Category Archives: Popular Science

Assemble Sugars with the Assistance of a “Secret Weapon”—Enzyme

People eat sugar every day, but do you know scientists can make whatever types of sugar they want? A group of researchers led by Dr Stephen Withers from the University of Columbia found an efficient method for creating new sugars. They selected a powerful type of biological catalyst called enzymes, which can assemble certain types of sugar molecules faster and cleaner than other chemical catalysts. This method has potential applications in drug development for diseases such as diabetes and obesity.

Sugars are referred to as a type of molecules that consist of units of hydrocarbons assembled in a long chain. The picture below shows various sugar molecules. Each hexagon represents a sugar unit, and different sugars have different numbers of units. Sugars with only one unit are called monosaccharides. Glucose and fructose are common monosaccharides. Our table sugar has one glucose combined with one fructose and is called disaccharide (of course!). Polysaccharides consist of starch, cellulose, and glycogen (sugar stored in your body). Sugars also exist on the cell surface and act as the receptor for many drug molecules. Therefore, knowing the properties of different sugars and how to synthesize them is an essential topic in modern biology and chemistry.

Figure 1. Sugar in daily life vs. Sugar in chemistry

Despite sugars are important to human, making the desired type of sugar molecules is a tricky problem. The reason is that many sugar units have a unique geometry. To maintain the biological functions of sugars, we also need to keep its original shape. Most of the synthetic chemical methods can assemble the sugar unit in the desired order, but cannot retain the geometry. To solve this problem, Withers and his group decided to use a “secret weapon” in biology—enzymes.

Enzymes are a special type of proteins widely existing in all organisms. They can accelerate the chemical reactions in our body and sustain normal metabolic processes. More importantly, enzymes are highly specific to particular sugar geometry. In other words, they only react with sugars that fit their structures and yield product that also has one specific structure. The type of enzymes accelerates sugar assembly is called glycosynthase, and the type accelerates disassembly is called glycoside hydrolase. Now, using enzymes seem to be promising, but where to find the enzymes we want?

To find the desired enzyme more quickly, scientists used a technique called metagenomics which allows them to sample the genes of millions of microorganisms without the need for individual culture. Instead of directly searching for enzymes that can link the sugar together, the first step is to find enzymes (glycoside hydrolase) which break sugar bond (Surprise!). Researchers used bacteria as factories to produce the enzymes and collect them together. Of course, we want enzyme glycosynthase that LINK sugar bonds. The next step is to reconstruct those enzymes such that they can assemble the sugar correctly. Researchers change the reaction centre of the glycoside hydrolase by muting some of the critical structures. By doing so, some of the glycoside hydrolases betrayed their original duties and started to assemble the sugar unit. Figure 2 shows the overall procedures for the experiment.

Abstract Image

Figure 2. Experimental procedure. Sugars are shown as chair-like hexagons. The aim is to link the sugars to various substrate molecules (shown in different colours).

Eventually, Withers and his group found eight types of enzymes that are specific to the assembly of different sugar molecules, which is almost impossible using traditional methods. As discussed before, sugars construct the receptors for drug and other signal molecules in our body. Understanding how to synthesize sugar will help scientists build new medicines targeted to specific body cells. Diseases such as diabetes and obesity that are related to sugars will also be better understood in the future.

Reference:

Armstrong, Z.; Liu, F.; Chen, H.-M.; Hallam, S. J.; Withers, S. G. Systematic Screening of Synthetic Gene-Encoded Enzymes for Synthesis of Modified Glycosides. ACS Catalysis 2019, 9 (4), 3219–3227.

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acscatal.8b05179

Eat with your… Environment?

We have all heard about eating with our eyes first, but no one ever talks about how our environment affects our meals. Mother Nature Network (MNN) indicate that your environment plays big factor in your perception of food. Whether it’s lighting, furniture, or noise, they all play a role.

Figure 1 – Chocolate Ice Cream Retrived from: HandletheHeat

This study published in October 2019 explored temporal changes in how chocolate ice cream was perceived when eaten at different locations. Each participant had their electrophysisological properties, emotions, and temporal changes in flavour monitored, with 5 minute breaks inbetween each measurement. The participants were randomly assigned different environments such as a university study area, a bus stop, a cafe, or a sensory testing laboratory.

Figure 2 – The 4 locations in which tests were conducted. A – Sensory testing laboratory B – University study area C – Bus stop D – Cafe Retrieved from: Figure 2 of Xu et al.

