Category Archives: uncategorized

Happy Halloween: Beware of the caries!

Halloween has approached us. Among the daunting horror films and scary costumes come the dreaded likelihood of cavities AKA dental caries (DUN DUN DUN)!

As a child I always wondered how cavities form, but I never looked into it because I didn’t want to face the awful truth that my beloved candy is actually plotting against me. But now that I am older, and hopefully wiser, I have figured out the true story of the candy cavity curse!

It begins the moment you present that delicious piece of candy to your mouth, and the simple sugars, specifically sucrose, are released into your oral cavity. The sugar feeds the already present bacteria on your teeth [1], which live in the plaque growing on the enamel. Plaque forms normally on your teeth by the combination of sucrose, and proteins from your saliva [2]. However unpreventable, it can be removed by frequent tooth-brushing. So bacteria such as Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans), which are round, cariogenic (causes tooth decay), and anaerobic, feed on the sucrose provided by the candy, to form lactic acid through glycolysis [2].

Glycolysis is an important process in which energy is produced. The process is outlined generally below.

Hydrolysis of Sucrose to form Glucose and Fructose Image Credit: Charles E Ophardt http://chemistry.elmhurst.edu/vchembook/548toothdecay.html

Hydrolysis of Sucrose to form Glucose and Fructose Image Credit: Charles E Ophardt http://chemistry.elmhurst.edu/vchembook/548toothdecay.html

Formation of Lactic Acid from Fructose via Glycolysis. Image Credit: Charles E Ophardt http://chemistry.elmhurst.edu/vchembook/548toothdecay.html

Formation of Lactic Acid from Fructose via Glycolysis. Image Credit: Charles E Ophardt http://chemistry.elmhurst.edu/vchembook/548toothdecay.html

S. mutans lives in the plaque trapped between your teeth, and lacks oxygen. Therefore it uses glycolysis to produce lactic acid under anaerobic conditions [3]. Lactic acid is very acidic. It has a pH level of 2 [4]. The added acidity decreases the pH of your mouth to initiate the dissolution of the calcium phosphate in your tooth enamel [3]. Thus, the start of a cavity. A description of the process is explained in the video below.

YouTube Preview Image

Despite the terror inflicted on my teeth due to my obsession with candy, I refuse to deprive myself of the traditional Halloween treat. Although ceasing the intake of sugar would obviously decrease the production of lactic acid on my teeth, also decreasing cavity formation, there are other methods being investigated to protect our teeth.

For example, Shelby Kashket, and Dominick P. DePaola have studied the anticariogenic effects of cheese [5]! They researched that possibly due to the buffering effects of dairy proteins on the lactic acid formation, and increased salivation when eating cheese, this helps in battling the cariogenic effects of S. mutans!

Additionally, Chu-hong Hu et al. developed a way to make large quantities of Glycyrrhizol A, an extraction of licorice root, into a sugar-free lollipop which can kill the S. mutans bacteria [6]! Talk about fighting fire with fire, or in this case, fighting candy with candy!

Finally, you can also use toothpaste with sodium bicarbonate, which raises the pH level in your mouth and neutralizes the acid [1]. Or rinse with fluoride, which speeds up the remineralization of the enamel, too [7].

So, I guess what I’m saying is, long live candy! And, apparently, cheese!
…Just make sure you brush and floss often, as well.

Happy Halloween, everyone!

Nicole Yipp

References:

[1] Dr Chemical, http://drchemical.com.au/why-does-sugar-cause-tooth-decay (accessed Oct 31, 2016).

[2]Loesche WJ. Role of Streptococcus mutans in human dental decay. Microbiol Rev. 1986;50:353–380.

[3] Ophardt, C. E. Tooth Decay http://chemistry.elmhurst.edu/vchembook/548toothdecay.html (accessed Oct 31, 2016).

[4] Lactic acid; MSDS No. 9924447 [Online]; Science Lab; Houston, Texas, May 21, 2013, http://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?msdsId=9924447 (accessed Oct 31, 2016).

