Category Archives: Uncategorized

Binge Drinking in the United States: The Growing Trend of Alcoholic Misuse

St. Patrick’s Day is a holiday most popular for sharing a glass of Guinness with friends. However, it is not commonly known that binge-drinking accounts for more than half of all alcohol related deaths in the United States annually.

Figure 1: Alcoholic beverages Source: Flickr

Binge drinking is defined as consuming more than five drinks in a two-hour span for men and consuming more than four drinks in a two-hour span for women was recently studied by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. In this study, a drink can consist of a 12-ounce glass of beer, one 5-ounce glass of wine or one shot of hard liquor.

Figure 2: Guideline for what is classified as a “drink” Source: CDC

This study surveyed over 400,000 participants across the United States ages 18 and over about their drinking habits in the past 30 days. Some questions included the number of times participants drank, the amount of alcoholic beverages consumed and the most alcohol they consumed in one outing.

The results showed of the 17.5 billion reported drinks consumed, men were drinking four out of every five beverages. Men were also reported to consume twice the amount of alcohol compared to women.

They also found that adults over the age of 35 were consuming over half of all the reported drinks consumed.

Overall, one in six Americans were reported to have been binge drinking in the thirty day period surveyed. On average, the frequency was at least once a week with seven alcoholic beverages consumed.

It was reported that binge-drinking cost the United States $191 billion in health care expenditures, criminal justice costs and other related costs. With alcohol use disorder (AUD) on the rise each year, as reported by the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions, it is important to educate the public on the dangers of binge drinking and provide preventative measures through counselling.

As with anything in life, it is all in moderation.

-Brandon Kato

References:

1.http://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(17)30753-5/fulltext

2.https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/article-abstract/2647079?redirect=true

3. https://www.flickr.com/photos/pure-water/4236552628/in/photolist-7snruQ-e4ogE1-evWhFU-3gRJMK-68kLtR-grTep-9AF438-96tk3T-8ZEAW2-bo5LMu-8vxWjT-6Rtuu1-5qWhb1-UK6CHN-cHqfS-3PZkcE-8B6jac-sU67sc-8ZHBks-6vR66z-846qe6-9kbKUu-4wBBAW-kSzduM-a8ohb6-5BoCca-976jdc-5LkuxL-4fgkiE-a2TtfQ-788dqm-6cR178-8ZHF7L-6vVhMy-6kQonm-9h5TW3-nvUfYp-46TjW4-dmvwhX-7RzPV-72mANu-a82HkS-6vVhQ3-uTUH-8uWYuC-7WMFRM-aDKEo-5Bua2X-bysKZi-5By5Ro

4.https://www.cdc.gov/alcohol/fact-sheets/moderate-drinking.htm

 

Repetitive Negative Thinking Leads to Less Sleep

Sleeping cat. Image courtesy of: Emanuele Spies on Flickr

Have you ever woken up in the middle of the night unable to sleep because you are worrying about your future and you continue to think about the worst possible scenarios? No matter the reason, we all get negative thoughts once in a while and these thoughts can lead to less sleep than the required 7-9 hours for adults from ages 18 to 65. Researchers have found that people who sleep less than 8 hours a night are more likely to suffer from depression and anxiety.

Rumination is the act of repetitively dwelling on thoughts that cause anxiety and distress. Your brain cycles through problems without solving them and when this happens, it can lead to negative thinking. This is especially dangerous for people who are depressed or anxious because it is difficult to switch perspectives and look for solutions to the problems. Thus, rumination intensifies and so do anxiety and depression.

This year, researchers found that a shorter sleep duration is related to the difficulty of disengaging individuals from rumination. Jacob Nota and Meredith Coles at Binghamton University, conducted a study with 52 community members from ages 18 to 65 with heightened repetitive negative thinking and varying sleep durations. Of the 52 participants, 50% of them met the criteria for major depressive disorder, 44.2% met the criteria for generalized anxiety order, and 36.5% met the criteria for social anxiety disorder; some participants fit multiple categories.

Figure 1: Schematic of how Nota and Coles conducted the attention task. Seventy-eight trials were done.

They showed the participants positive (e.g. nature scenes) or negative (e.g. guns, knives) images paired with a neutral (e.g. household items) image. When the participant fixated on one image, researchers put the other image in a frame to direct the eyes and track eye movement as shown in Figure 1.

