Category Archives: Science in the News

Self-driving cars, dangerous or safe?

Self-driving cars have been a leading force in car making for a while now. A concerning question that arises with the development of the automatic cars is how safe is it to be safe enough?

WHAT IS THE IMPACT OF COLONOSCOPY TESTING ON COLON CANCER RATES?

The safety features of current self-dring cars developed by Waymo. http://www.justscience.in/articles/impact-colonoscopy-testing-colon-cancer-rates/2017/12/15

For human drivers, we have drivers test to validate the ability to drive on the streets. However, for these self-driving cars, what are the standards? Do the cars have to obtain their driver licence as well before they can go on the road?

In a 2016 study, Kalra and a colleague showed that self-driving cars would have to trek hundreds of millions or perhaps billions of miles to demonstrate with comfortable certainty that they caused fewer fatalities than the average person (about 1.1 per 100 million miles driven). Based on the current number of self-driving cars, that task could take decades or centuries to complete.

Tech developers hardly have that kind of time, so companies like Waymo assess their vehicles’ safety by pairing real driving time with practice on a private track and millions of miles a day in computer simulations.

However, there are still some concerning questions as simulations cannot account for some absurd situations that might occur. The University of Michigan came up with general guidelines for safe self-driving cars. Can self-driving vehicles compensate for contributions to crash causation by other traffic participants, as well as vehicular, roadway and environmental factors?  Can all relevant inputs for computational decisions be supplied to a self-driving vehicle?  Can computational speed, constant vigilance, and lack of distractibility of self-driving vehicles make predictive knowledge of an experienced driver irrelevant?

The hesitance to provide a safe enough vehicle has been one of the major hindering factors when it comes to the development of self-driving vehicles as no company is willing to take the risk in selling potentially dangerous cars.

Therefore, some test similar to the standardized crash test for regular cars should be applied to self-driving vehicles to assess the chances of accidents due to machine error and human driving errors.

Here is a video uploaded by Ted-ed explaining some other dilemmas when it comes to self-driving cars.

Do you know someone with Alzheimer’s? 

Chances are you answered yes because Alzheimer’s is currently the sixth largest cause of death in the United States, and it continues to rise. Between 2000-2017, Alzheimer’s has increased by 145% and now affects about 5.8 million people in USA. Alzheimer’s is a degenerative brain disease that has no cure. It often starts with loss of memory and can lead to loss of communication and even death. Such individuals can require specialized care in later stages, which can put pressure on medical systems and family. Most people see symptoms after their 65thbirthday. It is generally accepted that amyloid plaques (protein fragments that get stuck in the brain) are somehow linked to Alzheimer’s, but the exact relationship is not known. A recent study from MIT suggests brain waves could be used to get rid of such plaques and help improve memory.

Gamma Way Treatments May Be Key to Fighting Alzheimer’s

Researchers at MIT, led by senior author Li-Huei Tsai, exposed a group of mice to gamma brain waves and stimulating sounds. The brain is made up of many types of neurons, which are specialized cells, that must communicate with each other. They do this through electrical signals, and if these signals cycle about 25-80 times per second they are labelled as gamma waves. Gamma waves are thought to play an important role in memory and cognition and previous research has shown they may play a role in reducing brain amyloids.

Courtesy: Pexels | Photo Credit: Pixabay | A researcher peers into a microscope.

The MIT researchers had previously performed similar experiments with only audio or only gamma ray stimulation. Both of these experiments had shown positive results for mice memory. The mice were better able to navigate mazes and identify objects. The decided to build on those previous projects by subjecting the mice to both types of treatments. The results were resoundingly positive and resulted in a “… very dramatic reduction of amyloid,” explained Dr. Tsai. Mice were once again better able to remember and navigate mazes and recognize objects. However, even though initial results are promising, more research needs to be done to determine whether this treatment is safe and effective for humans. Also, the mice stopped showing improvement if the treatments were stopped for a week, meaning treatment may have to be recurring to provide any benefit.

Caring for Those with Alzheimer’s Is Not Easy

Courtesy: Pexels | Photo Credit: Matthias Zomer | People with Alzheimer’s need specialized care and support.

Caring for people with Alzheimer’s is no small task. Not only does it require immense resources and specialized care, but it can also weigh on family members and caregivers. In 2018 alone, $277 billion US dollars were spent on Alzheimer’s care, and this number is expected to grow as the population ages. Currently, a number for prescription drugs exist to slow down the disease in its early stages but there is no definite treatment. This research could lead the way for one of the first treatments that could actually reverse the effects of this disease. About 95% of Alzheimer’s affects those above 65, which means younger generations may still be able to reap the rewards of continued research in this field.

-Sukhman Bhuller

Do humans have superpowers? -Magnetoreception

What if you had a superpower? What would you want it to be? The ability to fly? Superhuman strength? Well, what if the ability was to tell which direction the sun would rise from without actually seeing the rise, or just finding your way back to camp when you get lost in the woods? Researchers from Caltech and the University of Tokyo have found evidence that humans can subconsciously detect changes in the Earth’s magnetic fields.

Although this study only suggests that the effects of changes in magnetic fields are detectable by our subconscious brain, they feel that this could open up the window for new research. Prof. Shinsuke Shimo, in a YouTube video with science communicator Derek Muller says, “This is just the first step to make sure that it’s not theoretically impossible that our ancestors might have utilized this ability for their navigation.”

 

Derek Muller from Veritasium takes the test of magnetoreception

The ability of an organism to detect magnetic fields to identify directions, altitude or location is known as Magnetoreception. Have you ever wondered how pigeons are always able to find their way home? Or how birds know which direction is south when they migrate? Evidence of magnetoreception has even been found in dogs that will usually sit in North-South direction while they poop.

Prof. Shimo also believes that this ability may potentially reside in modern humans. Not so long ago, Prof. Joseph Kirschvink of Caltech claimed that he had discovered magnetoreception in humans. A few years later, Kirschvink, along with Shimo and co have found evidence suggesting humans may potentially posses a superpower.

It is important to remember that as of this moment, humans are only capable to detecting changes in magnetic fields subconsciously in a state with no distractions from the surroundings. However, if we were able to study and bring this ability to the consciousness, we would not only be gaining a superpower but also making inroads into bringing other parts of subconsciousness into consciousness.

If you wish to learn more about magnetoreception, you can watch this short video by Science Magazine.

 

 

 

Immortality?

What defines immortality? If immortality is defined by “living” beyond the grave as a physical body with a personality and ability to interact with the world, then computer science is on the edge of this scary yet fascinating phenomenon.

https://www.sciencealert.com/images/articles/processed/shutterstock_225928441_web_1024.jpg

What is it:

In the past few years, researchers have developed many different types of AI technology to capture and store human data, with the potential of building Virtual Reality replicas of the deceased. This AI technology is based on the idea of “augmented reality,” where an AI programme uses the technological imprint – past social media – left behind by someone to build a digital replica of them. Lifenaut, a branch of the Terasem Movement, for example, gathers human personality data for free with the hope of creating a foundational database to one day transfer into a robot or holograph. While this technology is still in its experimental stages, at least 56,00 people have already stored mind-files online, each containing the person’s unique characteristics, including their mannerisms, beliefs, and memories. According to researchers, in about fifty years, millennials will have reached a point in their lives where they will have generated zettabytes (1 trillion gigabytes) of data, which is enough to create a digital version of themselves.

How:

The prospective application of this technology is that loved ones may use robot reincarnation as a way to grieve or commemorate someone who passed away. VR replicas will be able to speak with the same voice as the dead person, ask questions, and even perform simple tasks. They may be programmed to contain memories and personality, so family members could dynamically converse and interact with them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=89&v=KYshJRYCArEConcerns:

Concerns:

Of course, digital-afterlife technology is a revolutionary concept that brings major ethical and practical implications. Some believe that VR replicas of loved ones are a normal, new way to mourn the deceased, similar to current ways people use technology to remember their loved ones, such as watching videos or listening to voice recordings. The problematic part of this application is that it does not seem like a healthy way to grieve. Allowing people to clutch onto digital personas of deceased individuals out of fear and delusion could effectively inhibit people from moving on with their life. The other consequence that this AI technology threatens is the potential of robots achieving high intelligence, becoming so advanced they could replicate the human race. Some futurists thus believe that it is essential to program chips with preventative technology into robots to battle this apocalyptic risk. There are also significant social implications to consider with VR replicas. Should the right to create these replicas be based solely on wealth? The prospect of people having the ability to buy immortality, even in digital form, is certainly problematic, as it perpetuates troubling societal disparity. Ultimately, there are far too many harmful individual and societal consequences of VR human replication technology for it be a worthwhile or necessary AI innovation.

Do you believe in immortality?

No, and one life is enough for me.” – Albert Einstein

~ Angela Wei

Maybe my mom was right…

Ragged, calloused fingers danced across the damp ivory keys of the slightly out-of-tune instrument. A nocturne echoed, howling across the room, as the fear of failure kept his teary eyes glued upon the page. A metaphorical chain shackling him to the traditional device of torture twisted deep into the flesh of his aching wrists. A slave to the music. Broken, tired, and hungry. Those dark and terrible years would haunt him for the rest of his life.

