Tag Archives: Bacteria

Kill The Winner

What We Don’t See At Sea

When we are taught about the ocean’s food chain in elementary school, it seems simple enough. The tiny plankton at the bottom are the primary producers, equivalent to the plants on land, and everything gets bigger and more interesting from there.

The layman's ocean food chain

Figure 1. The Layman's Ocean Food Chain

In fact, plankton themselves hold an enormous amount of diversity. The term “plankton” include not just plants, but every kingdom of life. Huge diversity exists within each kingdom as well, multiple species fill each ecological niche in each environment (1).

Now, that level of diversity may seem odd. For one ecological niche in one environment, shouldn’t one species come to dominate? One would think that one species would prove best able to grow in the environment, take up the most nutrients and crowd out its competitors. Yet this diversity still exists.

For oceanic bacteria at least, the reason seems to be that they are trapped in a bitter conflict, a race between their own rate of replication and how quickly their tormentors destroy them. It is a war between bacteria and viruses, one which kills as many as 50% of the ocean’s bacteria every day (2).

Killing The Winner

The Blue Shell (Nintendo Corp.)

How does this explain the level of bacterial diversity? Bacteria must find a balance between their own success and avoiding eradication by viruses. Traditionally, an organism is considered  most successful when it grows to reach the highest population that its environment can support.

Viruses usually prey on only one species. A bacterium that has achieved complete success has made itself completely vulnerable to its viruses. In a dense population of its target species, a virus will spread like wildfire, and is much more likely to completely eliminate its prey (1). This concept is called “kill the winner.”

With population density limited in this way, there is room for other species to move into the same niche in the same environment, although it may not be as well suited as its competitor. So long as no one species reaches a density that allows a runaway viral infection, it will survive.

The ecological niche still supports a maximum number of organisms, but viruses kill the winner, ensuring a diversity of species in the same niche.

To help to illustrate the relationship between rates of infection and population density, adjust the population of this zombie apocalypse model using the + and – keys. Note that when the population is dense, the infection spreads much more quickly. If the humans start off winning, they lose very quickly.

Unlike the survivors in this simulation, bacteria can replace themselves, allowing a sustained population. Between rates of replication and death by infection, each bacterial species must find a way to succeed as best as it is able.

References

(1) Fuhrman, J. A.; Schwalbach, M.: Viral Influence on Aquatic Bacterial Communities Biol. Bull. 2003204, 192.

(2) The Annenberg Foundation: The Habitable Planet. http://www.learner.org/courses/envsci/index.html (accessed 03/12, 2012).

Human’s natural defence!

It have been unknown to many why our eyes, the most fragile system of our body are so resistant to bacterial infection. Tears are shed daily in our everyday life but beside lubricating our eyes, it has a eve more important function.

Bacteriologist Alexander Fleming discovered in human tears a germ-fighting enzyme which he named lysozome in 1922. He collected his own tears, then demonstrated its extraordinary power to exterminate bacteria infront of contemporaries at Britain’s Royal Society.

tears contain an enzyme that gobbles up bateria

How is this possible? According to Philip Collins, a physics professor at University of California, Irvine, each molecule is essentially a set of rapacious jaws that latches onto microbial invaders, starts chomping and does not let go.

This motion allows enzyme to open huge holes in the bacteria, which cause the bacteria to explode.

Each tear you shed contains an armada of these enzymes, ready to gobble up germs before they infect the sensitive tissue around your eye. However to study these enzymes, the researchers must keep one of the molecules still. To do this they  relied on a tiny technology: carbon nanotubes.

A lysozyme molecule was tethered by an amino acid to a nanotube. Then passed an electric current along the tube, turning the molecules into little transistor. When lysozyme sprang into action each bite of its jaws produce an electrical activity.

This signal was like “a microphone that allows us to listen in on the enzyme’s activity,” according to Collins.

This newly found technique was also used to study many other molecules. For further understanding on the processes used :

YouTube Preview Image

Resources: