Categories
Uncategorized

Tim Horton’s Should Shorten Menu to Shorten Line

After reading fellow classmate Brian Chung’s blog post on disagreeing with Tim Horton CEO Marc Caira’s hopes to cut down menu items, I have actually decided that I in fact do support the CEO’s thinking. The new CEO of Canada’s own Tim Horton’s wants to cut down menu choices to increase speed and efficiency in stores. Although I agree that including more choices will attract more consumers, I do not think that it is worth doing because store efficiency will be very limited – the number of workers hired can only do so much at a time. Instead, I agree with the CEO that cutting down choices will increase store efficiency, a prime example being the Tim Horton’s at Sauder. I know that out of the entire menu, I am sure that the same people always order the same things over and over, thus Tim Horton’s should cut down menu items to the most popular choices. I cannot count the times in my head where I have decided to not go to Tim Horton’s just because of the length of the line-up and crunch in time. Imagine if the line was always short – how much more in sales would the restaurant attract? Sticking to Porter’s Cost Leadership Strategy, which has been proven time and time again as accurate, will allow the company to specialize in only a few products, but do that well.

Categories
Uncategorized

My Two Cents on Consumerism: Let’s Save the Holidays!

When I first read fellow classmate’s Mariska’s blog post on how Singles’ Day turns into Shopping Day, I came to a realization that in today’s society, it appears that every holiday or significant event has turned into a reason for stores to hold extravagant sales, and consumers to buy yet again. In her post, Mariska discusses how Singles’ Day in China has now turned into a shopping spree, quoting that on that day the “Chinese bought 1.6 million bras”. Online sites such as tmall.com and dangdang.com joined in on the fun, with companies such as Nike, Adidas, Procter and Gamble utilizing these sites.

My two cents is that consumerism has brainwashed everyone in that holiday sales are increasing and becoming far too extravagant for people to actually enjoy the holiday. For instance, take Black Friday or Boxing Day as examples – sales for both these events start so early nowadays (we’re talking 3am lineups for 5am sales) that we don’t even get to celebrate properly anymore. Instead of enjoying Christmas dinner, we rush eating dinner to ensure that we sleep early to grab that $400 off deal on the latest Ultrabook. But is that really necessary? It seems like Boxing Day is the time people stop being thankful, and start being consumers. I say let’s save the holidays!

Categories
Uncategorized

The Petal Diagram: A New Way to Look at Competitors

The Petal Diagram: A New Way to Look at Competitors

 

In Steve Blank’s latest blog post, he introduces to entrepreneurs a new competitive analysis method to look at competitors. In his blog post, Steve acknowledges that today, start-ups are trying to “resegment existing markets or create new markets”, as opposed to “existing companies plan[ning] to enter existing markets”, and thus, Steve introduces the Petal Method. Here is how you the Petal Method works:

 

1. Start by putting the company in the center of the circle.

2. Draw 5 petals around the circles to show the market segments where customers for this new market would come from.

3. Fill the market spaces with the companies that represent each adjacent market.

4. Annotate the companies with the amount of capital raised – this allows potential investors to see the different values and amounts for each.

5. Show the market sizes for each adjacent market to determine how big each market is.

Slide4

This diagram is beneficial for companies exercising the Lean Start-up methodology and helps identify potential customer segments on the Business Model Canvas, as learned in class. By completing this activity, companies can see exactly which customers they are targeting and develop the first hypothesis on who the target market is.

 

Post: http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2013/11/11/a-new-way-to-look-at-competitors/

 

Categories
Uncategorized

Me to We: A Social Enterprise

 

When I attended my very first We Day in October 2010, I was completely blown away about the extent to which poverty, especially amongst children in third world countries, still exists in our world today. After hearing all the speakers’ and musicians’ words of encouragement on how youth can be the change – I set out back to my high school to found the first Free the Children club at Burnaby North Secondary. Throughout the years, I came to be familiar about everything to do with Free the Children, including its social enterprise, Me to We.

A social enterprise is a company that hopes to make profit, but one which is rooted with a social cause. In Me to We’s case, they aim to make a positive social and environmental impact through the sale of sweatshop free clothing, Me to We Artisans accessories that provides fair wage to women in developing countries, life-changing Me to We trips overseas, Me to We Books, Me to We inspirational speakers, and the list goes on. After learning more in depth about what a social enterprise entails, it is certain that a social enterprise is something that I am passionate in and look forward to learning more about.

 

Site: http://www.metowe.com/about-us/our-organization/social-enterprise-an-innovative-new-model/

 

 

Categories
Uncategorized

Pay Cash, Pay Less?

Of the many restaurants in the Crystal Mall area that I often go to with my family, I have noticed a recurring trend – there is always a folded up sheet of eight and a half by eleven white paper with “CASH ONLY” scribbled with marker in large font. You notice this is small boutiques as well. When I was young, I always wondered why this was the case. Now, of course, I know why that is – companies have to pay credit card companies a fee for the service of the credit card, or customer transaction services. Which is why I found it interesting to read that shopkeepers nowadays are willing to give discounts to customers who pay in cash, and want to lower fees so they don’t have to increase prices. However, credit card companies do not agree to changes that would make it more difficult to use their cards. Both sides state that they are “putting consumers first”. I agree that stores should give customers discounts when paying in cash because by doing so, both sides avoid credit card fees, and small businesses are benefited as a discount may pull customers away from bigger competitors. People saving money equals to people being happy. And in the end, who doesn’t love a discount?

 

Article:

http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/10/08/credit-card-fees-too-high-give-us-a-discount-for-paying-cash/

 

 

Categories
Uncategorized

Snapchat’s $3 Billion Answer: No.

Almost ashamed to say it, Snapchat has become part of my everyday life. As much as I am aware that it wastes my time, I use it just as much as I use Facebook, and so it caught my eye when I saw an article of the two in the news. An article that actually took me by surprise. Snapchat has once again rejected Facebook’s cash offer for the company. Mark Zuckerberg previously offered $1 billion to buy Snapchat but was rejected. This time around, for $3 billion, the offer was turned down once again. Snapchat is an app where a user sends a photo to a friend, with drawing or writing, with the friend only allowed to view it for a maximum of 10 seconds after opening. From there on, a conversation begins and essentially, friends “chat” over “snaps” – hence the name. Snapchat has been welcomed by young adults today – one of the top apps in the App Store. With 5 million users daily, it has proven to be the biggest no-revenue mobile app since Instagram. Instagram was bought by Facebook for $1 billion. So when Snapchat CEO Evan Spiegal turned down the $3 billion offer, eyebrows were raised. This offer was a huge deal – three times what Facebook paid for Instagram. The reason Facebook wants these applications because they want to own photos on mobile. I think it was a smart decision of Snapchat as they will eventually want an IPO to further expand their company. It will be interesting to see how the company performs independently in the coming years, as it is evident that they are staying clear of what Instagram did. My question is: will Snapchat last?

 

Article:

http://www.businessinsider.com/snapchat-rejected-a-3-billion-all-cash-offer-from-facebook-2013-11

 

Spam prevention powered by Akismet