On average, 92% of the time, participants would look at the negative image first when paired with the neutral image. When the positive image was paired with the neutral image, participants would look at the neutral image first. Participants were also, on average, 79% slower disengaging from the negative image when paired with the neutral image as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Average percent of participants that would engage with a type of image first and average percent of participants that would slowly disengage from a type of image.

After asking participants about their habitual sleep duration, 96% of those with a shorter sleep duration spent more time looking at the negative image than the neutral image and had difficulty fixating on the neutral image compared to the negative image.

Despite this interesting discovery, researchers are still evaluating how the timing and duration of sleep may contribute to the development of depression and stress. Further research can then allow psychologists to treat anxiety and depression by adjusting their patients’ sleep cycles to a healthier time.

Want to know more about negative thinking and how to stop it to get a good night’s rest? Check out the video above!

– Sara Djondovic

References

  1. Bergland, C. (2015). The Brain Mechanics of Rumination and Repetitive Thinking. Psychology Today. Retrieved March 18, 2018 from https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-athletes-way/201508/the-brain-mechanics-rumination-and-repetitive-thinking.
  2. Binghamton University. (2018). People who sleep less than 8 hours a night more likely to suffer from depression, anxiety. ScienceDaily. Retrieved March 18, 2018 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/01/180104152947.htm.
  3. Gura, L. [Actualized.org]. (2014). Negative Thoughts – The Origin Of Negative Thinking & How To Eliminate It Forever. Retrieved March 19, 2018 from https://youtu.be/mggupbkTmWc.
  4. N. A. (n.d.). How Much Sleep Do We Really Need? National Sleep Foundation. Retrieved March 18, 2018 from https://sleepfoundation.org/excessivesleepiness/content/how-much-sleep-do-we-really-need-0.
  5. Nota, J. A. & Coles, M. E. (2018). Shorter sleep duration and longer sleep onset latency are related to difficulty disengaging attention from negative emotional images in individuals with elevated transdiagnostic repetitive negative thinking. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 58, 114-122. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005791617300629.
  6. Wehrenberg, M. (2016). Rumination: A Problem in Anxiety and Depression. Psychology Today. Retrieved March 18, 2018 from https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/depression-management-techniques/201604/rumination-problem-in-anxiety-and-depression.

City noise linked to heart disease

Figure 1 shows motorcyclists as a source of noise pollution. Source: Wikimedia Commons

Every day, on our way to school, to work, or even to run errands, we’re exposed to all kinds of city noise. Loud noise from construction sites, sirens, public transportation and heavy road traffic can be an annoyance to many of us. When it comes to constant exposure to these kinds of noises, we usually worry about the damage it can make to our ears. But now, a recent review, published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology on Feb 5, 2018, explores the connection between high levels of city noise and cardiovascular disease, showing  that noise pollution is more than simply just a disturbance but also a threat to our health at the cellular level.

Video: Noise Pollution Is Much Worse For You Than You Think by Tech Insider

Although there isn’t much evidence that noise directly causes heart problems, it is the symptoms from chronic stress induced by noise, such as increased blood pressure and heart rate, which ultimately lead to unfavorable effects on the cardiovascular system. According to German researcher Thomas Münzel, after compiling previous research on noise pollution and heart health, he found that high levels of noise activate the sympathetic nervous system involved in the fight or flight response. As a result, this causes a steep increase in the stress hormone, cortisol (Figure 2), causing harm to the vascular system.

Figure 2 shows the structure of the stress hormone, cortisol. Source: Wikimedia Commons

Münzel and his team tested their claim by building animal models based on the result of exposing of mice to aircraft noise at a mean sound pressure level of 72 decibels for several days. Some of the factors they tested were systolic blood pressure and vasoconstriction, the constriction of blood vessels. According to Figure 3 and 4, as the number of days exposed to aircraft noise increased, systolic blood pressure as well as vasoconstriction in mice increased.

Figure 3 shows that as mice are exposed to aircraft noise for longer periods, their systolic blood pressure increases. Data obtained from paper.

Figure 4 shows that vasoconstriction in mice increases with the number of days they are exposed to aircraft noise. Data obtained from paper.

