Grades

Assessment Rubrics SM6341

Assessment Task Criterion Excellent

(A+, A, A-)

Good

(B+, B, B-)

Adequate

(C+, C, C-)

Marginal

(D)

Failure

(F)

Production Plan Clear articulation of the steps for initiating production;

 

Time management is well outlined;

 

Production needs are well outlined;

 

Project Feasibility;

 

 

 

Excellent grasp of steps for documentary production, demonstrating firm knowledge of the field

 

Rich content, exceptional research and planning ability

Design and research is firmly built on excellent knowledge of subject matter

 

Excellent grasp of structure necessary to execute documentary

 

Firm grasp of steps for documentary production, demonstrating firm knowledge of the field

 

Adequate content, good research and planning ability

Design and research is firmly built on good knowledge of subject matter

 

Adequate grasp of structure necessary to execute documentary

 

 

Comprehensive grasp of steps for documentary production, demonstrating firm knowledge of the field

 

Adequate content, fair research and planning ability

Design and research is firmly built on fair knowledge of subject matter

 

Weak grasp of structure necessary to execute documentary

 

-Loose grasp of steps for documentary production, demonstrating firm knowledge of the field

Weak content, fair research and planning ability

 

Design and research is marginally built on subject matter

Poor grasp of structure necessary to execute documentary

 

Poor grasp of steps for documentary production

Inadequate content

 

Fail to make reasonable research and planning

Fail to grasp structure necessary to execute documentary

Shooting Report and Footage Presentation Footage is well shot with good sound and image quality

 

Key concepts and scenes are starting to emerge in initial footage

 

Student understands and can articulate the stage current footage is at, and step towards its completion

 

Content is compelling and rich

 

Student takes in comments from fellow classmates and tutor

 

 

 

 

Rich content, excellent ability to interpret and integrate various resources

Well defined and reasoned points of view grounded in insightful interpretation of existing work

Readiness to respond to peer opinion and other views initiated in class discussion

Adequate content, sufficient ability to integrate various resources based on demand

 

Clear elaboration of ideas that sticks to the point, with clearly differentiated issues, ability to interpret opinions independently

 

Sufficient responses to peer comments to sustain a discussion

Adequate content, fair ability to integrate various resources based on demand

Relevant points made to the subject matter in question

Ability to respond to other statements and engage in class discussion

Weak content, limited use of resources

Relevant points to the subject matter, marginal ability to interpret opinions

Ability to respond to other comments in simple terms

Inadequate content, no/ irrelevant use of resources

Irrelevant points to the subject matter, no ability to interpret opinions

Fail to respond to other comments

Final Screening discussions and Critique Creativity

 

Form and Content

 

Coherence / Research

 

Technical ability (sound, picture, music integration)

 

Personal Style

 

Ability to deal with critique and feedback

Excellent short documentary in form and content

 

Sound, Music and Picture quality is high

 

Student has integrated lessons learned into a compelling documentary output

 

Student takes in comments from fellow classmates and tutor

Well done short documentary in form and content

 

Sound, Music and Picture quality is well done

 

Student has integrated lessons learned into a well done documentary output

 

Readiness to respond to comments from fellow classmates and tutor

Adequate short documentary in form and content

 

Sound, Music and Picture quality is adequate

 

Student has integrated lessons learned into a decent documentary output

 

Ability to respond to comments from fellow classmates and tutor

Weak short documentary in form and content

 

Integration of Sound, Music and Picture quality is weak

 

Student has moderately integrated lessons learned into a documentary output

 

Weak ability to respond to comments from fellow classmates and tutor

Failure to complete a short documentary

 

Failure to integrate Sound, Music and Picture

 

Failure to integrate lessons learned into a documentary output

 

No ability to respond to comments from fellow classmates and tutor

Treatment and Paper Editing Creativity

 

Personal style

 

Clarity

 

Coherence

 

 

Work has strong affective quality and the articulation of personal styles and signature

Work raises questions and instill insights about the process of conception, creative strategization and production

Efficient adjustment of plans and strategies in response to resources

Work has articulation of personal styles and signature

Work shows important issues that requires exploration

Proper adjustment of plans and strategies in response to resources

Work is relatively complete and comprehensible

Limited ability to demonstrate creative thinking or exploration

Fair adjustment of plans and strategies in response to resources

Work is not affective at all

Marginal ability demonstrate the processes of thinking and creative exploration

Limited adjustment of plans and strategies in response to resources

No appreciation of the aesthetics and expressive qualities of the medium

Fail to create work that demonstrate the processes of thinking and creative exploration

No adjustment of plans and strategies in response to resources

Final Version -Screening and Discussion Coherent documentary work

 

Creative style

 

Clear point of view

 

Compelling subject matter

 

Understanding of the medium

 

Articulate discussion

–          Work has strong affective quality and the articulation of personal styles and signature

–          Work raises questions and instill insights about the process of conception, creative strategization and production

–          Excellent reception from viewers and peers

–          Strong exploration and/or application of the aesthetic and expressive qualities of the medium

–          Ability to create work that demonstrate the processes of thinking and creative exploration

–          Good reception from viewers and peers

–          Basic appreciation and/or application of the aesthetic and expressive qualities of the medium

–          Limited ability to create work that demonstrate the processes of thinking and creative exploration

–          Fair reception from viewers and peers

–          Marginal appreciation of the aesthetic and expressive qualities of the medium

–          Marginal ability to create work that demonstrate the processes of thinking and creative exploration

–          Poor reception from viewers and peers

–          No appreciation of the aesthetics and expressive qualities of the medium

–          Fail to create project/ work that demonstrate the processes of thinking and creative exploration

–          Very poor reception from viewers and peers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PLAGIARISM

In this course there is ZERO TOLERANCE for plagiarism and discovery of plagiarism could result in failure of the course. This includes sharing work with other students or collusion with other students to submit for grading the same projects.

For documentary projects, this means that when you have appropriated other source footage, you must give citations/links, and plagiarism in editing means that you have used edits which another editor has made. Said in another way, EVERY CUT IN YOUR SUBMITTED VIDEO WORK MUST BE YOUR OWN unless clearly justified in writing otherwise.

What is plagiarism?
According to the Cambridge Dictionaries Online, to plagiarize is “to use another person’s idea or a part of their work and pretend that it is your own”. In Cambridge advanced learners dictionary (2010). Cambridge Dictionaries Online (Links to an external site) So it is any act of using someone else’s ideas, words, concepts, images, sounds, edits, formulae or data without acknowledging the source, either intentionally or accidentally. It is therefore a dishonest practice of claiming credit for something you did not do.

How can you avoid plagiarism?
To avoid plagiarism, one should always provide information of the sources used, i.e., you must document or cite the sources of information which you have consulted or used in writing your paper, or editing your work. Therefore, it is important that you keep records of all sources that you have consulted so that you will be able to provide proper citations later.

A citation refers to the basic information about an information source (e.g., a book, an article, a media resource) sufficient for identifying the source. For example, a citation for a book usually includes the author, title, publisher, and date of publication.

Read more on Library » Research Guides » Citing Sources of Information

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *