Writing the first draft of the Technical Definition
For the technical definition assignment, we were asked to simplify a complex term for non-technical audiences. This was achieved through writing three different definitions: a parenthetical definition, a sentence definition, and an expanded definition. This task challenged my understanding of the term algorithm. The concept of algorithms is second-nature to me, but this assignment clarified blind spots in my understanding. For instance, I struggled with the construction of the sentence definition. In doing so, I realized I did not truly understand where algorithms fit in the larger scope of the field of computer science. In a similar fashion, the expanded definition broke down the bare bones of algorithmic processing (sequence, selection and iteration blocks). This supplemented the depth of my own understanding. The assignment also served as practice for writing to different audiences, and as a formal introduction to parenthetical, sentence and expanded definitions.
Peer Review Process
During the peer review process, I was tasked to read and review my team member’s (Christine Hsiao) draft of the definition of deductible. Through reading my team member’s work, I was able to see possible revisions needed in my own work. For example, Christine’s draft was more concisely constructed, and every sentence served its own point. This inspired me to cut down on some unnecessary elaboration in my own assignment. Reading another student’s work also clarified the possible ways one can approach this assignment. My approach was more heavily focused on the raw definition of the term algorithm, but my teammate emphasized her term in relation to PharmaCare patients. This illuminated my understanding of the realm of possibilities this assignment could take. Overall, the peer review process was a critical step for my final draft.
Final Revision