Tag Archives: MHC

Cutting out the middleman

Fungal infection of the bone marrow. Image by euthman.

Nowadays, clinical transplantation is known to save many lives, but not without a catch. Patients have to go through immunosuppressive therapy if the MHC molecules on the graft, or transplanted tissue, do not match their own.

Our bodies are very picky and sensitive. For instance, we are okay with accepting skin grafts from ourselves – this is a type of autograft. However, if we were to be given a skin graft from someone unrelated, this arrangement is not long-lived. We let this allograft stick around for a bit, but ultimately kick it out after 10-13 days. We’ll remember it, too. Like a woman scorned, if this same offensive graft comes again, we boot it out even faster. The T cells living in our bodies as defenders do not take kindly to foreign tissue. Immune responses are mounted as a result, causing transplant rejection. Learn more about the immune response here:

YouTube Preview Image
For clinical transplantation to be successful, people have relied on immunosuppressive drugs to inhibit the defensive mechanisms our cells carry out when we encounter foreign molecules. This is problematic because now people are more susceptible to cancer and infections. The issue with transplant rejection is that donor and recipient cells don’t like each other. What do we do when two people don’t get along? We force them to.

Scientists have recently tested a method for transplant recipients to accept mismatched donor organs. In this ongoing trial, patients are exposed to chemotherapy and radiation and injected with enriched donor stem cells, hoping to achieve what is called “chimeric tolerance”. The idea is to make two immune systems work in one body by destroying the host’s first.

This new approach is pretty questionable. Small sample size aside, it is not known whether the enriched cells really made an impact as the study is missing a control group (where patients would presumably undergo treatment without these cells). Furthermore, these cells were not described very clearly. Suppressing the immune system with chemotherapy and radiation is also unnecessarily harmful and risky. Will it be worth it in the end?

The lengths we will go to in order to cure disease (Image from xkcd.com - click to enlarge).

References:

1. Murphy, Kenneth P. Janeway’s Immunology (8th ed), p652-664.
2. Steenhuysen, Julie. Immune system tricked to accept donor organs: study. NewsDaily. Accessed March 14, 2012.
3. Garland Science. The Immune Response. Youtube video, accessed March 14, 2012.

A Lovely Indecision

There’s hardly anything as conflicting as tastes, especially subconscious tastes that vary on a monthly cycle and alternate with circumstance. In honour of Valentine’s Day, we shall explore the theme of indecision in female mate selection, featuring the wonders of the pill.

To begin, attraction in females shifts between when she’s ovulating and not.

While in the fertile throws of follicle phase, females generally prefer a male with manly features and high testosterone levels, as well as a dissimilar Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC). MHCs are linked to immunity, so humans naturally seek to diversify for maximum heterozygosity and variation. A fun fact, while fertile, girls in relationships are also known to develop a taste for dominant smelling men.

YouTube Preview Image (A little More on MHC)

Most of the time though, women are not in fertile mode, and in these circumstances tend to fall back on men who have a similar MHC to themselves. They also favour men who are less masculine and more nurturing and supportive, especially if they live in a healthy environment.

Based on these natural cycles, we can see how there might be some conflict of interest depending on what day it is.

"I don't know what I want!" Image:ehow.com

Sometimes, one doesn’t even need cycles to complicate things. While single, girls have an increased preference for MHC similar men, but then have dissimilar MHC preference when they’re already with someone. If that’s not enough, these changing preferences of MHC make a huge impact as scent is much more emphasized in importance with women rather than men. Occasionally, scent can even be at odds in importance with visuals though it varies on the population and culture.

That said, a person’s heterozygosity of their MHC can be sensed through the inspection of facial features. While females favour as much heterozygosity as possible, they seem to be attracted to those with similar MHC as well.

So, visuals conflict with olfactory cues? Awesome.

Now what about the pill? Surely this fabulous contraption of contraception must simplify things no? Well, sort of.

The Pill adds some consistency, whereby everyday is non-fertile day. It’s more or less a fake pregnancy that replaces the possibility of a real one, and this causes women to go into “find a nurturing, similar man phase.” It’s without any surprise then that women on the pill have a marked preference for MHC similar men that totally overrides any ambition for seeking a dissimilar partner.

Consistency? Fabulous! What’s the catch?

Women who find their man on the pill tend to have less sexual attraction to their partners as well as decreasing sexual satisfaction over time. They become very jealous at a rate proportional to estradiol intake, and also have an increased desire to cheat, meanwhile having much more severe “affective responses” to partner infidelity, and having an increased frequency of “mate retention behaviour.” And you put on a few :3

But don’t worry, there are some positives. Those that meet their partner on the pill have more satisfaction with their partner in non-sexual ways, have happier relationships with more emotional satisfaction, and have relationships that last 2 years longer on average.

So really no matter what, it’s a mess of matter of preference. Just have a preference for the mess that you prefer.

"Use Both Instead!" Image:ehow.com