Electrophysiological Responses

3 electrophysiological responses were measured, including skin conductance (SC), blood volume pulse (BVP), and heart rate (HR). They found that SC and HR was significantly influenced by different environments. Using the Tukey-Kramer test, they found that eating chocolate ice cream in the study space compared to the laboratory significantly increases SC (F(3,156) = 3.149, p < 0.05). Furthermore, the HR was significantly lower after consumption in the study area compared to a bus stop (F(3,156) = 2.673, p < 0.05).

Figure 3 – Electrophysiological response measurements. n= 160 (50 males/110 females) Retrieved from: Figure 10 Xu et al.

Emotional Response

In a pilot study, the emotional responses were reported among 97 individuals. Positive emotions were noted such as happiness, cheerfulness, and joy. In addition, negative emotions were noted as well, such as tenseness, unhappiness, and anxiousness. Using a Cochran Q-test, they found that a significant number of negative emotions were associated with the bus stop compared to the other 3 environments. Furthermore, a significant number of positive emotions were expressed after consuming chocolate ice cream at a cafe or university compared to a bus stop.

Figure 4 – Both positive and negative emotions associated with eating chocolate ice cream in 4 different environments. Data adapted from: Xu et al.

Taste

The dominance of different attributes were measured and converted to a percentage of time it spent as a dominant factor. Sweetness the dominant attribute across all environments (46% lab, 33% university, 48% cafe, 38% bus stop). Interestingly, the dominance of sweetness subsided overtime, and other attributes became dominant. Other factors such as creaminess, roastedness, and bitterness was noted as well. At the bus stop, bitterness became the most dominant factor after sweetness, while the other 3 locations reported either creaminess, cocoa, or vanilla flavours were dominant.

How do I improve my next meal?

Next time you’re at the dinner table, try some of these tricks to improve the taste of your meal. By listening to higher pitched music, sour and sweet flavours are highlighted, while lower pitched music enhances bitter flavours. Even something as simple as the way food is arranged on the plate will impact its flavour.

-Jackson Kuan

The Power of Acceptance

When life throws us curveballs, we’re often told to hit them out of the park. However, in a recent study, researchers at Yale University found that when individuals were presented with negative stimuli, those who merely accepted their situations experienced less pain and unpleasant emotion than those who reacted naturally to the stimuli.

First, the researchers introduced participants to the concept of mindfulness, which practices the acceptance of a situation. Then, participants were placed in two different groups: one subject to high heat on the forearm, and the other subject to negative images.

Through brain scans, the team observed that participants who practiced mindfulness had reduced activity in regions of the brain concomitant to pain response and negative emotion upon stimuli compared to those who reacted. Furthermore, the participants self-reported that they experienced significantly less negative affects when they accepted their situations.

Figure 1. Participants (n=16) experienced more negative affects upon seeing negative vs. neutral images (a), and upon feeling hot vs. warm temperatures (b) when they chose to react instead of accepting. The * indicates p<0.05, *** indicates p<0.0001, and error bars indicate standard error. (Credits: Kober et al. (2020))

Mindfulness is already practiced by patients suffering from chronic pain and depression, but these findings show the power that acceptance has even on individuals who have never meditated, and the team believes that mindfulness is a good way to temporarily regulate the intensity of pain and negative emotions.

HOW DOES MINDFULNESS WORK?

Scientists are still unsure of how meditation elicits responses in the brain; perhaps mindfulness allows us to feel more in control of our circumstances when we’re having negative experiences, or it reminds us that we have enough strength to make it through whatever. Nonetheless with this technique added to our repertoire, the next time life throws us a curveball we will be more prepared to deal with it.

-Athena Wang

Microwave misconceptions: What actually happens when food is heated?

There are several misconceptions regarding microwave ovens, many of which are simply not true. In fact, one of the most abstract claims made about microwaves is that they can cause cancer. As scientists, we understand that this is not the case. Microwave ovens exploit high wavelength radiation at the lower energy region of the electromagnetic spectrum, which is not particularly dangerous. It is thus important to dispel some of the misconceptions regarding microwave ovens, especially the myths about radioactivity and poor protection.

SEATTLE, WA – SEPTEMBER 20: An “Amazonbasics Microwave,” which can be controlled by Alexa, is pictured at Amazon Headquarters shortly after being launched, on September 20, 2018, in Seattle Washington. Amazon launched more than 70 Alexa-enable products during the event. (Photo by Stephen Brashear/Getty Images)

Radioactive species are not generated in a microwave oven

Radioactivity involves the emission of radiation from spontaneous decay of unstable atomic nuclei. Energy is lost through the release of elementary particles, such as gamma-ray photons, from the nucleus or from electron shells as x-rays. Fortunately, microwave ovens do not release these high energy species, nor do they produce such high energy species. Most microwaves use a magnetron to generate either pulsed or continuous microwaves. In the magnetron, beams of electrons are made to follow curved trajectories, in vacuum tubes, through the combination of electric and magnetic fields. The consumer microwave magnetron emits 2.45 GHz microwaves. This frequency is quite low, which corresponds to low energy. What this means is microwaves do not have enough energy to remove electrons from the food being heated. What they will do is generate heat by inducing molecular vibrations, breaking hydrogen bonds, and allowing for ionic migration of free salts in an electric field.

Microwave ovens are well protected

While the microwave door might seem simple, it is actually inherently complicated. Many different components are used to form the protective door. One of those pieces is known as a choke. In a study conducted by Kusama et al., it was found that the structure of the choke derived in a finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) analysis was very similar to the experimentally designed choke structure. This structure was also found to obtain the maximum shielding effect. While there were many parameters and factors, they assessed the metal lengths (S1 and S2) and the angle (theta). They calculated the radiation power P2 exiting the choke by changing the three previously mentioned parameters. One rather interesting finding from their paper was the effect of the angle on the shielding. This portion was conducted at fixed metal lengths of 4.00 mm and 9.01mm for S1 and S2 respectively.

Angle (theta)[Deg] 0 15.52 26.56 33.69 45.00 56.31 63.40 70.56 90
Approximate Shielding effect [dB] 21 18 27 35 29 22 18 17 16

From the data, it is evident that the shielding length changed with the angle, and the optimum angle was found to be 33.69o. This theoretical structure (S1 4 mm, S2 9.01 mm,  33.69o) was found to resemble the empirical structure, and thus the choke has been designed shield effectively. Hence, the choke and other components, which reflect microwave radiation, provide apt protection and prevent the release.

Don’t believe everything you read online; Microwaves are safe. Let me know what your opinions are in the comments.

Vaccination and Herd Immunity

Herd immunity is often generated through vaccination or widespread infection. For the current Covid-19 pandemic, many scientists and experts advocate social distancing to avoid overwhelming hospitals while buying more time for the inventions of vaccines and treatments. Why is vaccination favored by scientists and medical experts than a widespread infection? How is herd immunity achieved through vaccination?

What is herd immunity?

Herd immunity refers to a means of protecting a whole community from disease by immunizing a critical portion of its populace. Vaccination protects the vaccinated person but also the people who are not immunized. However, to achieve herd immunity, we need a certain percentage of people in a community to be vaccinated.

Herd immunity, the result of a high immunization rate. Source: The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID)

To reach the herd immunity threshold, different vaccination coverages which depend on the basic reproduction number (Ro) are required. Vaccination coverage is the estimated percentage of people who have received specific vaccines. For example, measles, a highly contagious virus, has a Ro value between 12 and 18. This high Ro value calls for a high vaccine coverage which is 92-94%. In other words, to reach the herd immunity threshold, at least 92% of the population needs to be vaccinated.

The higher the vaccine coverage the better…

Does it mean that measles will die out as long as 92% of the population is vaccinated against measles? The answer is no. Dr. Plans-Rubio, an epidemiology expert in Europe, found a significant negative correlation (P<0.05) between the incidence of measles in 2017–2018 in different countries of the European Union and measles vaccination coverage with herd immunity levels in the target measles vaccination population during 2015–2017. According to Dr. Plans-Rubio, low percentages of measles vaccination coverage with two doses of vaccine and the resulting low herd immunity levels explained measles incidence and persistence of measles in the European Union in 2017-2018. To eliminate the measles virus in the European Union, W.H.O must improve routine measles vaccination coverage and conduct supplementary measles vaccination campaigns.

Linear correlation coefficient p
Coverage with two doses of measles vaccine − 0.533 0.003
Coverage with one dose of measles vaccine 0.523 0.004
Coverage with first dose of measles vaccine − 0.332 0.079
Coverage with second dose of measles vaccine − 0.559 0.002
Prevalence of individuals with vaccine-induced measles protection (Iv) − 0.580 0.001
Herd immunity gap (94.5 − Iv)a − 0.580 0.001

(Table source: European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases)

Relating to Covid-19 pandemic

Without measles vaccines, we would not have lowered the mortality rate of measles and reached herd immunity in most countries. The novel coronavirus, similar to measles, is also contagious. To lower the mortality rate of Covid-19 and reach herd immunity, the corresponding vaccine is required. Hence, every single one of us should practice social distancing to avoid overwhelming our healthcare system while scientists strive to invent the corresponding vaccine.

 

Reference:

Plans-Rubio Pedro. Low percentages of measles vaccination coverage with two doses of vaccine and low herd immunity levels explain measles incidence and persistence of measles in the European Union in 2017–2018. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2019; 38, 1719-1729. DOI: https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/article/10.1007%2Fs10096-019-03604-0#Sec2

-Pricia

“The Crow and the Pitcher” and Close Packing of Equal Spheres

 The Crow and the Pitcher

The Crow and the Pitcher is one of Aesop’s Fables, which tells a story of: A thirsty Crow found a high and narrow-neck pitcher with a little water in it, the crow could not reach the water no matter how it tried. Suddenly, the crow came up with an idea: picking up some small rocks and dropping them to the pitcher. With each pebble, the water rose higher and higher. Finally, the crow drank the water.

The Crow and the Pitcher, Aesop’s Fables. (Copyright: Milo Winter)

This story is very inspiring to many children, it told them to think flexibly when facing problems. However, is it possible for the crow to drink the water with rocks in real life?

Close Packing of Equal Spheres

The problem in the Crow and the Pitcher is that after the crow dropped rocks to the flask, the water filled the space between rocks first, then it raised the height of water. How much water was needed to fill the space between rocks, this is the closest packing problem.

The Close Packing of Equal Spheres was first put forwarded by Kepler in the 17th-century. Kepler thought that the close packing of equal spheres in a three-dimensional space looks like the following:

The cannonball stack: an “FCC” latice. (Copyright: Wikipedia)

The close packing of equal spheres can be widely found in chemistry, such as crystal structures of Magnesium and Copper atoms. It was calculated by Carl Friedrich Gauss that the greatest fraction of space occupied by spheres – that can be achieved by close packing of equal spheres is 74%. In other words, if the water in the pitcher is 26% (volume) or less, the crow cannot drink the water no matter how many rocks it put in the pitcher.

The close packing of equal spheres also called the Hexagonal Close Packing. In 2017, the scientist proved that the Hexagonal Close Packing is the densest arrangement in the three-dimensional space.

 How can the crow drink the water in the pitcher? 

Is there a way that the crow can drink the water in the pitcher without 26% of water? Mathematicians said that by combining the truncated octahedrons, tetrahedrons and octahedrons (2:1), or truncated cubes and octahedrons (1:1), or gossip mirrors and truncated cuboctahedrons (3:1), the crow can easily drink all the water in the pitcher.

Alternative ways for the crow to drink water in the pitcher. (Copyright: ScienceDirect)

If it is hard for the crow to find the above rocks, it can also combine multiple shapes of rocks to get the water in the pitcher. Moreover, some scientists tested the effect of shapes of flasks on the increasing heights of water in flasks by using the Close packing of equal spheres. They found that the height of water in Erlenmeyer-flask-shaped flasks has the fastest increase. However, where can you find an Erlenmeyer flask? -A chemistry lab. It’s absolutely a bad idea to drink solutions in a chemistry lab.

Biodegradable, what does it really mean?

Plastic pollution is one of the major issues effecting the marine environment today.

A study published on February 13 2015 by Science investigated the input of plastic into the oceans from land. Using worldwide data, the study estimated that 192 coastal countries generated 275 million metric tons (MT) of plastic waste in 2010 alone, with 4.8-12.7 million MT of that waste entering the ocean.

Marine debris that was washed ashore covers a beach on Laysan Island in the Hawaiian Islands National Wildlife Refuge. (Susan White/USFWS)

What is bioplastic?

Bioplastics are plastics that are partially made of biological materials like wheat, maize, and tapioca.  Being made of biological material does not mean that bioplastics can be broken down by fungi and bacteria. Essentially, being bioplastic does not necessarily mean that the material is truly biodegradable.

Examples of non-biodegradable bioplastics include bio-based Polyethylene terephthalate and Polyethylene which make up everyday items such as bottles and carry bags.