An increase in these symptoms associated with the vascular system can increase arterial stiffness and clog arteries. These results from mice can be extrapolated to humans to show that frequent exposure to loud noises cause symptoms that can lead to cardiovascular disease. Though not much can be done by the general public and doctors besides avoiding exposure to loud noises, Münzel believes that change is in the hands of the politicians to ensure new developments are taking place to reduce the noise level in cities.

-Annelie

References:

  1. Münzel, T.; Schmidt, F. P.; Steven, S.; Herzog, J.; Daiber, A.; Sørensen, M. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2018, 71 (6), 688–697.
  2. Macmillan, A. Noise Pollution Increases Risk for Heart Disease http://time.com/5135279/noise-pollution-increases-heart-risk/ (accessed Mar 6, 2018).
  3. Bever, L. Why car horns, planes and sirens might be bad for your heart https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2018/02/06/why-car-horns-and-other-common-loud-noises-may-be-bad-for-your-heart/?utm_term=.407c72ef8392 (accessed Mar 6, 2018).
Image

Moose Population Analysis – Fewer Yearly Hunters

Animal populations change over time, such is a well-known fact. There are many factors contributing to cause a specie’s population to change, some of these natural and some man-made. Animal populations are often monitored over time and their habitats investigated to find the cause of the population change. Over a period of 28 years, from 1987 – 2014, moose population numbers were counted yearly along with the numbers of licensed hunters and hunter harvest estimates.

The graph below shows that the numbers of yearly hunters decreased over time. However, the population report states that moose populations remained relatively constant over time. This shows that the numbers of hunters does not have too large an effect on the moose populations, and to accurately model the change in moose populations, other factors must also be included, such as food availability, weather/climate, diseases, etc.

Reference: Kuzyk, Gerald W. “Provincial Population and Harvest Estimates of Moose in British Columbia.” Alces, vol. 52, 01/01/2016, pp. 1,

Link

Sea level acceleration over 25 years

The global mean sea level has been measured by satellite altimetry to be increasing by 3mm ±0.4mm per year, resulting in more than 7cm of total sea-level rise over the last 25 years. Steve Nerem and his colleagues showed that this rate is accelerating at 0.084 ± 0.025 mm/y2. At this rate, it is possible that in 2100 the sea level will rise 65cm. This can potentially cause problems for coastal cities.

Acceleration is mainly caused by the ice melting in Greenland and Antarctica, and the expansion of sea water due to warming by an increase in greenhouse gas concentrations. The U.S/European TOPEX/Poseidon, Jason-1, Jason-2, and Jason-3 satellite missions were used to measure these increases since 1992. However, detecting acceleration is difficult due to fluctuations caused by volcanic eruptions and errors of the instruments.


This data was obtained from the satellite altimeter record of Global Mean Sea Level over the last 25 years. An approximate 7cm of total sea level rise is seen from 1993-2017.

Temperature fluctuations between the ocean and atmosphere, known as El Niños and La Niñas, could also lead to sea level fluctuations. Therefore, Nerem and his colleagues used climate models to determine the opposing phases of the El Niños Southern Oscillation in order to find the sea level acceleration more accurately. They also examined the sea level difference between altimetry and tide gauges over time to find errors, such as instrument drift, in the altimeter measurements.

Co-author John Fasullo said the study is an important role for satellite records in validating climate model projections and interpreting satellite records, such as estimating the background effects of the 1991eruption of Mount Pinatubo on global sea level.

-Anita Wang

 

Reference:

Sea level rise accelerating: acceleration in 25-year satellite sea level record https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/02/180212150739.htm

R. S. Nerem, B. D. Beckley, J. T. Fasullo, B. D. Hamlington, D. Masters and G. T. Mitchum. Climate-change–driven accelerated sea-level rise detected in the altimeter eraPNAS, 2018

Cool Clothing, Literally!

With no solution on how to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the concept of personal thermal management is becoming a promising alternative to renewable energy resources. Personal thermal management focuses on cooling or heating the human body instead of an entire building. This is the most cost-effective way to solve the energy dilemma.

A team of researchers at Stanford University have found one way of reducing energy consumption by demonstrating the use of nanoporous polyethylene (nanoPE) as a textile for human clothing. They predict that this fabric could reduce the amount of energy used for air conditioning.