[5] Kashket, S.; Depaola, D. P. Nutrition Reviews 200260 (4), 97–103.

[6] Hu, C. H.; He, J.; Eckert, R.; Wu, X. Y.; Li, L. N.; Tian, Y.; Lux, R.; Shuffer, J. A.; Gelman, F.; Mentes, J.; Spackman, S.; Bauer, J.; Anderson, M. H.; Shi, W. Y. International Journal of Oral Science 20113 (1), 13–20.

[7] Fluoride And Your Teeth http://www.colgate.com/en/us/oc/oral-health/basics/fluoride/article/fluoride-and-your-teeth (accessed Oct 31, 2016).

Is Sparkling Water Bad For Your Health?

 Is Sparkling Water Bad For Your Health?

Nowadays more and more different types of beverages have come to people’s life. And sparkling water is becoming popular due to its good taste, lovely bubbles and also it is a good alternative to sugary soft drinks. However a question has come to people’s concern: is sparkling water really good for health?

picture

a picture of sparkling water, courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

In a market you can find a lot of water which contains bubbles, such as club soda, soda water, seltzer water and fizzy water. Do not be dazzled. these different types of water are just some fancy names of carbonated water. They have similar produce process, ingredients and effects. The bubbles in sparkling water are come from carbon dioxide, when drinking sparkling water, it will produce carbon dioxide gas in your stomach ,which can make you feel full for a longer time compared to normal water. And thecarbon dioxide can react chemically with water producing carboxylic acid which causes sparkling water become acidic, with the following equations: CO2+H2O<—-> H2CO3, H2CO3<—-> H+ +HCO3-. However, do not worry drinking acidic beverage can make your body become acidic. There are buffers in your body can balance PH, and also your kidneys and lungs can remove excess carbon dioxide and maintain the PH.

However some people may compare sparkling waters with cola, due to they are all called “carbonated beverage”. Cola is not good for bone health, since it can weaken bone strength. It is not because cola is acidic, it is due to cola has other ingredients such as phosphorus. One researcher had found out there is no evidence showing carbonate consumption would effect bone strength.

Based on the information above, there is no evidence that sparkling water is bad for your healthy. In order to find the sparking water which is suitable for your body, always read the ingredient list and pay attention to ingredients.

 

Reference:

Carbonated Water Good or Bad? https://authoritynutrition.com/carbonated-water-good-or-bad/ (assessed on Oct 22nd 2016)
Is Carbonated Water Bad for You? http://www.healthline.com/health/food-nutrition/is-carbonated- water-bad-for-you#3. (assessed on Oct 22nd 2016).
Is Sparkling water as Healthy as Regular Water? rhttp://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/ sparkling-water-healthy-regular-water-article-1.1460179. (assessed on Oct 22nd 2016).

Video

When Facebook friends ‘share’ questionable things

Everyone has at least one friend on Facebook who has ‘shared’ something questionable to your News Feed. Sometimes it’s a girl from high school sharing a link about how essential oils are the to cure cancer and sometimes its a distant relative posting an article making outlandish claims about a politician.

facebook_new_logo_2015-svg

Facebook is often a social media platform where misinformation is easily spread. Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.  

What always shocked me was just how little the people posting this content knew about the subject.  Recently, a Facebook friend shared a picture that caught my attention. It showed someone holding up an information sheet about the flu vaccine and it read,


Here are some things in the insert not on the store’s sheet:
1. The single dose vial contains mercury at ≤1mcg (This is called a “trace amount” by the industry.) (The multi-vial contains 25 mcg.)
2. People with egg allergies are contraindicated.
3. “Safety and effectiveness have not been established in pregnant women, nursing mothers and children under four. There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. This vaccine should be used during pregnancy only if clearly needed. It is not known whether fluvarin is excreted in human milk.”
4. “Fluvarin has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.”
5. “Antibody response is low in the geriatric population.”
6. “Serious reactions, including anaphylactic shock, have been observed.”
7. “There are no data to assess the concomitant administration of flu vaccine with other vaccines.”
8. “The vaccine has been associated with an increased frequency of Guillain-Barre syndrome.”
9. “In some studies, fluvarin protected up to 50% of subjects.”