There are bioplastics that can degrade in the environment, given specific conditions. For example, Kale et al. published a study in 2007 that investigated the biodegradation of polylactide bottles. The study found these bottles degrade after 30 days when buried in soil, at relatively high temperatures.

What is biodegradable plastic?

The definition of biodegradable is the break down of substances into inorganic materials, such as water and oxygen.

“This word ‘biodegradable’ has become very attractive to people trying to make quick bucks on it,” explains Ramani Narayan, a professor of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering at Michigan State University, who helped develop biodegradable corn-based plastic.

Typically, companies make plastics that degrade into smaller particles faster and then claim that they are ‘biodegradable’ says Narayan. Figure 2 shows the relative rates of degradation of various materials. Even though they are claimed to be biodegradable, they still take large amounts of time to degrade into smaller particles – which are no better for the environment.

Figure 2: Image depicting the relative rates of degradation for various materials. Obtained from creative commons.

Why does this matter?

The general public does not know the difference between bioplastics and biodegradable plastics. They also do not know that companies use the term ‘biodegradable’ lightly – and just because plastics claim to be biodegradable does not mean they actually are. This would cause people to assume that using and disposing of bio- and biodegradable plastics is safe for the environment, when that is not the case.

This discarded plastic would eventually find its way into the ocean, further increasing the plastic pollution in the marine environment. Plastic debris in the ocean is known to increase the rate of ingestion, suffocation and entanglement of hundreds of marine species – often resulting in death.

It is important to know the distinction between bio- and biodegradable when using plastics, such that they can be disposed/recycled in the appropriate manner.

The easiest solution would be to minimize your plastic use entirely, to reduce the rate of plastics entering the ocean and reduce the endangering of wildlife.

 

-Chantell Jansz

New method found to build artificial blood vessels!

Figure1, yellow: Number of People died on the kidney transplant waitlist, blue: Number of people removed from the waitlist classified as “too sick”. Source

 

As the research shows, there are more than 114000 people in the United State on the waiting list of life-saving organ transplants. On average, there will be one new name added to the list every ten minutes, and 20 people die because of the lack of available organs every day. Research team from the University of Minnesota Medical School has published their new founding in Nature Biotechnology on March 11st, 2020. Their research proved the possibility to build artificial blood vessels in a pig, which has the potential to provide ultimate blood vessels for human organ transplants.

How did they come up with the idea?

“There is so many chronic and terminal diseases, and many people are not able to participate in organ transplantation,” said Daniel, a cardiologist who accepted heart transplantation before, “About 98 percent of people are not going to be eligible for a heart transplant, so there’s been a huge effort in trying to come up with strategies to increase the donor pool. Our approach looked at a pig.” Due to the physiological similarity between human and pigs, scientists have done similar studies of using pig insulin to treat human diabetes. These historical researches give scientists confidence and also an existing platform to study.

What is the benefit of choosing pigs?

Figure 2:Acute rejection Anti-CD3 Donor DC. Source

Transplant rejection is a process of transplanted tissue rejected by the recipient’s immune system. According to the research done previously, there are 50-80% of patients would have at least one rejection episode. This symptom is due to recipient’s body cannot adapt to a “foreign” tissue and the immune system would fight against the transplanted tissue. Transplant rejection always causes severe consequences, and a lot of patients would have to remove the tissue immediately.

Daniel Garry, the leader of the research team came up with an idea to avoid transplant rejection. They took mature cells scraped off from a patient’s skin, reprogram these cells and eventually inject them into a pig embryo. This process would develop patient’s own genetic information in pig’s body. Thus, patients will get their own “blood vessels” which can greatly avoid transplant rejection. Mary, coworker of Garry said: “These blood vessels would be engineered and could be utilized in these patients to prevent those kinds of life-long handicaps, if you will.”

The first phase of their study has been approved by the University of Minnesota’s Stem Cell Research Oversight committee. “While it is a first phase, there’s pretty solid proof of concept,” Mary said. “We believe that we’ve proven that there’s no off-target effects of these cells, so we’re ready to move forward to later gestational stages.” This study will eventually benefit millions of people who are suffering from transplantation surgery. Also, this study shines lights and give hopes to modern organ transplantation studies.

-Vicky Gu

What is N95? ——The knowledge about face masks

Facing the outbreak of the new coronavirus, all kinds of face masks were sold out in the blink of an eye. More and more people seem to start to realize the importance of face masks.  But, do face masks really work? and how they work?