A portion of heat from our bodies is released through the emission of IR radiation in the range of  7 – 14 nm. Many of the fabrics we wear have chemical groups that absorb radiation in that range. One fabric, Polyethylene, is transparent to IR but it is also transparent to visible light which is not desirable as it causes our bodies to increase in temperature.

Figure 1. The schematics of human body radiation, visible light and air convection. Source: Cui et al., 2016

However, Ci Yui and his colleagues at Stanford University hypothesized that if polyethylene had pores between 50 – 1000 nm in diameter then it could scatter visible light, making it opaque, but still allow IR to pass through. Fortunately, such a material already exists and is commercially available. Lithium-ion batteries use nanoPE as a separator between anodes and cathodes to prevent electrical shortages.

Figure 2. The total IR transmittance of bare skin, normal PE, nanoPE, cotton, Tyvek and PDA-nanoPE-mesh. Credit; Cui et al., 2016

Yui and his team used a device to simulate the heat output of skin and tested the cooling effects of nanoPE, cotton and Tyvek, a fibrous polyethylene textile manufactured by DuPont. They found that compared to cotton, nanoPE was able to cool bare skin by 2.7°C more. In addition, nanoPE was the only material of the three tested to reveal the H-shape, mimicking bare skin,  because of its IR transparency.

Figure 3. Thermal measurement nanoPE, cotton and Tyvek. (A) The device used to simulate the heat out put of skin. A thermocouple is used to measure temperature. (B) The thermal measurement of each material. (C) Thermal imaging of bare skin and the three materials tested. Source: Cui et al., 2016..

“That may not sound like much, but in terms of energy savings it actually could be huge”, says Svetlana Boriskina of Massachusetss Institute of Technology, who wrote on the Yui’s findings in Science. She points out that setting a home’s thermostat a few degrees lower can cut energy use up to 45%.

To make the material more appealing, Yui and his team coated the nanoPE to wick away moisture to keep the wearer feeling dry.” Yui and his colleagues may have demonstrated another function of nanoPE, but more research is needed to test for its comfort, durability and a way to colour the material with dyes that won’t block IR radiation.” adds Boriskina.

-Ashlea Ahmed

Resources:

Hsu, P.; Song, A.; Catrysse, P.; Liu, C.; Peng, Y.; Xie, J.; Fan, S.; Cui, Y. Radiative Human Body Cooling by Nanoporous Polyethylene Textile. Science [Online] 2016, 353, 1019-1023 http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/353/6303/1019.full.pdf (accessed Mar 4, 2018).

Scientific American. Newest Material Makes Coolest Clothing Around.https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/new-material-makes-coolest-clothing-around/ (accessed Mar 4, 2018).

 

 

 

Arctic Report Card: Unprecedented Decline in Arctic Sea Ice

The Arctic Ocean has been observed to reliably freeze every winter, however the rise in Arctic temperature just now caught up with the rate of ice forming in this region. This results in the most unprecedented transformation of the Arctic environment since the dawn of human civilization: It no longer freezes.

The latest Arctic Report, published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), shows that in recent years a warming trend persisted, showing “no sign of returning to reliably frozen region of recent past decades”. Scientists determined that the warming will continue to increase at double the rate of global temperature increase.

2017 saw a historical low for maximum sea ice extent. The Arctic experienced “the largest magnitude decline in sea ice, and the greatest sustained rate in sea ice decline in that 1,500-year record,” said Emily Osborne, a NOAA scientist, citing a study by Kinnard et al. This means that in recent years less and less of the Arctic ocean freezes during peak winter. This is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Reconstruction of approximately 5-year mean sea ice extent (Kinnard et al., 2011) spanning the last 1,500 years

How does this look for 2018? Meteorologist Eric Holthaus said “the middle of February is the usual time of the annual low for the planet’s sea ice.” The National Snow & Ice Data Center (NSIDC) reported that current Arctic sea-ice extent is even lower than 2017 data, despite experiencing one of the coldest winters in recent years. This trend is shown in the graph below.

