Carbon Offsets: Pay to Win or False Advertizing?

According to the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, countries around the world must reduce emissions by half of their 2010 levels by the year 2030 and achieve net-zero by 2050. However, emissions continue to rise at an accelerated rate. One solution many governments and corporations are adopting, including my most recent internship are known as carbon offsets, but how effective are these in reducing greenhouse gas emissions?

Carbon credits or offsets work by individuals or organizations paying an additional fee for any emissions they produce, which goes into projects that reduce carbon emissions.This is done either by reducing greenhouse gas emissions or increasing storage of carbon. The important point is that this is not done by the person purchasing the offset. The most common projects include planting trees, protecting forests, or providing alternative fuel sources. As of 2021, carbon offsets were a $1 billion industry, but it is not administered by any government or organization.

As someone who loves to travel the world, I am always wondering how I can reduce my impact given air travel is one of the heaviest emitting industries in the world. Nowadays, there are many carbon offset or carbon credit programs you can purchase along with your flight ticket to use your emissions as an investment into other, ideally regenerative solutions. One carbon offset credit represents an emissions reduction of 1 metric tonne of CO2 equivalent. However, numerous scientists and studies have been critical recently regarding the effectiveness of purchasing offsets. One common criticism is that carbon offsets don’t stop the root problem of heavy emissions. Bill Gates recently revealed he pays $7 million a year in offsets from his air travel yet continues flying around on a private jet.

Another critique is that often offsets don’t work as intended. Data from the Taskforce on Scaling Voluntary Carbon Markets found only 4% of offsets actively remove carbon from the atmosphere. In the EU, a carbon trading scheme known as the Clean Development Mechanism found that 85% of offsets were invested in programs unlikely to reduce emissions

To work, offsets must be used to create new, regenerative projects rather than only trade carbon by investing in existing ones. However, if we are to truly reach net-zero by 2050, we may need to tackle the emissions issue at its source, rather than simply throwing our money at others to make it go away.

Sources:

https://davidsuzuki.org/what-you-can-do/carbon-offsets/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/energy/what-are-carbon-offsets-and-how-many-really-work/2022/06/14/1741863c-ebdd-11ec-9f90-79df1fb28296_story.html

https://www.cbc.ca/radio/whatonearth/carbon-offsets-might-be-a-dangerous-distraction-from-more-effective-climate-action-experts-say-1.5946764

https://www.ipcc.ch/#:~:text=The%20Intergovernmental%20Panel%20on%20Climate%20Change%20(IPCC)%20is%20the%20United,science%20related%20to%20climate%20change.

 

« »

Spam prevention powered by Akismet