As soon as I could walk, I was forced to play the piano. The daunting task of rehearsing the same piece for hours enraged my heart as a child, and when I asked my mom “why?” she always replied with “you’ll appreciate it when you’re older.” After 14 years of slaving away on that wretched instrument, along with having symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome, I realized, maybe she was right. I was privileged to have an opportunity that she hadn’t had when she grew up and it allowed me to appreciate music further as well as learn other instruments with ease. But beyond this, I questioned, “in what other ways did I benefit from playing an instrument?” As a kid, I remember overhearing how playing piano had some correlation between being better at math, and although this seemed crazy, it led me to ponder the effects that playing instruments had on the brain.

 

Piano Keys By Elliot Billings 

How does playing an instrument affect the brain?

Today, the study of the brain is conducted by monitoring participants as they complete tasks such as reading or mathematical equations. Neuroscientists have found, that in doing such specific areas of the brain were activated. When monitoring the activation as participants listened to music, they found multiple areas across the brain firing all at once which differed from other activities.  Moreover, when playing a musical instrument nearly the entire brain was stimulated.

How does this transfer over to things outside of music?

Just as working out makes a person stronger, practicing an instrument is found to strengthen the brain functions used. For example, since studies show that there are common mechanisms used when playing an instrument and reading, it can be said that music can be used to promote child literacy. Similar suggestions from other studies can also be said for playing an instrument with linguistics and mathematics. These benefits, even when done as a child, were retained all the way into adulthood.  Furthermore, the act of playing an instrument utilizes both sides of the brain. In doing so, musicians are found to have increased volume and activity in the brain’s corpus callosum, which is what links the two sides together. This means that the brain has an easier time sending messages from one side to another, which could be beneficial as each side focuses on different processes. The TED-ED video below goes into further detail on the topic. 

The Corpus Callosum by Henry Vandyke Carter

So, in the unfortunate case that I end up with a child, I’ll probably get them to learn an instrument at a young age, and if they ask why, I’ll tell them “You’ll appreciate it when you’re older.”

-Nelson Bulaun

 

 

 

Can Video Games Help You Learn?

Canada currently has the third largest video game industry in the world. As a leader in the industry, it comes to no surprise that over 19 million Canadians identify as gamers. In doing so, as the societal interest in video games increases, so does the interest to research the effects of gaming, especially on students.

Child playing Fortnite. Image from Alex Haney, Unsplash

What does past research show?

Past research has shown that gaming by young people can lead them to develop a variety of detrimental behaviours. Children who played violent games had a higher likelihood of being more antisocial, more aggressive, and less empathetic than their non-gaming peers. Other studies have shown that excessive gaming can have a similar effect on a child’s brain as drugs and alcohol. This effect would lead to poor school performance and a higher likelihood of developing other addictions later in life. These results highlight the issues behind unhealthy gaming behaviour that goes beyond the limits of a hobby. While these results are very important to consider, there may be some benefits to gaming.

Is there any current research on gaming?

A recent study done by Ruhr-Universität Bochum compared the learning of gamers and non-gamers. Of the 34 participants, 17 volunteers did not play games regularly, and the other 17 played for 15+ hours a week. Both groups completed a weather prediction task while being recorded by an MRI.

In the task, participants were shown a combination of cue cards with varying symbols. Based on the cards shown, they had to guess whether that particular combination predicted sun or rain. With each guess, participants were given feedback on whether they were correct or not. This feedback would lead to learning of the combinations by all participants, but at varying rates.

Diagram of the brain showing the hippocampus, amygdala and cerebellum. Image from picturesboss.com

What are the effects of gaming on learning?

The results showed that gamers were significantly better at learning the card combinations with a faster learning curve and more correct answers. While the non-gamers did show learning, they were much slower in comparison. Also, the MRI scans showed that gamers had a stronger activation response in the hippocampus and surrounding regions of the brain. All of which are associated with learning and memory.

Based on these results, researchers were able to conclude that gaming helped individuals in probability-based tasks, which are activities that requires individuals to learn rules as they go. Gamers displayed a heightened ability to analyze and adapt to a new situation. This adaptation showed that players had a much better categorization performance, where they are able to generate and classify new information quickly. Thus illustrating that video games helped enhance learning performance rather than deter it.

While excessive gaming can have detrimental effects, there also are some beneficial factors. Video games, when done in moderation, allows individuals to learn more rapidly by training their hippocampus to be quick and effective. Video games create a challenging environment that pushes players to problem-solve and think creatively to achieve their goals. Looking ahead, researchers believe that further studies can be done to see whether games can help older people reduce the effects of memory loss.

– Arrthy Thayaparan

How Does Sugar Affect Your Brain?

When people are stressed, they often find themselves craving sugar, sweets or chocolate. Despite the fact that they can temporarily give some pleasure, they’re highly addictive and the overconsumption of sugar has many brain-related health consequences.

Sweets. Image from Pexels

Sugar Is Addictive

When sugar is consumed, it activates the tongue’s taste receptors. Then, signals are sent to the prefrontal cortex of the brain which stimulates the reward pathways and causes the release of dopamine, a natural chemical that makes us feel good.