 

Now obviously the woman who originally made this post chose those points because she thought they highlighted some ugly hidden facts about vaccines that “Big Pharma” wouldn’t like people to know. I’m not an expert in vaccines, but a few years of school and the little bit of common sense I have made a few of those points seem ridiculously obvious.

fluzone_vaccine_extracting

A commonly discussed topic on Facebook is the efficacy and possible side effects of vaccines, too often without any scientific evidence referenced. Image courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Unfortunately, many people don’t seem to care to fact check what they share and a lot of misinformation ends up being spread like wildfire. I wanted to see just how easy it would be to find out more about each of the points made in her post. Turns out, it was really easy. Much to my chagrin I must admit, I became a bit of a keyboard warrior.

Now I should point out that this post is by far one of the tamer ones I’ve seen get passed around. No one is claiming that our government is deliberately giving us cancer by infecting our water sources or that global warming is a conspiracy fabricated by the Chinese (yes I’m referring to Drumpf supporters). It’s not even outright stating vaccines are bad. It is however, trying to shine a negative light on vaccines without any scientific research to back it up.

So Facebook friends, PLEASE don’t believe everything you read, and DO fact check before spreading what could be falsehoods. Google is an amazing tool and the world wide web is at your fingertips, so you don’t have any excuses. In the meantime, please feel free to forward this video to any Facebook friends who insist on sharing anti-vaccine posts.

YouTube Preview Image

 

Teixobactin, a new arsenal against bacteria

Pneumonia, meningitis, gonorrhea, cholera, Lyme disease, syphilis, strep throat, gastritis, ulcers, and the plague. These are just some common illnesses caused by a bacterial infection. Although only less than one percent of all bacterial species are harmful, they are experienced killers with powerful biological weapons. How powerful? The plaque alone is estimated to have killed 200 million people during 14th to 17th century (3) !  Luckily, humans are now armed with antibiotics, which are chemical compounds that target and kill bacterial cells without harming our cells. With the accidental discovery of world’s first antibiotic penicillin by Alexander Fleming in 1928, humans have been able to combat bacteria since (6).  However, things are changing fast. Bacteria are becoming resistant to antibiotics.
YouTube Preview Image
Antibiotic resistance is a serious issue that affects everyone and it’s not a problem of the future. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) which cause strep throat and tuberculosis respectively are just two of many bacterial species that are resistant to common antibiotics (11).  Antibiotic resistant bacteria infect over 2 million people a year and killing them require stronger antibiotics or alternate methods (11). The availability is limited for these alternatives and they are more expensive which can be a huge financial burden on the patient. Furthermore, over 25 thousand people are killed from the bacteria, proving how dangerous even a minor infection could be without the help of antibiotics (7).  Due to these reasons, health organizations around the world have made discovery of new antibiotics a top priority. With combined effort, a new class of antibiotic was discovered first time in 30 years: Teixobactin (4).

 

YouTube Preview Image
Each class of antibiotic has a unique way it kills bacteria. For example, β-lactam antibiotic such as penicillin attach to the bacterial cell wall, a protective casing that the bacteria produce. When attached, the antibiotic gets in the way of making the cell wall and the bacteria die off because it cannot survive without a cell wall (8). Unlike penicillin and all other antibiotic classes, Teixobactin kills bacteria by binding to the materials that bacteria need to make their cell wall (lipid II and lipid III) (4).  Because there isn’t any material for the bacteria to use to build a cell wall, they die off.  So far, the drug has shown to successfully kill antibiotic resistant MRSA and MTB (4) and because Teixobactin attacks multiple different weak points of bacteria (bind to both lipid II and lipid III), experts suggest that it will take 3o years or more for bacteria to develop resistance to it. (5) However, the researchers who discovered Teixobactin have yet to test the drug on humans and they still face challenges mass producing the drug. (7) They estimate that the drug may be available to the market in 5 years.

