Peer Review
Reviewer: Brianna Diogo
Author: Samantha Teeple
Title of Expanded Definition: Xerostomia
First Impressions:
The definitions were concise and I was able to understand them on the first read-through. The definition was full of information and detail and I felt thoroughly informed. I would add some more specific titles, especially in the expanded definition portion, maybe using questions like “what is Xerostomia”? Etc. As well, I would add a few more sections detailing consequences if no treatment is sought, risks, etc.
Purpose:
- The purpose of the document is incredibly clear, and it is made evident that these are different types of definitions.
- I would have liked to see a few more sections detailing a few other side effects or symptoms so that the definition could be more thorough and well rounded, but I think the purpose of the definition was clear and achieved.
Organization:
- The organization of the document makes it easy to read and understand
- I like that the photos are included at the end (right before the references), so as not to unnecessarily break up the document
- The references are neatly laid out and easy to access if need be
- If those extra sections that I mentioned above were added, they would most likely fit best under the definitions and before the photos that are already on the document
Final Impressions:
The definition is clear and concise and doesn’t overwhelm or confuse the audience. A few minor adjustments:
- Including one or two more sections
- Expanding on section titles
Thank you for your definitions. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns.
Leave a Reply