Author: erikapaterson

Avoiding the Negative

Editing out the pronouns and avoiding the negative: EXAMPLE: “Your explanation of negation and why health equity is important today is quite vague and doesn’t provide specific case examples of the current problems surrounding health equity or in what context might the audience relate to

Survey and Interview Introduction: an example

Survey and Interview Introduction: an example  A common error with this assignment is the composition of the introduction to your surveys; this is extremely important. You must fulfill research ethics.  Here is a good example for you to study and follow

Details Please

The reader of a Peer Review is not necessarily the writer of the document under review – so details are necessary. Please note in the following examples how pronouns have been edited-out as well as details included in bold. Example:

Peer Review: Proposal for Determining the Feasibility of Employee Engagement Programs

To: MinZhang Si, UBC Student From: Kenny Colosie, Fellow Student, UBC. Date: February 11th, 2022 Subject: Review of Your Formal Report Proposal: Determining the Feasibility of Employment Engagement Programs   Hello MinZhang, I have reviewed the first draft of your

Reflection Blog 1:3

Reflection Blog 1:3 Peer review process Through the peer review process, I was able to learn from the strength of my partner’s definition and understand my weaknesses. Ben did an excellent job breaking down the components of the definition and

Self-Editing and Reflection Blogs

Good Monday 301 I want to give you a few tips for self-editing your definition assignment and writing your first Reflection Blog. Here is an excellent example of a previous student’s first Reflection blog and should provide you with a

Avoiding Pronouns: examples

The job as a Peer-reviewer is to review the document and provide suggestions for improving. Not to edit or even provide explanations for your suggestions. In a professional context, always consider your readers to be a busy people. Peer-reviews and

Organizing Peer Reviews; an example

Organizing Peer Reviews: Peer reviews should be organized with subheadings and bullet points Sub-headings should include each and every element of the document under review as well as general elements First Impressions is a good subheading to begin a review

Peer Review of Definitions – microaggression

To Anna Li From: Lucy Li Peer Review / Term: microaggression   Thank you for submitting your definition assignment. Please see my comments on the document below; I thoroughly enjoyed reading your work on defining the term and have provided some suggestions

How to Organize a Peer Review

Organizing Peer Reviews: Peer reviews should be organized with subheadings and bullet points Sub-headings should include each and every element of the document under review as well as general elements First Impressions is a good subheading to begin a review

Top

Spam prevention powered by Akismet