 

Jay Park

References:

(1) Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria https://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/health/conditionsandtreatments/antibiotic-resistant-bacteria (accessed Oct 18, 2016).

(2) Antibiotic Resistance of Tuberculosis http://dujs.dartmouth.edu/2009/02/new-trickes-for-an-old-foe-the-threat-of-antibiotic-resistant-tuberculosis/#.WAVjKujhBFw (accessed Oct 18, 2016).

(3) BBC News | HEALTH | De-coding the Black Death http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/1576875.stm (accessed Oct 18, 2016).

(4) Ling, L.; Schneider, T.; Peoples, A.; Spoering, A.; Engels, I.; Conlon, B.; Mueller, A.; Schäberle, T.; Hughes, D.; Epstein, S. et al. A New Antibiotic Kills Pathogens Without Detectable Resistance. Nature 2015, 517, 455-459.

(5) Sarah Knapton,. First new antibiotic in 30 years discovered in major breakthrough http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/03/14/first-new-antibiotic-in-30-years-discovered-in-major-breakthroug/ (accessed Oct 18, 2016).

(6) Alexander Fleming Discovery and Development of Penicillin – Landmark – American Chemical Society https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/flemingpenicillin.html (accessed Oct 18, 2016).

(7) New Antibiotic Kills TB, MRSA Without Building Resistance https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oavgheHGPFw (accessed Oct 18, 2016).

(8) ß-Lactams: Mechanisms of Action and Resistance https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBdYnRhdWcQ (accessed Oct 18, 2016).

(9) What causes antibiotic resistance? – Kevin Wu https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znnp-Ivj2ek (accessed Oct 18, 2016).

(10) Antibiotics: List of Common Antibiotics & Types – Drugs.com https://www.drugs.com/article/antibiotics.html (accessed Oct 18, 2016).

(11) Antibiotic resistance http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/antibiotic-resistance/en/ (accessed Oct 18, 2016).

 

PLUTO IS DEAD

On August 24, 2006 Pluto died1. Okay maybe it didn’t exactly die, but Pluto the planet died and Pluto the dwarf planet was born. I remember hearing the news in the beginning of grade five and I was FURIOUS. Not because of Pluto’s demotion, but because my mnemonic for memorizing the planets names no longer made sense. “My Very Educated Mother Just Served Us Nine Pizzas” had become “My Very Educated Mother Just Served Us Nine.” Nine what?!

Planet Mnemonic Source: Simplyilka. http://simplyilka.com/2014/10/23/5-science-jokes-everyone/ (accessed Oct 16, 2016)

Planet Mnemonic
Source: Simplyilka. http://simplyilka.com/2014/10/23/5-science-jokes-everyone/ (accessed Oct 16, 2016)

The decision to demote Pluto was very controversial, many scientists and people, including myself, saw the nine planets as fixtures in the sky that represented our small section in the universe. So why did Pluto get demoted after 75 years of being a planet and why was the decision so controversial?

Unlike all the other planets Pluto was an oddball to begin with. Pluto’s eccentric orbit crosses Neptune’s orbit for about 20 years out of its 248 year orbit2. No other planets cross orbital paths! The only other objects that do, are comets and asteroids.

In 2005, Caltech astronomer Mike Brown aka Pluto Killer announced the discovery of Eris, an object in the Kuiper belt that was similar in size to Pluto3. NASA defines the Kuiper Belt as “a disc-shaped region of icy bodies- including Pluto- and comets beyond the orbit of Neptune4.” So if we considered Pluto a planet then Eris would have to become the tenth planet. However, since the discovery of Eris, more objects in the Kuiper Belt were identified as having masses comparable to Pluto. That’s when the International Astronomical Union (IAU) had to step in and redefine the term planet.

