Two of the main tasks I completed in unit three were the first draft of the formal report, and the peer review of my partner’s formal report. I have learned a great deal from these processes.
Formal Report
When I was brain storming for the scope of the formal report I thought I didn’t need to do much research or collect a lot of data because I came up enough discussion points to convince the management. Even when I completed my outline for the report, I still didn’t have a concrete plan in terms of data collection. Until Jasmine sent me an email, asking about my plans to collect data or interview questions, I realized that I should actually include some data to enforce my claim of the current situation of the company. It didn’t have to be really sophisticated data, simple historical revenue and number of active clients would be sufficient to demonstrate the profitability and the client base. Additional calculation of dividing the revenue by the number of employees would provide a rough estimate of the economics of scale of the company’s work force. With actual data, it would be a lot more convincing to the reader that I am making a proposal base on these facts. Another thing I learned that was a huge benefit for the writing process was to write an outline. Because during the writing process, I always forget the discussion points and sometime lose track of which part of the report I am writing. These causes the content jumping around and messes up the organization of the report. The outline keeps the content of the report contained and act as a great reminder especially it’s been written for a while. I can constantly refer back to it about what are the main points I intend to cover, what’s the order of the content. I finally realized the importance of an outline I started doing it at work, and it’s fantastic.
Peer Review Process
My partner wrote a report about something really interesting and sensitive, food safety in China. It has been a hot topic in recent years because there has been a lot of food scandals ranging from recycled cooking oil, selling rat meat as lamp meat, chemicals in dairy products and etc. It was interesting to read about her analysis and proposal to the government to resolve this issue. One thing she did extremely well was the organization of the report, especially the numbering system. She had an extensive use of sub numbers which enabled the content to have multiple layers. The depth of the report makes it look very professional. I am going to looking into the possibility of using a similar system on my report, I am not entirely sure how it will look because my content doesn’t have similar level of depths. I want to replace the bullet points with something else because they might have been a little bit too plain.