The nucleus accumbeans is a part of the brain that receives dopamine and gives you a sense of pleasure.  Activating the brain’s reward system is associated with it and activating it with an appropriate amount of sugar is harmless. However, when it’s activated too frequently, the signal from sugar consumption becomes weaker and it grows the tolerance to sugar. Then, people need to consume more in order to feel the same pleasure, causing addiction.

The rewarding system that sugar gives is very similar to what keeps alcoholics and drug addicts to stay addicted. According to a study, there is a high degree of overlap between brain regions involved in processing natural rewards, such as sugar, and drugs. This is why it’s hard for people to control the consumption of sugar after constant exposure, and creates a dangerous cycle of excessive cravings.

Prefrontal cortex and Nucleus accumbens. Image from Public Domain Files

Brain-Related Health Problems

Besides addiction, sugar has many other negative effects on the brain. For example, sugar affects the overeating sensor, lowering our ability to feel a sense of fullness. When sugar is consumed constantly, the brain’s anorexigenic oxytocin system that senses and prevents overeating becomes less sensitive and does not release hormones that signal the body that we are full. Thus, people are likely to continue eating even after they’ve had enough which then could contribute to obesity and diabetes. 

Furthermore, sugar affects memory and learning skills by lowering the amount of the Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) factor. BDNF is what helps the brain with learning and forming new memories. Therefore, when BDNF is low, the ability to learn new things and our memory reduce. According to a study, researchers found out that a diet in high amount of sugar hinders learning and memory by literally slowing down the brain. The rats who over-consumed fructose (a form of sugar) ended up with impaired communication among brain cells.

Not All Sugars Is Bad

Although sugar has many negative effects on the brain, it is true that not all sugars is bad. Glucose, a form of sugar from carbohydrates like bread, fuels the cells throughout the body and is the primary source of energy for the brain. Thus, in order to manage your sugar intake, it’s important to avoid the consumption of fructose from processed foods and know that you only need a small amount of sugar per day as the World Health Organization recommends only 5% of daily caloric intake from sugar.

-Janet Lee

The battleground of human genetic engineering

Science, ethics, ideology, and politics all clash fiercely over an innocent-sounding topic: the “designer baby”. This battle has loomed unusually large in the public view after a recent announcement that a Chinese scientist intentionally used a controversial genetic engineering technique on a set of viable human embryos, a global first. There are a number of fascinating perspectives to explore, and this story comes with a sprinkling of geopolitical intrigue as well.

In November of 2018, scientist He Jiankui announced that he had used a burgeoning gene editing tool, CRISPR-Cas9 (or just CRISPR, for short), to genetically modify two twin girls. He claims to have used this tool in an attempt to confer genetic resistance to HIV/AIDS by disabling one particular gene, CCR5. CRISPR, while extremely promising, is still quite poorly tested, and has been proven capable of deleting much larger swaths of genetic material than intended. The main concern is that these deletions could eliminate sections of a cell’s genetic code that are crucial for its normal functions, which could lead to problems such as cancer. There is also a concern that catastrophic errors could be transferred genetically to descendants.

Molecular biologist Ellen Jorgensen explains CRISPR-Cas9’s mechanics and potential.
Source: TED

 

Unsurprisingly, then, He’s announcement was met with widespread backlash from the scientific community. An official investigation showed that He fabricated ethics approvals in order to recruit participants for his experiment, and he was subsequently fired from his university. Because of its dangers, many countries (including China) have prohibited gene editing of human embryos for reproductive purposes.

However, He’s situation may not have been quite what it seems. He has been painted as a rogue agent, pursuing his research in relative secrecy in pursuit of fame or notoriety. His university, the hospital where the edited twins were born, and even his own government denounced his actions. Suspiciously, though, the Washington Post noted that, in an interview with the Associated Press, an executive from that same hospital applauded He’s research on camera, and the university was listed as a sponsor on a copy of the informed consent form He used for his experiment. Furthermore, CCR5, the gene He attempted to modify, is associated with memory and cognition, meaning that the modified twins may exhibit augmented intelligence.

He Jiankui speaking at the Second International Summit on Human Genome Editing. Source: Iris Tong (Voice of America)

Is it possible that the Chinese government is covertly supporting or encouraging unethical genetic engineering practices? Dr. Gregory Licholai of Yale’s School of Management notes that China has been much quicker than other countries to expedite human trials of CRISPR-enabled cancer treatments, and that China’s regulatory authorities have been “extremely permissive” regarding CRISPR clinical trials.

The genetic modification of humans carries enormous risks and rewards. With enough skill and some good luck, a country that supports early adoption of human gene editing could claim significant health and intellectual advantages over the rest of the world within a generation. Only time will tell if November’s announcement quietly ushered in a new age of geopolitical competition.

— Ricky C.