Other Objects in the Kuiper Belt Source: Amos, J. Pluto flyby: Meet the 'King of the Kuiper Belt,' BBC News. http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-33500681 (accessed Oct 16, 2016)

Other Objects in the Kuiper Belt
Source: Amos, J. Pluto flyby: Meet the ‘King of the Kuiper Belt,’ BBC News. http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-33500681 (accessed Oct 16, 2016)

The new definition of planet needs to meet three criterion5: (1) must orbit the sun, (2) have sufficient mass to be round, or nearly round, (3) has cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit.

Unfortunately Pluto did not meet the last criterion because it shares its orbital neighbourhood with other objects in the Kuiper belt. Alan Stern, leader of NASA’s New Horizon mission, along with many other scientists were not happy with this new definition of planets. Stern told SPACE.com. “A river is a river, independent of whether there are other rivers nearby. In science, we call things what they are based on their attributes, not what they’re next to3.” However Stern may have some bias on the subject because he was leading the New Horizon Mission to Pluto, which was launched in early 2006. Leading a launch to a planet is much more exciting then leading one to a dwarf planet.

After doing all of this research and understanding the arguments each side was making, my opinion on Pluto’s status as a planet changed. Although it would be nice for my mnemonic of the planets to make sense, our knowledge of the universe is constantly changing and evolving, and along with it definitions for our universe need to change too.

Until our next journey, live long and prosper…unless you’re Pluto

By: Flora Iranmanesh

References:

(1) Inman, M. Pluto Not a Planet, Astronomers Rule. National Geographic [online], August 24, 2006. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/08/060824-pluto-planet.html (accessed Oct 16, 2016)

(2) Spaleta, S. Neil deGrasse Tyson’s Case Against Pluto’s ‘Planet-hood. video file, Space.com, July, 14 2015. http://www.space.com/29949-neil-degrasse-tyson-s-case-against-pluto-s-planet-hood-video.html (accessed Oct 16, 2016)

(3) Wall, M. Five Years Later, Pluto’s Planethood Demotion Still Stirs Controversy. space.com [online], August 24, 2011. http://www.space.com/12709-pluto-dwarf-planet-decision-5-years-anniversary-iau.html (accessed Oct 16, 2016)

(4) Solar System Exploration NASA Science, Kuiper Belt: Overview. http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/kbos (accessed Oct 16, 2016)

(5) Howell, E. What Is a Planet? space.com [online], May 22, 2014. http://www.space.com/25986-planet-definition.html (accessed Oct 16, 2016)

 

What you do not know about the gasoline?

What you do not know about the gasoline?
During last summer time back to China, I found out at gas stations gasoline were labelled as different numbers, such as #92, #93, #95, and #97. As far as I know, in the past several years most peo- ple were using #93 and #97, but recently government tries to encourage public using #92 and #95. And then I was curious about the following questions: What do these numbers represent? Which number is the best choice for divers? And why does government encourage public purchasing spe- cific numbered gasoline?

I have asked some people whether they know the meaning of different numbered gasoline, most of them told me the higher number represents the purer gasoline. However according to “Urban Trans- port And the Environment” article, the number has no relationship with gasoline’s purity, it only refers to the amount of octane in the gasoline. The presence of Octane can reduce the explosion possibility. And the higher octane rating is, the less likely explode will occur. This phenomenon is due to octane burns slowly with its long hydrocarbon chain. Based on thermodynamics and engine efficiency, different engines have various compression rations. Normally the lower compression ratio a vehicle has, the smaller number of gasoline it should use, and when a high numbered gasoline is used by a low compression ratio vehicle , it could cause incomplete combustion and can be harmful for the engine.

Nowadays governments are encouraging public to use #92 gasoline instead of #93. This is because #92 is more environmental friendly than #93. As being reported, sulfur content limit in #92 has been reduced from 50 mg per kilogram to 10 mg per kilogram compared with #93. When using gasoline #92 instead of #93, it becomes better for environment.

Based on the information above, the gasoline which is being used recently becomes more and more environmental friendly. And a higher numbered gasoline does not guarantee it would be better for engine, it only represents the more octane existing in gasoline.