Figure 2 Data collected by NSIDC and NASA

Area is calculated from NSIDC sea ice concentration data, measuring a grid cell covered in sea ice of 15% concentration or more. As of now, the planet is covered in just under 16 million square kilometers of sea-ice, 1.36 million square kilometers below the 1981–2010 average:

Sea Ice Extent as of January 2018 (National Snow and Ice Data Center)

Jeremy Mathis, director of the Arctic Research Program for NOAA described his field research in the Arctic region:

“When I started going to the Arctic in 2003, it was a very different environment that it is today. Back in 2003, we were breaking ice everywhere we went, from pretty much starting in the Bering Strait moving all the way up into the study areas north of Alaska and into the central Arctic basin. There was ice that was very thick and it was very extensive. This year in 2017, during a 25-day cruise in the Arctic, we didn’t see a single piece of ice. We were sailing around on a coast guard icebreaker in blue water that could have been anywhere in the world. And it certainly didn’t look like the Arctic.”

CNN: Greenland, Summer 2017. Iceberg fragments floating off the coast.

 

The impact of this change will affect the entire world. As ice melts, less heat is reflected off from Earth’s surface. Sunlight entering the atmosphere will instead be absorbed by thinner darker ice, which accelerates the rate of ice melting even further.

Scientists are pessimistic for the future, observing no end for this trend in sight.

 

 

References

Beitler, J. (2018). Sea ice tracking low in both hemispheres | Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis. [online] Nsidc.org. Available at: http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/2018/02/sea-ice-tracking-low-in-both-hemispheres/ [Accessed 5 Mar. 2018].

CBC (2017). Arctic report card: Permafrost thawing, sea ice melting faster than before. [online] Available at: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/noaa-arctic-report-card-permafrost-thawing-1.4445222 [Accessed 5 Mar. 2018].

Kinnard, C., Zdanowicz, C., Fisher, D., Isaksson, E., de Vernal, A. and Thompson, L. (2011). Reconstructed changes in Arctic sea ice over the past 1,450 years. Nature, [online] 479(7374), pp.509-512. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature10581 [Accessed 5 Mar. 2018].

Smith-Spark, L. (2017). Warmer Arctic temperatures the ‘new normal’. [online] CNN. Available at: https://www.cnn.com/2017/12/13/world/arctic-report-climate-change-intl/index.html [Accessed 5 Mar. 2018].

J. Richter-Menge, J. E. Overland, J. T. Mathis, and E. Osborne, Eds., 2017: Arctic Report Card 2017, http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/Report-Card

 

Image

Are Antidepressants as Effective at Treating Anxiety as Benzodiazepines?

NOTE: due to limitations in WordPress’ ability to display images with high resolution in larger sizes, if you wish to more closely examine a figure, e.g. text in graphs, please right click the figure of interest and click “Open image in new tab”.

The most common psychiatric conditions are anxiety disorders and depressive disorders, with this being especially true for university students. The two medications designed to treat these two disorders are benzodiazepines (BDZ) and antidepressants (AD) for anxiety and depression respectively. However, in addition to depression, almost all antidepressants treat anxiety and many other psychiatric conditions effectively. In the recent years, there has been a shift from doctors prescribing BDZ to AD. If antidepressants do everything that benzodiazepines do, plus more, why are benzodiazepines still prescribed at all?

First, let’s see how these drugs work. Benzodiazepines work by increasing the action of GABA, a neurotransmitter (chemical in the nervous system) that helps the brain calm down. There are many types of antidepressants, including tricyclic antidepressants (TCA; now less commonly prescribed) and reuptake inhibitors (“modern antidepressants”), which generally work by increasing levels of serotonin in the brain, a neurotransmitter that helps regulate mood, leading to enhanced mood. Figure 1 shows some BDZ and AD used in the review this article discusses.

Figure 1: Left to right: alaprazomlam, a benzodiazepine; imipramine, a tricyclic antidepressant; venlafaxine, a selective serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor.

For those interested, the following videos illustrate detailed mechanisms of how BDZ and AD work respectively.

To see if evidence truly supports the shift towards AD from BDZ, researchers reviewed 22 studies comparing BDZ to AD in treating anxiety disorders. To keep variables constant, they compared only results from studies comparing the use of BDZ and TCA to treat panic disorder (a specific type of anxiety disorder), while analyzing the other studies individually. There were 11 such results, and those for which data was provided are summarized in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Response rates to BDZ and AD found by various studies. Data complied by Offidani et al.

