I keep changing my mind on whether I liked the second part of the book better or the first. At first, I did not like the book at all but I feel like I’m getting used to it now. Now that I’ve read more of the book I’m starting to like the first half of the book better than the later even though I didn’t initially like it. I liked the journal style entries that Garcia Madero provided because it felt easy to read. The interview style of writing is also kind of nice because it provides more people’s perspective rather than just Garcia Madero. It gives the feeling of being inside all these different character’s heads rather than just Garcia Madero’s subconscious thoughts. However, I think I liked Garcia Madero’s journal entries more. I also feel like including the city with the dates along with the names make it feel like an important interview being recorded and it feels very professional as if it can be used like a historical record. But despite the title and names I’m struggling to keep up with all the different narratives.
Consequently, I find it kind of hard to write about this book because I really just have no idea what to write. Unlike Shadows of the Wind where it’s hard to put the book down with the Savage Detective it feels like I’m not reading it as I should. I know that sounds odd but I feel like I’m probably missing some key details or I’m missing something important that I should have grasped. I feel like a detective trying to connect the dots with all the details given. And the thing about all the characters is that I feel like there are so many of them that I start to forget who is who and what story or details belong to which person. It certainly does not help that I have a terrible memory.
“But the truth is that I only slept with Ernesto a few times, so why should it be my fault if people got all worked up over nothing? I also slept with Maria Font, and Arturo Belano had a problem with that. And I would’ve slept with Luis Rosado that night and then Arthur Belano would’ve kicked me out of the group.” Page 152.
It’s kind of crazy how sex with multiple women is so normalized in this book. This quote shows an example from Luscious Skin’s interview where he says how he’s slept with multiple women. Even in my previous blog post I mentioned how Garcia Madero kept going from women to women. For example, the waitress and Maria. This seems to be a recurring theme in the book and it makes me question whether this was not frowned upon during that time period? Like I know in today’s day and time cheating has become so normalized even though it’s frowned upon so was this the case then too. Or is it just that Bolano has some weird obsession with the intimacy shown in his book.
Discussion Question: Do you think there’s a reason why we are hardly shown any poems even though that’s what the visceral realists are supposed to be about?