Reference:

The difference between #92 gasoline and #93 http://www.autohome.com.cn/dealer/201405/12201588.html(assessed Oct 2nd 2016). http://bbs.pcauto.com.cn/topic-5089619.html
Octane Rating
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octane_rating(assessed Oct 2nd 2016).
What does 92, 95 and 98 on petrol mean? https://onthegreenwagon.wordpress.com/2014/10/14/what-does-92-95-and-98-on-petrol-means/ (assessed Oct 2nd 2016).

Winter is coming.

Let’s face it; summer is over. The cold months approach us, and unfortunately so do the infamous waves of common colds and viruses, too. Time to prepare for battle. But don’t worry; the fight against illness isn’t actually as vigorous as you might think. All we have to do is—pause for dramatic effect—wash our hands! It sounds too easy, doesn’t it? Well, luckily for everyone—for once in our undergraduate lives—it really is as easy as it seems!

At the University of Colorado, a study involving 430 students from 4 different residence halls investigated the efficacy of a hand-washing campaign as well as the use of alcohol gel hand-sanitizer in the fight against upper-respiratory illness (1). According to MedicineNet.com, upper-respiratory illness includes symptoms such as sneezing, nasal congestion, a runny nose, fever, and a sore throat, to name a few (2).  The study involved dividing the students into control and product groups, and statistically analyzed them for differences in illness rates, symptoms, and the number of absences from classes.  For the product groups, alcohol gel hand–sanitizer dispensers were mounted in every room, bathroom, and dining hall, and a hand washing message campaign covered bulletin boards throughout the residence halls, which carried weekly messages regarding hand washing hygiene. The control group was told they were participating in a wellness study but received no sanitizer dispensers or campaigning bulletin boards.

The study presented significant results. Although the data consisted of only self-reported symptoms and not clinically obtained information, the results displayed a recognizable increase in hand-washing and use of hand-sanitizer from the product groups, and thence a noticeable decrease in the amount of illness, absences, and symptoms of upper-respiratory illness as well.

Additionally, a study performed on children in Karachi, Pakistan also resulted with respiratory infections substantially decreasing after months of promoted hand washing (3).

Another article, in The New England Journal of Medicine, researched the transmission of rhinovirus infections (4). Rhinovirus infections cause 1/3 or more of the common colds, and proliferates primarily in the nose. Fortunately, the symptoms that arise are unlike the cartoon shown.

The investigation found that the virus is spread from the hands of the infected individual to either direct contact with another individual’s hands, or indirect contact via an intermediate surface. The recipient unknowingly spreads the infection by touching their face, eyes, or mouth, and contracts the virus. This video explains how the common cold works.

The moral of this story is to wash your hands before ever touching your face, eyes, or mouth!

However, squeezing soap on your hands and rinsing it off doesn’t suffice. In order to fully remove the bacteria, you must be thorough. Fortunately, some public washrooms show you how! An example of a sign showing efficient hand washing procedure is depicted below.

There you have it, folks. Keep it clean. Wash your hands as often as necessary; it’s probably the easiest way to fight against that nasty cold we all dread!

References:

  1. White, C.; Kolble, R.; Carlson, R.; Lipson, N. Journal of American College Health 2005, 53 (4), 175–181.
  2. FACEP, J. R. B. D. O.; MPH, S. N. N. M. D. Upper Respiratory Tract Infection Symptoms and Treatment http://www.medicinenet.com/upper_respiratory_infection/article.htm (accessed Oct 11, 2016).
  3. Luby, S. P.; Agboatwalla, M.; Feikin, D. R.; Painter, J.; Billhimer, W.; Altaf, A.; Hoekstra, R. M. The Lancet 2005, 366 (9481), 225–233.
  4. Hendley, J. O.; Wenzel, R. P.; Gwaltney, J. M. New England Journal of Medicine 1973, 288 (26), 1361–1364.

Black Holes Don’t Suck!