The researchers did not find consistent statistically significant results which suggested that AD treat panic disorder more effectively than BDZ. However, in addition, they also compared the adverse events (unpleasant effects caused by medication) of BDZ and AD. Although the number of studies supplying this information was small, they consistently found that adverse events were less frequently reported for BDZ than for AD (Figure 3), and statistical analysis revealed a significant difference.

Figure 3: Adverse events caused by BDZ and AD. Data complied by Offidani et al.

Furthermore, the researchers also compared the dropout rates for the studies (which all 11 studies reported). This is the percentage of participants who, for one reason or another, chose to discontinue participation in the study. While this does not necessarily indicate that the medication is not working properly or has adverse effects, the researchers did find that BDZ dropout rates were significantly lower than those of AD (Figure 4).

Figure 4: Dropout rates of participants using BDZ and AD. Data complied by Offidani et al.

There were only 3 studies comparing modern antidepressants to BDZ. After analyzing the data, the researchers found no significant difference in response rate between the two groups, but they found similar results for adverse events and dropout rates.

While antidepressants are undoubtedly effective at treating both depression and anxiety, there is little evidence that they treat anxiety better than benzodiazepines. That being said, benzodiazepines seem to have fewer unpleasant side effects, and therefore should still have their place in modern day medicine if anxiety alone is the issue.

-Cliff Ng

References

Schacter, D. L.; Gilbert, D. T.; Nock, M.; Wegner, D. M. Psychology, 3rd ed.; Worth Publishers, Macmillan Learning: New York, NY, 2014.

Offidani, E.; Guidi, J.; Tomba, E.; Fava, G. A. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 201382(6), 355–362.

Offidani, E.; Guidi, J.; Tomba, E.; Fava, G. A. Supplementary Material for: Efficacy and Tolerability of Benzodiazepines versus Antidepressants in Anxiety Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2013.

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed.; American Psychiatric Publishing: Washington, 2014.

Adverse Events, Near Misses, and Errors https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primers/primer/34/adverse-events-near-misses-and-errors (accessed Feb 24, 2018).

Reality Check: Mozart Effect vs. Science

Rausher, Shaw and Ky‘s 1993 paper in Nature, showing correlation of increase cognitive function and exposure to Mozart’s piano music, triggered a worldwide interest in developing new technology to improve learning.   Government and private corporations invested large sums of money to develop Mozart-based learning tools to improve the intelligence of students.

Rausher et. al original study recruited college students to partake in a standardized cognitive test that extrapolated to an IQ score.  Students were allowed to complete the test in one of three conditions that were assigned to them: with Mozart’s Sonata in D major, K 448 playing, with relaxing music playing in background, in silence.  Rausher’s data (Fig. 1) astonished the world, when students completing the test with Mozart’s sonata playing were found to have a higher IQ score than those under the other conditions.

Data first appeared in the paper, re-presented in graph form for clarity.

Critics of Rausher questioned the validity of the data collected in the study.  Kenneth Steele of Applachian State University questioned effects of bias due to the small sample size of the initial study and indirect comparison to a control group on the data.   Steele et al. adapted Rausher et al.‘s methodology to study changes in the cognitive performance college students when exposed to music by Mozart, Phillip Glass (minimalist music empirically shown to have opposite effect of Mozart’s music) and silence.  Steele et al. tested all participants before (pre-treatment) and after/during (post-treatment) exposure (Fig. 2) and found no significant difference between improvements in the scores of students exposed to Mozart, in comparison to the other groups.

Graph created from data presented in Steel et al.’s 1999 paper

Whether or not Mozart’s music can increase cognitive performance remains actively debated in scholarly communications, where Rausher and Steele have both continued to publish articles arguing for and against the existence of the Mozart effect.   Elsewhere, Rausher et al.‘s 1993 study has inspired applications of Mozart’s music in patients with epilepsy    Considering that the original music inspiring this research is over 220 years old, who knows what the future applications of Mozart’s masterpieces might be.

Aydan Con

PS: I don’t have permission to use a recording of the above mentioned Mozart Sonata, and my own recording of the work is not available at the time of this blog.  Instead, I have posted a performance of another work associated with the Mozart Effect, Piano Concerto in A major, K. 488.  The performance is by pianist Natalie Lo (BMus ’16) with the UBC Symphony Orchestra conducted by Dr. Jonathan Girard (used with permission).