Category Archives: Energy

Human Augmentation: Salvation or Destruction?

With the emergence of technologies such as gene therapy, neural implants and brain-computer interfaces; one can only imagine, how far can we push the human body?

DNA. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

According to a report done by The National Intelligence Council, exoskeletons offer improved functionality over human limbs; allowing workers to carry increased loads without physical burden. Future neural implants could possibly link human brains to computers leading to enhanced “superhuman” abilities (think permanent photographic memory!)

However, not everyone believes in augmentation…

A movement called Bioconservatism challenges the idea of radical technological advancement in the basis that it destroys human dignity. According to them, should these augmentations come to fruition, they bring a problem that could change human society forever. This quote shows a Bioconservative sharing his testimony:

“It undermines our self – conception as free, thoughtful, responsible beings, worthy of respect because we alone among the animals have minds and hearts that aim far higher than the mere perpetuation of our genes.” – Leon Kass

Anti-Transhumanism. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

The National Intelligence Council predicts that only the rich could purchase these augmentations due to their enormous costs. Which may create a divide between enhanced and non-enhanced individuals leading to a two-tiered society.

In fact, our daily lives would definitely change! Individuals with hearing or sight augmentations could invade our privacy and use our information for their own benefit. I guess annoying phone calls from telemarketers would stop (that’s great!), but instead they could just access your mind! (not so great!)

Our current technology prevents us from venturing further into human augmentation, as it cannot support these futuristic designs. For example, the battery life in exoskeletons doesn’t last long enough for practical use in work settings. Not to mention, malicious individuals could easily hack augmentations as this technology still remains in its infancy stage.

US Army Exoskeleton Prototype. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

While Bioconservatives disapprove of human augmentation, another movement called Transhumanism supports the change and believes that humans can evolve beyond our current physical and scientific limitations. A quote from a famous body artist states his opinion:

“The question is not whether a society will allow freedom to express yourself, but whether the human species will allow you to break the bonds of your genetic parameters” – Stelarc

Beyond philosophical ideas, the military sees human augmentation as the future of warfare. Researchers seek to develop retinal implants that offer night vision, neural implants that give improved cognitive ability (such as increased concentration) and augmented reality devices that enhance situational awareness of soldiers in battle.

In the future, we might see a real life Captain America or even an actual Terminator! (Excited?… maybe not)

In this day and age, if someone wants to change their physical appearance, services such as plastic surgery already exist. In my opinion, the individual should have the choice if they want to augment themselves.

I wouldn’t mind getting a bionic arm actually…

 

The Truth Behind Aspartame

Sugar vs. Aspartame (artificial sweetener): if you were to ask anyone which of the two they think is the healthier alternative, the majority of people would say the latter. Is that really the case, or is the negative connotation associated with “sugar” masking the truth?

Common Sweetener Packets. (Image from Evan-Amos [Public domain], Wikimedia Commons)

For years people have been trying to cut down on their sugar intake and have been looking for a healthier alternative. For some, they miss and crave the sweet taste of sugar because their body is unable to properly regulate it. As a result, many of these people have found their solution in artificial and natural sweeteners. One of the most successful and controversial artificial sweeteners, aspartame, has especially sparked the interest of many. Is it better or worse than its sugar counterpart?

Over the last couple of decades, many claims have stated that aspartame increases the risk or is a cause of the following: headaches, dizziness, or depression. A 2007 study showed a link between cancer and aspartame in rats. Ironically, links to long-term weight gain have also been tied to aspartame intake.

On the other hand, Aspartame has been deemed safe for consumption up to 50 mg per kg of body weight, even in pregnant women and children. It is also a safe alternative for people with diabetes who cannot consume high sugar levels.

Sweeteners are substituted for sugar in many popular soft drinks. (Image from The Hits)

Comparing the pros and cons, aspartame looks to have some bad effects, but they can only be speculated, and has no real scientific basis to prove or disprove these claims. On the other hand, aspartame has been scientifically proven to be safe for consumption.

There are too many reasons to list why lots of sugar intake is bad for you.  Therefore, I am all for the switch to sweeteners like aspartame instead of sugar.

 

 

 

Personal choices in diet that have a significant impact on global warming and climate change.

Vegetarian diets are not only healthy for people, but for the planet also! M. Sanjayan, CEO of Conservation International, among various scientist’s state that a reduction of meat consumption in our diets have a significant impact on global warming, since about 25% of climate change is attributed to food and the choices we make, according to the UN IPCC fifth assessment report, 2014.

Climate change raises concerns internationally, it is the crisis of the 21st century that could lead to disastrous consequences in the future. Therefore, international community constantly collaborates to mitigate green house gas emissions (GHG emissions), These are gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) that their presence essentially causes global warming.

Which gases are green house gasses and what does their chemical structure look like. Courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech

A brief explanation of how green house gasses affect global warming. Courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech

The last important agreement was the Paris accords in November of 2016, where government officials stated to reduce 55% of GHG emissions. Climate change is an overwhelming issue and people might think that to solve this problem, the choice remains within government officials and multinational companies. But there is something we can do to tackle climate change.