As a mega fan of sci-fi movies and astronomy I am always confronted with the bitter taste of space ignorance. One of the most common misconceptions–not only in sci-fi movies but also in our pop culture–is about black holes. Ever heard of the phrase “getting sucked into a black hole?” Newton’s law of gravitation tells us that masses in gravitational fields orbit each other in ellipses, parabolas and hyperbolas. Notice how “sucking” isn’t on this list.

YouTube Preview Image

 

For us to have a better understanding of the universe we live in, we must get rid of misconceptions in science and replace them with facts. So if a black hole doesn’t “suck” then what does really happen at a black hole?

Before we can take this journey through space together, some elements need to be defined for the less nerdy astronomy readers.

Black holes are the remaining cores of massive stars. So, basically a lot of mass squeezed into a tiny space, which results in a strong gravitational pull. This strong gravitational pull arises from the curvature of space. Imagine if the universe was a giant rubber sheet with objects of different masses spread throughout it. Heavier objects would curve the rubber sheet more than lighter objects. A black hole on this sheet would be like a bottomless pit—a hole in the observable universe.

On the left, an optical image from the Digitized Sky Survey shows Cygnus X-1, outlined in a red box. Cygnus X-1 is located near large active regions of star formation in the Milky Way, as seen in this image that spans some 700 light years across. An artist's illustration on the right depicts what astronomers think is happening within the Cygnus X-1 system. Cygnus X-1 is a so-called stellar-mass black hole, a class of black holes that comes from the collapse of a massive star. New studies with data from Chandra and several other telescopes have determined the black hole's spin, mass, and distance with unprecedented accuracy. Credits: NASA/CXC/M.Weiss Source: http://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/k-4/stories/nasa-knows/what-is-a-black-hole-k4.html

An artist’s drawing of the black hole Cygnus X-1, pulling in matter from a nearby blue star. Credits: NASA/CXC/M.Weiss Source: http://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/k-4/stories/nasa-knows/what-is-a-black-hole-k4.html

 

An illustration of the “rubber sheet” 2-D simplification of gravity’s effect on space-time, with a 1-D profile of the shape of the curve along any one direction. Image Credit: BenRG, public domain Source: https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/astroquizzical-how-does-gravity-escape-from-a-black-hole-5ef156bf048d#.v1pxirpaz

An illustration of the “rubber sheet” 2-D simplification of gravity’s effect on space-time, with a 1-D profile of the shape of the curve along any one direction.
Image Credit: BenRG, public domain
Source: https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/astroquizzical-how-does-gravity-escape-from-a-black-hole-5ef156bf048d#.v1pxirpaz

So passing by a black hole we wouldn’t get sucked in, unless we were unfortunate enough to get pulled into its gravitational field. If we did managed to get pulled in, we would disappear from the observable universe. This is because the gravitational pull is so strong that not even light can escape a black hole. Thus being given the name “black” hole.

To our friends outside the black hole it may seem that we did in fact get sucked in because we vanished from sight. But we know this isn’t true, and sadly we can never leave the black hole to tell our friends. So as we frantically wave our arms and call out to our friends for help, they head back home and tell everyone that black holes do in fact suck. 🙁

Until our next journey, live long and prosper.

By: Flora Iranmanesh

Over consumption of sugar- the real enemy of your health

 

When talking about eating healthy and keeping fit, what people think of in general is to avoid food with high calories and fat.  A lot of people do not seem to see sugar as a threat to our health, in reality, eating too much sugar will cause much more serious problems than most people thought, sugar is actually the biggest threat to our health. What makes the situation worse is that a lot of people consume too much sugar nowadays because many types of food and drinks contain sugar.

YouTube Preview Image

It is not a good idea to refuse eating sugar, either, because it is a necessary source of nutrition that keeps a person alive. The over-consumption of sugar is the real problem.  One of the most serious problems it will cause is diabetes.  Not all patient gets diabetes because of having too much sugar, but studies have shown that it will significantly the risk of getting diabetes. Diabetes is the disease due to the high blood sugar level that cannot be controlled because of the dysfunction of insulin, which is essential for controlling the blood sugar level.  Over-consumption of sugar will increase the work load of insulin, and this will increase the risk of its dysfunction, thus causes diabetes.

