There has been a debate over the issue of whether or not the Keystone XL pipeline should be build on a field in Nebraska. This field has an underground formation known as the Ogallala Aquifer, an underground body of freshwater the size of half of British Columbia . Detractors of the project claim that the pipeline presents a risk to the aquifer, which is essential to Nebraska farmers in such a dry land. Advocates of the construction instead believe it will create many jobs for Americans.

Deciding whether or not to build the pipeline is difficult, as the issue alternates between various pros and cons of the project. In my opinion this pipeline should not be built, as it is too much of a danger to the aquifer. This may damage the nearby agricultural industry, worsening the economy more than helping it. By learning from the BP oil incident, we all can foresee the potential impact of an oil spill in Nebraska. Additionally, with the pipeline built, it is likely that the oil industries in Alberta will have to increase output to meet America’s high demand. This development would have certain health impact on the Albertan residents.

Sources: Globe and Mail           Picture