the practice although I explained to them that it was meant to be a fun workout.
I do wonder how to give minimal direction for the program but still keep them challenged so they think there is purpose to the practice or if I just have to rethink the whole program and restate our goals?
I will explore the free play practice in a different setting and maybe have the athletes write out a program that they will stick to rather than just show up and do whatever they feel on the day since they are so used to have a program for all the other workouts.