Author Archives: youwen zhang

Is Organic Food Healthier Than Conventional Foods?

Everyone is trying to eat healthy, and we know that means choosing plenty of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and lean protein. But as we wander the aisles of our local market, checking out the fresh produce, meats, and dairy products, we realize there’s another choice to make: Should we buy organic?
What does organic mean? Organic agriculture is an ecological production management system that promotes and enhances biodiversity, biological cycles and soil biological activity. It is based on minimal use of off-farm inputs and on management practices that restore, maintain and enhance ecological harmony.
Advocates say organic food is safer, possibly more nutritious, and often better tasting than non-organic food. They also say organic production is better for the environment and kinder to animals. Also, more and more shoppers seem convinced, but many experts say there’s not enough evidence to prove any real advantage to eating organic foods.
A team led by Bravata, a senior affiliate with Stanford’s Center for Health Policy, and Crystal Smith-Spangler, MD, MS, an instructor in the school’s Division of General Medical Disciplines and a physician-investigator at VA Palo Alto Health Care System, did the most comprehensive meta-analysis to date of existing studies comparing organic and conventional foods. For their study, the researchers sifted through thousands of papers and identified 237 of the most relevant to analyze. Those included 17 studies (six of which were randomized clinical trials) of populations consuming organic and conventional diets, and 223 studies that compared either the nutrient levels or the bacterial, fungal or pesticide contamination of various products (fruits, vegetables, grains, meats, milk, poultry, and eggs) grown organically and conventionally. There were no long-term studies of health outcomes of people consuming organic versus conventionally produced food; the duration of the studies involving human subjects ranged from two days to two years.
After analyzing the data, the researchers found little significant difference in health benefits between organic and conventional foods. No consistent differences were seen in the vitamin content of organic products, and only one nutrient — phosphorus — was significantly higher in organic versus conventionally grown produce (and the researchers note that because few people have phosphorous deficiency, this has little clinical significance). There was also no difference in protein or fat content between organic and conventional milk, though evidence from a limited number of studies suggested that organic milk may contain significantly higher levels of omega-3 fatty acids.
The researchers were also unable to identify specific fruits and vegetables for which organic appeared the consistently healthier choice, despite running what Bravata called “tons of analyses.”
“Some believe that organic food is always healthier and more nutritious,” said Smith-Spangler, who is also an instructor of medicine at the School of Medicine. “We were a little surprised that we didn’t find that.”

The Advantages and Disadvantages of Instant Noodles

Nowadays, the working pressure of many people has been increased sharply in modern times. In order to save time, it has been a common habit to eat instant noodles in our daily life. Therefore, instant noodles are a kind of essential food. However, instant noodles have always been regarded as junk food without any nutrition. In fact, many people are not sure at all about whether instant noodles have nutrition or not.
YouTube Preview Image
The content of oil contained in instant noodles takes up about 16% to 20% with less than 10% of protein, but the rest is starch. All the content of vitamin B and minerals comes from flour. However, the content of vitamin B and minerals contained in processed instant noodles is less than that contained in flour. That is to say that the nutrients contained in instant noodles are much less than those contained in ordinary cooked wheaten foods like steamed bread or baked pancakes. However, the content of oil in instant noodles is much higher.(1)
Last year, The Washington Post had reported of a South Korean study conducted on the effects of instant noodles on human health. According the study, “Although instant noodles is a convenient and delicious food, there could be an increased risk for metabolic syndrome given [the food’s] high sodium, unhealthy saturated fat and glycemic loads,” said Hyun Shin, a doctoral candidate at the Harvard School of Public Health and a co-author of the study. “Women who ate instant noodles twice a week or more had a higher risk of metabolic syndrome than those who ate less, or not at all, regardless of whether their diet style fell into the traditional or fast-food category, ” as published in The Washington Post.
The study concluded that excessive instant noodle consumption can not only trigger obesity but also metabolic ailments like diabetes, high blood pressure, hypertension, heart problems and so on.
In the other hand, the instant noodles are convenient enough to save more time, and it is easy to bring outside especially when you are travelling or camping. It is the best choice to fill your energy since it Is easy to cook.
In conclusion, if you have enough time, cooking the original food is the best; otherwise, you can choose the instant noodles even it is much better than the junk food with the high energy.

Reference:
1. Marlene Leung, Ramen risks: Why instant noodles are bad for your health, http://www.ctvnews.ca/health/ramen-risks-why-instant-noodles-are-bad-for-your-health-1.1965970. Published Tuesday, August 19, 2014 10:40AM EDT

Coffee and cancer mortality

Coffee has been a really important component of human diet and has been known the acute effect that maybe harmful on human health. As we know, coffee also contains beneficial compounds such as antioxidants, though the net effect of coffee on human health is also uncertain.

Recently, there is an organization which is called “JACC” in Japan. They assessed to the association of coffee with the all-cause and total cancer mortality. They followed up 110792 subjects aged 40-79 at baseline by conducting a large-scale cohort, aand then grouped them into four categories according their daily coffee intake: consuming less than 1 cup, 1 cup, 2 or 3 cups, and 4 or more cups. They also adjusted the other factors which maybe associated with the cancer mortality and coffee consumption such as smoking status, drinking status, and sleep length. The linear trend in the risk of mortality was assessed by treating the number of cups of coffee intake per day as ordinal variable. Further analysis stratified by baseline age in addition to gender was also conducted.

After they followed up for 16 years, the results showed the mortality was decreasing with the increased coffee consumption in both men and women. However, in women there was a slight risk elevation at the highest coffee consumption level compared with the second level. The result of further analysis, with exclusion of those with past medical history or those died early, th erisk of cancer mortality did not show any association with coffee comsumption in men, but was slightly reduced with increasing coffee consumption in women. The results also indicated the women aged 40-59 at baseline showed a slightly non-significant decreasing trend with the increasing coffee intake. However, the women aged 60-79 showed the risk reduction was only at the 2nd and 3rd level.

Youwen Zhang
Oct 2nd, 2016