Categories
ETEC565 Module 4 Uncategorized

Im-prezi-ve

The toughest part of putting together any multi-media project is getting the media – particularly when 90% of it is analogue.  In this day and age, it is certainly easier but as my stories and ideas often come from – yes, it is true – pre-digital times, tracking down these items and digitizing them can be quite a task.  Thinking forward, I should probably capture more with my 3 digital cameras & cell phone – a hard habit to get into since I was brought up on an aperture priority SLR – to say nothing of digitizing my old photos).  Still, coming up with a true(-ish) story to tell that would be worthwhile pedagogically, a good fit with the course I’m developing and interesting to my students (and my classmates),  was no easy task either.  In fact, I actually found the ‘search’ for the ‘right’ tool and the ‘ease of use’ relatively easy in comparison.  This is not to say that I did not get mired in both possibilities and perfectionism, but I worked quite hard to plan properly and to stick to the plan so I only went about 5 hours ‘over budget’.

I chose to relate a story called a critical incident (true story, just the images have been  changed to protect the innocent) that happened to me some 20+ years ago.  It is a story that I have told orally, but have never written down.  I do use critical incidents when I teach, but they are always delivered in text form – whether in person or online.  Although I had no idea how it might look as a presentation/media ‘event’ of any sort, I tried to imagine what the possibilities were and what I could (a little unusual for me, admittedly).  While I go into more detail on my Story page, I will say here that I’m very pleased with choice of Prezi as an authoring tool.  My story flowed nicely from my memory, to text to Prezi, with very few bumps along the way.  The movement that Prezi allows from point to point (and back again, if you – the presenter or the audience –  wish or need to) adds visual movement the presentation of story elements making it seem as if it were animated.  It is simple, yet really creates a dynamic presentation, not only on its own, but with an added oral component as well (I tried telling the story as I watched it and it was great).  Heck,  I was so pleased with it, I even asked a friend to look at it to make sure it made sense (and thankfully, it did).  I think my students will really benefit from using this tool (again, more about this on my Story page) and hope to use it in my regular classes.  All of my student do presentations at the end of their program and I would love to see them try using this tool to enhance them.  I’m envisioning introducing the tool at an earlier stage and getting them to do some of their projects on them.

Bottom line: I had fun.  I enjoyed this activity on many levels (especially the stress to success ratio) that it even made storytelling (something I do not do creatively well at and hence am not fond of) enjoyable.

Categories
Uncategorized

Asynchronous vs Synchronous Communication

I quite enjoy participating in asynchronous discussion forums – both formal and informal – and use them in all of my online teaching ventures.  I think its a great tool to use with international students because I believe it ‘levels the playing field’ with regards to classroom communication practices and styles for many, if not all of the candidates I work with.  It not only gives the students the time it also gives them the opportunity to really think through their responses to the discussion questions they are presented with on their own but also gives them the opportunity to ability to present their thoughts without interruption.   In addition, it also, to a certain extent, levels the keyboarding and communicative competence in English skills (or lack thereof) playing field.
Though I have only participated in synchronous group communication as a student in the MET program (in 5 of my courses – some required, some voluntary – for group assignments, ranging in size from 4 participants to 20, all using text) it is a communication form that I am not a fan of.  While this likely stems, at least in part, from my personal challenges with being able to actively participating in synchronous chats, I’m not entirely certain they would be of great value to the students I work with.  In a sense, they seem to be trying to mimic a f2f (which makes me think of fake bacon for some reason, a food which does not make a lot of sense to me).  I do hold one-to-one synchronous meetings with each student before they arrive in Vancouver, but tend to stay away from synchronous group activities when I am teaching here as most of the students can schedule (and seem to prefer) a f2f meeting or a phone call (over contacting me via email).  I do see the value of trying to incorporate some sort of synchronous activity in this particular course, though, as we will be working on interview skills for face to face interviews (or phone interviews) and the students will not be here.  I’ll have to double check to see how comfortable students would be with using a technology for this (like Wimba) and if they have the necessary hardware/bandwidth.  I will also have to take a close look at my own comfort level with these technologies.  I have started to write a student handbook for the use of the tools/technologies I will be using in this course but this is turning into quite a daunting task and I wonder if this balances with the value the use of all these tool brings to this learning experience as a whole.

Categories
ETEC565 Uncategorized

Taking my own advice

So, I thought to myself, how difficult could it be to make a DVD?  After advising Anju to do one, I thought it best to make sure I could do it myself.  I have made some DVDs of photographs and videos from trips I’ve taken to give to my family, so the technology and software (Window’s Movie Maker – WMM) wasn’t completely foreign to me.  My only concern at the offset was that the push to be creative with the editing tools would be a challenge, especially finding that balance between artistry and chaos.

Working with some video clips I had taken of students practicing their interview skills, digital stills, a microphone and a PowerPoint presentation… hold on… did I say PowerPoint (PPT) presentation?  Since I’m more comfortable with PPT (and, since I did suggest this to Anju), I thought I’d incorporate the video and images into the existing presentation and do a voice/sound overlay.  Then I thought, ‘why not export the slides to Movie Maker and see if I could do the editing there?’

The original presentation (with animated text and graphics) took about an hour to put together (though I’ve spent over 50 hours on other presentations with full media production value, which had me a bit worried about this excercise).  I tried not to get too caught up in the ‘artistry’, for lack of a better term, and just play with some of the editing tools (especially the timeline and narrate timeline tools) in WMM and found them to be much easier to use then similar ones in PowerPoint which was a nice discovery/surprise and made me think about how I could make a lot of ‘stand alone’ presentations from my PPTs.  When I published the this file/movie, I noticed that it was a bit on the large size so putting on a dvd might be a better choice then putting it on a website as downloading it might be a bit challenging for those with limited internet connectivity.  Total post conversion/post production time: 5 hours (a bit long, but the narration was a bit tedious.  Oh, and there was a fair bit of playing around with/testing the editing tools.)

Categories
Uncategorized

Hello world!

Greetings fellow ETEC565ers.  I look forward to getting to know all of you, working with you, learning with you and learning from you.

Spam prevention powered by Akismet