Peer review of Anushka’s definition assignment

To:           Anushka Nair, ENGL 301 Student
From:     Jessica Barlescu, ENGL 301 Student
Date:      June 10th, 2022
Subject: Peer review / term: Search Engine Optimization

I have reviewed your definition assignment. I found it very interesting to read, especially since I am not familiar with marketing. Please see the review of the document below with suggests for improvement.

First Impressions:

  • This looks like an impressive definition document of the term ‘Search Engine Optimization.’ The assignment requirements are well-organized and only minor revision are required. It is missing a visual and the citation style needs correction.

Organization:

  • The document is very well organized.
  • The document contains a brief introduction and the parenthetical and sentence definitions above, and expanded definitions below.
  • The use of bold font and consistent spacing makes it easy to follow the content of the document.

Expression:

  • The expression is clear and the tone is professional.

Content:

  • The document includes:
    • Introduction
    • Two forms of definition
    • Four types of expansion
    • A works cited list
  • The document is missing:
    • Reading situation
    • A visual

Visuals:

  • Visual is missing from the assignment.

Works Cited List: 

  • Works cited list is not in correct MLA format.
  • In text citation used in the ‘Examples of Methods’ section is incorrect.

Grammar and Typos:

  • No grammar or typos identified.

 

I really enjoyed reading your definition assignment, and it has been a pleasure reviewing your work. I hope that my recommendations are helpful in your revision. Please let me know if you have any questions.

 

ENG 301 Term Definitions (Anushka)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*