1

Fig1: type 2 diabetes due to the dysfunction of insulin, your blood sugar level will not be controlled properly if insulin does not work 

Eating too much sugar will also damage a person’s nervous system. Although sugar is a main source of energy that makes our brains work, it requires no more than 40mg per day. Massive amount of sugar will damages the brain, causes poor memory formation, learning disorders and depression. This is the reason professional sportsmen and sportswomen are asked to strictly control the amount of sugar they consume every day. In order to give their best performance on the court, there nervous system must be in the best condition, and too much sugar will not help them with that. Dwight Howard, a NBA basketball star, had a terrible performance in the season of 2012-2013, except for being recovered from back injury; failure to control the amount sugar consumption was another reason for his poor performance.

Nutritionists suggested that in general an adult should eat no more than 25g of refined sugar per day. Many people eat more sugar than they actually need because they eat a lot of processed food, and many processed foods contain a lot of sugar within it .  Besides soft drinks and desserts, some breakfast cereals, which is considered as healthy food, contains a massive amount of sugar, too. If you really want to reduce the consumption of sugar, it is a good idea to start to avoid processed food, eat more natural food instead.

pic-howmuchsugar

Fig 2;sugar composition of some soft drinks. Remember, a adult need no more than 25 grams of refined sugar per day

ozark-bw-icecream

Fig3: Nutrition facts of ice-cream

fruit-loops-nutritional-panel1-e1347562977628

Fig4: Nutrition facts of fruit loops, a type of breakfast cereal, it is surprising to know that this contains a lot of sugar, too.

Over-consumption of sugar will bring a lot of health-related problems besides increasing weight. Controlling the amount of sugar (especially the refined sugar) you eat every day is as important as controlling the calories.  It may be a good idea to have a look at the nutrition table before you eat something so that you know how much you are allowed to eat to keep a healthy sugar level.

-Xupeng Yang

 

 

What you do not know about the gasoline?

                   What you do not know about the gasoline?
During last summer time back to China, I found out gasoline on the market has different labels such as #90, #93, #95, #97 etc. Most people are using #93 and #97, but the government tries to encourage divers using #92 and #95. What does these number represent? Which number is the best choice for divers? And why does government encourage public purchasing specific numbered gasoline?

image

According to “Urban Transport And the Environment” article, the number has no relationship with petrol purity, but it refers to the amount of octane is in the petrol. The higher the octane rating is, the less likely explode will occur, because octane burns slower since it has longer-chained hydrocarbon and is more resistant to igniting prematurely. 

Various numbers of petrol are suitable for different types of vehicles, basically the lower compression ratio a vehicle has, the smaller number of petrol it should use. The choice among gasolines is still depends on specifications, if a high numbered petrol used in a low compression ratio vehicle , it could cause incomplete combustion which is harmful for the engine.

Nowadays governments are encouraging public to use #92 instead of #93. This phenomenon is due to sulfur content limit in #92 is reduced from 50 mg per kilogram to 10 mg per kilogram, which means #92 is more friendly to environment. When petrol changing from #93 to #92, even the amount of octane is reduced and the anti-explosion possibility decreased, it becomes better for environment.

As says from a Chinese website that there has no definition about which petrol is good. The best petrol is the one which vehicle could be most adapted.

Reference:
Picture about gas station
http://www.cp24.com/news/enviro-group-wants-warning-for-gas-pumps-1.1225836(assessed Oct 2nd 2016).
The difference between #92 gasoline and #93
http://www.autohome.com.cn/dealer/201405/12201588.html(assessed Oct 2nd 2016).
http://bbs.pcauto.com.cn/topic-5089619.html
Octane Rating
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octane_rating(assessed Oct 2nd 2016).
What does 92, 95 and 98 on petrol means?
https://onthegreenwagon.wordpress.com/2014/10/14/what-does-92-95-and-98-on-petrol-means/(assessed Oct 2nd 2016).