{"id":61,"date":"2011-10-21T15:16:08","date_gmt":"2011-10-21T22:16:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/eganfcp\/?p=61"},"modified":"2011-12-09T15:31:26","modified_gmt":"2011-12-09T22:31:26","slug":"confessions-of-an-educationalist-supremist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/eganfcp\/2011\/10\/21\/confessions-of-an-educationalist-supremist\/","title":{"rendered":"confessions of an educationalist supremist"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A few years ago I was at a dinner party, at which the host introduced me to a colleague. Said colleague was a great teacher (Killam I believe) and was finding their feet in educational research. I politely listened to their work, made a few toothless comments about how interesting it sounded. While I quietly seethed.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s true, I had&#8211;have, to a lesser extent&#8211;a chip on my shoulder about those not trained in educational research doing such research because of their subject matter expertise. I see this significantly differently now; reflecting about this has been rather useful to <em>my<\/em> practice as a researcher. Including a smidge of hypocrisy on my part&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Dedication, industriousness and planning are attributes of most excellent teachers&#8230;but not all teachers who are dedicated, industrious, and who plan well are excellent teachers. A minority probably are mediocre teachers&#8211;or worse. Of those that are good teachers&#8211;or great teachers&#8211;the ability to teach effectively doesn&#8217;t also make one a good educational researcher. In terms of staff development, too many subject matter experts are abandoned when they begin their teaching careers (&#8220;you&#8217;re an expert; you&#8217;re ready to teach&#8221;). So why would we encourage instructors to engage in SoTL work without an appropriate amount of training? Suffice to say Heather Kanuka&#8217;s (2011) article resonated with me.<\/p>\n<p>Which speaks to the value of the FCP.<\/p>\n<p>Ah but then&#8230;I have a PhD in education&#8211;but in adult education. My research areas of expertise are in health promotion, community education, and social justice education. You&#8217;ll notice there&#8217;s no mention of course design, pedagogical methods, evaluation or assessment. Because they were not part of my doctoral studies. They were, however, part of my practice as an educator&#8211;higher education most recently. My magistral studies included coursework on program planning (curriculum design) and learning theory though. And I&#8217;ve certainly planned, delivered, and evaluated all sorts of courses and programs.<\/p>\n<p>But trained in SoTL research? <strong>No<\/strong>. Trained in social research methods? Oh yes: ethnography, surveys (correlational design), mixed methods, discourse analysis. Thus in terms of research paradigms, I&#8217;m not finding the materials of the FCP challenging&#8211;they&#8217;re the world I&#8217;ve lived in as a researcher for years. It&#8217;s the transfer of knowledge to its new application that presents the challenges for me.<\/p>\n<p>On principle SoTL is important and of merit; it needs to be done well though: with rigour, using solid methods. Or, what Kreber (2007) calls &#8220;authentic practice&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p><strong>References<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Kanuka, H. (2011). Keeping the Scholarship in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. <em>International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5<\/em>(1).<\/p>\n<p>Kreber, C. (2007). What is it really all about? The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning as an Authentic Practice. <em>nternational Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1<\/em>(1).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A few years ago I was at a dinner party, at which the host introduced me to a colleague. Said colleague was a great teacher (Killam I believe) and was finding their feet in educational research. I politely listened to their work, made a few toothless comments about how interesting it sounded. While I quietly [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":256,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-61","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/eganfcp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/eganfcp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/eganfcp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/eganfcp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/256"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/eganfcp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/eganfcp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":108,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/eganfcp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61\/revisions\/108"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/eganfcp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/eganfcp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ubc.ca\/eganfcp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}