Scientists like Ben Houlton from UC Davis says that people’s dietary choices, have an impact on climate change, specifically when consuming meat. Reducing meat consumption or switching from red meats, like beef and pork, to poultry and fish are great ways to reduce GHG emissions and help save the planet.

Say for example, that juicy serving of beef that you crave at a good summer barbecue, that steak alone takes on average 330g of CO2 to produce. That is the same emission a car would give off by driving for 3 miles. Deciding to switch that serving of beef for chicken reduces carbon emissions 6-fold, because chicken meat produces 52g of CO2 average. Switching for a fish or vegetable serving instead, reduces the carbon impact substantially.

According to the UN FAO, 2013 and UN IPCC, 2014, livestock and transportation contribute equally to climate change by producing equal GHG emissions. This is because livestock such as cows, pigs, lamb and chickens etc. produce significant amounts of methane (CH4).

Animals give off methane through their excrement and flatulence, animals in general are gassy! Why do animals produce methane? Because it results from chemical reactions when breaking down food, even humans produce methane. The issue with methane is, that it is 25 times more potent than carbon dioxide according to M. Sanjayan.

relative emissions of CO2 in livestock. Cattle are the main contributor to the sector’s emissions with about 5.0 gigatonnes CO2-eq, which represents about 62 percent of sector’s emissions. -Courtesy of FAO

There are several other indirect factors harming the planet, that are caused by meat consumption. For example, livestock agriculture promotes deforestation, because it takes space to raise livestock, leading to land clearance. This means double trouble, on one hand we increase GHG emissions by raising more animals, and on the other we cut down trees that help fight global warming by converting CO2 to oxygen by photosynthesis.

The Consequences of going entirely vegetarian. (Blog 3C)

However, meat reduction doesn’t seem to benefit Canada and could be a threat to the life style of many full-time hard-working Canadians. In Context, Canada is one of the strongest exporters of red meat in the world.  In 2017 the beef cattle industry contributed $17.2 billion to Canadian GDP, providing an amazing economic contribution.

Also, the dairy sector sustains 215,000 full-time equivalent jobs in rural communities and contributes to $18.9B to Canada’s GDP. It is the top 2 agricultural commodities in 7 out of the 10 provinces. Therefore livestock is an important industry for the country!

          Livestock in Canada is an ideal resource to exploit, because much of Canada’s land is not suitable for crops due to the terrain, soil nutrients and weather. Only 7.3% of the country’s total land is agricultural. Therefore, livestock is the best way to make use of the land that can’t afford any vegetable products. It raises the question, what happens to the farmers since they cannot transition to growing vegetables with the same land? Do they lose their jobs without a solution?

          Since losing an important economic contributor would decrease government economic resources, other government funded programs like health care, retirement, research and many more would suffer. Lowering the quality of life then becomes a nation-wide problem.

          Personally, I believe we could all benefit from reducing our meat consumption. Our current food systems could benefit by diversifying from monoculture and heavy livestock tendencies. However, it is undeniable that our lives in Canada are significantly dependent on the livestock industry in several ways. Canada is a resource-based country and much of our wealth unfortunately comes from exploiting resources. Balance always seems to be key, not everyone should become vegan at once, but also, don’t have a cow! Be mindful with what you eat.

For a detailed summary and more information check out this video made with M. Sanjayan!

link to blog post 1

https://blogs.ubc.ca/communicatingchemistry2018w110/2018/10/29/farming-and-climate-organic-or-bust/#comment-46

link to blog post 2

https://blogs.ubc.ca/communicatingchemistry2018w110/2018/10/29/you-spend-more-time-on-social-media-when-you-feel-more-stressed/#comment-47

 

BLOG 3C COMMENTS

https://blogs.ubc.ca/communicatingchemistry2018w110/2018/10/31/to-vape-or-not-to-vape/#comment-85

https://blogs.ubc.ca/communicatingchemistry2018w110/2018/11/05/one-pill-to-cure-them-all/#comment-86

 

Should Some Breads be Age Restricted?

What if I were to tell you that every time you had consumed bread from a bakery, you were also consuming alcohol as well?

Although it is not recent news, a common way for bakers to create loaves of bread is to add yeast into their dough to make it rise. This idea comes from a famous french chemist named Louis Pasteur, who discovered the process of fermentation in 1857. In this process however, ethanol (the type of alcohol found in beer and other alcoholic beverages) is produced as a product. Is bread really safe to eat without the feeling of intoxication?

The short answer: Yes.

The process of fermentation involves converting one molecule of glucose into two molecules of both ethanol and carbon dioxide in the absence of oxygen.

The Process of Ethanol Fermentation

According to chemical engineer/data scientist Josh Velson,

“However, during the baking process, most of the alcohol in the dough evaporates into the atmosphere. This is basically the same thing that happens to much of the water in the dough as well.”

So no worries, bread is perfectly fine to eat. If bread is one of your favourite things to eat like me, this feeling of relief is the best thing since sliced bread.