The answer largely depends on what type of face mask you are wearing.

Classification of Face Masks

According to the design of the face masks, the general ranking of the protective ability is (high to low): N95 masks> surgical masks> ordinary medical masks> ordinary cotton masks. But in the case of the new coronavirus, the most effective type of face masks are medical-surgical masks and masks filtering 95% or more of non-oily particles, such as N95, KN95, DS2, FFP2, etc. At present, China’s medical face masks are mainly divided into three types: medical protective masks with the highest protection level, medical-surgical masks commonly used in invasive operating environments such as operating rooms, and ordinary disposable medical masks.

 

How Face Masks Work?

Usually, medical face masks are made of non-woven fabrics, and its raw materials are mainly Polypropylene. And polypropylene layers are arranged to form an SMS structure.

SMS structure makes face masks capable to block floating particles while allowing airflow in and out the face masks. In this structure, the key material that brings the virus filtering effect is a high density, electrostatic layer lies in the middle: melt-blown non-woven fabric. When small particles like viruses get close to the melt-blown nonwoven fabric, it will be immediately captured by the electrostatic field and adsorbed on the surface of the non-woven fabric, and therefore prevent the virus gets into the body.
Yicheng Zhu

Revolution of Orthopedic Surgery – Bioactive Glass Composite Pore-forming Strategy

The use of adhesives to replace traditional invasive internal fixation tools (such as steel plates and nails) will revolutionize orthopedic surgery. The ideal bone cement should be able to immediately fix the fracture site, while providing a space and microenvironment suitable for bone cell growth and promoting fracture healing.

Cyanoacrylate (commonly known as universal glue) is currently the only medical glue with excellent instant adhesive strength and biocompatibility, but its polymerization product is non-degradable and cannot support the growth of new bone tissue through the adhesive layer, which hinders Because of bone healing, it cannot yet be used as a bone cement.

Recently, with the support of the Ministry of Science and Technology, the National Natural Science Foundation of China, and the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qiu Dong’s group at the has proposed a bioactive glass composite pore-forming strategy to help cyanoacrylate bonding Agents are used for internal fixation of fractures to promote fracture healing. Bioactive glass has excellent osteoconductivity, osteoinduction, and can promote the regeneration of bone tissue.

To prove that the bioactive pore‐forming adhesive is not only strong and instant bonded but also facilitates cell ingrowth and displays excellent bioactivity, they conducted bone‐fracture healing experiments. In the experiment, the bioactive pore‐forming adhesive (PSC1/PEG4/OCA5) was compared with commercial adhesive (OCA) and pore‐forming adhesive (PEG5/OCA5) by applying all to a circular bone piece which was fixed within freshly formed cranial fractures in a group of mice.

Figure 1. The scheme of a mouse cranial fracture with the craniotomy location (Source)

The stability of the circular bone piece and bone healing effect were evaluated at 12 weeks post‐operation. The ratio of bone volume (BV) within the circular gap over the total volume (TV) within the circular gap was quantified as shown in the figure 2 below. After 12 weeks, BV/TV of the PSC1/PEG4/OCA5 group was 0.76 ± 0.06, which was significantly higher than that of the PEG5/OCA5 group (0.47 ± 0.10), the OCA group (0.40 ± 0.06), and the group with no adhesive treatment (0.26 ± 0.05). These findings supported that the adhesive with pores for bone ingrowth was crucial for new bone formation.

Figure 2. quantitative analysis of new bone formation (Source)

ARS (Alizarin Red S) can detect calcium which is a characteristic evidence to bone‐like structures. As shown in Figure 3, the Ca content in the bioactive pore‐forming adhesive (OD = 0.084 ± 0.008) was around two-fold higher than those in the merely pore‐forming adhesive (OD = 0.046 ± 0.004) and CA adhesive (OD = 0.041 ± 0.001). As a result, these findings were consistent with the statement that the PSC BG can promote osteogenic differentiation that is of importance for bone regeneration.

Figure 3. The optical density of eluents from ARS‐stained adhesives (Source)

The bioactive bone cement has good clinical transformation prospects and can provide new ideas and methods for clinical fracture treatment. At the same time, the above-mentioned composite pore-forming strategy can also be used for substances other than bioactive glass to increase matrix materials and functions. Material compatibility.

 

-Xinyue Yang

Posted on Mar.2nd, 2020